Re: Ban Srilankans from IPL
by Raj Thakre on Aug 17, 2010 06:59 PM
One of he good comment in this forum. Even if not, Suraj Randiv should not be allowed to play anytime in IPL
Re: modify the law
by Against Pseudos on Aug 18, 2010 08:07 AM
Dash:
If Sehwag was on 105 that time then he couldn't have made 200. So indeed ICC should look into this and modify all laws that ensure that Indian batsmen score centuries or double centuries in all games... ;-)
Re: Re: Worst cricketing
by Raj Thakre on Aug 17, 2010 07:00 PM
Sri Lankans are like that only. Murli is a real chucker but cant modify the history of hi 800 test wickets
Every player make his best efforts to score at least a century during a match... but what if he could not do this even when he has sufficient balls and time and even score to chase...and that's just bcoz bowler intentionally throws a no ball or wide ball or the keeper leaves the ball for four runs as byes... Sri Lankan players are not always loyal with the do's and don'ts while playing which matter a lot in international cricket... this has happened twice that they went to create another no ball,4 byes or wide just in order to not to allow the Indian Batsmen go for his century... First Sachin then Sehwag... and this could go on... so the ICC must think about it and shall go for a genuine decision so that no other player could remain from completing his century by just few runs just bcoz the bowler has done it as a partiality, we can say...
Please anyone dont scold randiv. It was the kind request made to him by Mr.Dhoni who is at the non striker's end. This not first time Dhoni did. He also tried the same tactics against sachin to deny his 200 in Kanpur. Sachin was on 199 from 47th over he did'nt give strike for sachin. The ball sachin gets strike is becoz of some fantastic fielding in the deep by SA else it would also an boundary
i think suraj had done it delibrately.even the ICC should rethink about no-ball law.it can happen many times ,if there is no ball than batsman play than the ball is over.if sahwag denied to play that ball ,than no-ball becomes dead ball.i think sahwag should given 6.
Re: wrong law
by appa imaging on Aug 17, 2010 06:01 PM
Please anyone dont scold randiv. It was the kind request made to him by Mr.Dhoni who is at the non striker's end. This not first time Dhoni did. He also tried the same tactics against sachin to deny his 200 in Kanpur. Sachin was on 199 from 47th over he did'nt give strike for sachin. The ball sachin gets strike is becoz of some fantastic fielding in the deep by SA else it would also an boundary
Re: wrong law
by Brijesh Pant on Aug 17, 2010 06:00 PM
See friends, the question is not of bending the laws to the situation; it is about the spirit of the game. When lankans (any other particular team or player) doesn't have the sportsmanship, he will find a way of making negative tactics. Nothing can be done in this regard other than giving him a tight welcome next time he comes to bowl in Indian soil.....ths will show our retaliation to his misdeeds....
