Sri Lankan cricketers r cheater and don't have sportman spirit. Always they weep when they r losing. Ban for one match or two can not change their characteristics. Whole Lankan team should be penalized heavily so that no player try to do this even ask to do by the Caption of any team.
1.if 3 runs left to win and baller ball no-ball, batsmen hit 4 run, then whether 2 runs from bat and 1 run from no-ball should be count or all 4run along with no-ball from bat should be consider? 2.if 1 run required to win and baller ball wide-ball, but last wicket get out by stumping, if the player declare out then from how much wicket the team won, or if he is said to be not-out then, this situation voiding the rule of stumping in wide-ball.
Re: Winning by No-ball run
by Anand on Aug 19, 2010 02:02 PM
Ans to ques 1: i think it will become as 5 no balls and goes to team total and not to batsman Ans to ques 2: Team wins by one wicket as the wide is completed first and the run out happens seconds. The team got enough runs to win by a wide..
Re: Re: Winning by No-ball run
by MeetFireWithFire on Aug 22, 2010 01:34 PM
There is one more way to look at it. Any team is entitled to loose all wickets and score winning runs. If the opposition takes a wicket of the wide ball, so be it. After all, it the runs that counts. So I would go as far as saying "A team can loose all wickets and can still win chasing..."
Re: Winning by No-ball run
by murthy cs on Aug 19, 2010 08:30 PM
The real culprit is the Rule maker. The rule is inconistant and cannot stand to any logic. The rule must be such that no one can take undue advantage of it. Here is a rule which does not help the game to be played in a sportive manner
This is not the first time they are doing.Before they have done to sachin and ganguly also. Icc should ban on these players who are involved in this incident. My suggestion is Randiv, sangakkara and their teammates should ban for atleast 5 years so that these type of incidents should not happen in future. East or west INDIA is the best.
It was a very very bad on the part of SRI LANKA to have done what they have done. They must know what true sportsmanship is. After all they can try to bowl him out too. Why go to unfair means to deny a batsman his deserved century? The ICC rules must now be looked into and may be it is time for a change now. Amendments must be done in the rule book. The guilty sportsman of SRI LANKA must be given some penalty so that the GENTLEMAN'S game is not taken for granted by anybody for breaking the rules etc.
