Discussion Board

Live updates: India vs SL, 3rd ODI


Total 889 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Moshadi Maino
imp point lost in all this tamasha: Ind played 5 bowlers
by Moshadi Maino on Aug 17, 2010 10:55 AM


That is the reason India won by a thumping margin.

At least now, Dhonni and his (non-performing) strategist Kirsten should realize the value of playing 5 bowlers.

Had we done this during the test matches, we would have won the series comfortably.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
BigCobra
Suraj Randiv
by BigCobra on Aug 17, 2010 10:10 AM  | Hide replies

lol.what a fruastrated looser you must be. lol

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Pankaj Vaid
Re: Suraj Randiv
by Pankaj Vaid on Aug 17, 2010 09:51 PM
lol!! you are real lol!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
C W
No surprise its Lanka
by C W on Aug 17, 2010 09:50 AM

Its no surprise that a Sri Lankan resorted to such a cheap trick yesterday. Sri Lankans are known to play with a mentality of street cricketers who depend of fooling, feigning and cheating to win on most occasions. Next in this category are the undisputable Pakistanis, but Sri Lankans are the masters in this trick. Sangakkara is one big cunning fox.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
shakti mohapatra
Learning from Success
by shakti mohapatra on Aug 17, 2010 09:16 AM  | Hide replies

Time to judge batsmen like Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma is NOW...in order to prevent what happened in the last match with New Zealand

    Forward  |  Report abuse
amol patil
Re: Learning from Success
by amol patil on Aug 17, 2010 09:39 AM
They had done well in past. atleast won few matches for india in a small career but what about JADEjA

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ashmit singh
Re: Re: Learning from Success
by ashmit singh on Aug 17, 2010 12:09 PM
india win will again cover the major weaknesses.. jadeja at number7 is the weakest link of our team.. dont understand why dhoni is still persisting with him.play a genuine batsman or if u wanna play 5 bowlers play a genuine bowler.no team plays 5 genuine bowlers coz no 1 can afford it ... 1 day cricket is anyways batsmen's game. still if u r so desperate play a genuine bowler.rohit sharma,virat kohli are decent performers.they deserve some more chance.and rohit was given a wrong decision.but JADEJA IS A WASTE.cudnt produce a single gud performance

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Legionnaire
Sehwag
by Legionnaire on Aug 17, 2010 08:55 AM  | Hide replies

Sehwag is a no nonsense guy, by saying that Randhiv did it delebrately he is merely stating a fact and putting an end to the debate. I don't think Sehwag is going to loose a second of his sleep because a century to him is denied. The kind of talent he has along with unshakeable self-confidence in his abilities he knows he will score many many more centuries

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ashmit singh
Re: Sehwag
by ashmit singh on Aug 17, 2010 12:13 PM
ya very true... but randiv's act was against d spirit of d game.. it shows why it is fast becoming a 'game of street men' from a 'game of gentlemen'.. he was hit out of d park for a six anyways to show his real calibre... moral victory for sehwag.. shame on randiv...it shows dat deep inside u a jealous loser

   Forward   |   Report abuse
tendusach
viru rocks.
by tendusach on Aug 17, 2010 08:55 AM  | Hide replies

viru is the best no doubt in that but wat the bowler did is also right , why should he allow his opposite team player 2 score a century . he is doin his job. in the end India won & viru played great ..& tat matter

    Forward  |  Report abuse
shanehind
Re: viru rocks.
by shanehind on Aug 17, 2010 09:01 AM
It is a Game Mate, to be played like a Game, not war, these things screw up the spirit of game, watch crecket matches before 1985, the opposite team would applouse and cheer if somebody hits a 50 or a Hundred.
Grow up

   Forward   |   Report abuse
satish chandar
Re: Re: viru rocks.
by satish chandar on Aug 17, 2010 03:19 PM
How many times opponents applaud the effort of a guy?? Even they throw ball at the batsmen.. What Randiv idid is wrong.. But not a crime..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
manjit
Re: viru rocks.
by manjit on Aug 17, 2010 09:42 AM
Is there a word spoartsmanship in the dictionary?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
satish chandar
Re: Re: viru rocks.
by satish chandar on Aug 17, 2010 03:17 PM
What are u going to do with it?? Had he chucked the ball or bowled a beamer at the batsman's head, it s scalled unsportsmanship..

Bowling a innocuous No ball, though it denies century to opponent is not that bad thing to do..

In our country, the fans are themselves obsessed with records than the win!!Then, why cant the players??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
candy bhatia
Sehwag issue
by candy bhatia on Aug 17, 2010 08:50 AM  | Hide replies

According to me, the randiv issue is very debatable but should be left alone.

In favour of Sehwag, Randiv should have rather tried to bowl him or get him out and not bowl an unfair no-ball.

In favour of Randiv, he could have easily bowled a no-ball in the past 2 deliveries which Sehwag defended.

However, we should be happy that the lankans gave the victory away on purpose and didnt fight till the last second. Bravo Sehwag..!!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
manjit
Re: Sehwag issue
by manjit on Aug 17, 2010 09:45 AM
Very interesting...
A killer had a gun and he could have killed many people if wanted to but he didn't. So he is innocent.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Sehwag issue
by Against Pseudos on Aug 17, 2010 10:37 AM
Manjit:

Good point. The guy with the gun WAS innocent when he didn't kill.

If someone committed suicide when the guy wasn't shooting, you wouldn't hang the guy with the gun, just because he had a gun; would you? :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RK Nair
Re: Sehwag issue
by RK Nair on Aug 18, 2010 09:14 PM
Surprise ! "not bowl an unfair no-ball".
RK Nair

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 889 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message