Re: No one cares abt SRT except some fawning Ind fans
by Against Pseudos on Aug 06, 2010 06:49 AM
Oomshik Tooshik:
Very well said. Only fawning Indian fans like Brian Lara, Richard Hadlee, Imran Khan, Kapil Dev, Sir Don Bradman, Wasim Akram, Ricky Ponting, Muralitharan etc. etc. care about Sachin..
World's greatest souls like you don't care about him...
That's clear, established, documented and well known... :)
Re: No one cares abt SRT except some fawning Ind fans
by frank G on Aug 04, 2010 02:41 PM
DID YOU KNOW THAT ONE OF THE EASY way TO attract replies & ATTENTION IS TO BLAME SACHIN ?
Re: No one cares abt SRT except some fawning Ind fans
by Ritwik Bhuyan on Aug 04, 2010 02:17 PM
Which must be the reason why he gets a standing applause by the Australian, English, New Zealanders, West Indians, and fans from every other nations every time he comes out to bat, every time he tours there.
Those standing applauses are reserved for 'ordinary' players.
Re: Re: No one cares abt SRT except some fawning Ind fans
by Oomshik Tooshik on Aug 04, 2010 02:24 PM
This is from Indians in those countries. No one cares abt cricket anyway in Eng and NZ.
Re: Re: Re: No one cares abt SRT except some fawning Ind fans
by Ritwik Bhuyan on Aug 04, 2010 02:28 PM
LOL, we have all seen those white fans standing up and applauding for him every time comes out to bat. By lying you won't be able to hide the truth. There are still videos all over youtube where one can see those masses of white Aussie, English and Kiwi fans standing on their feet and applauding him every time he came to bat.
But I won't blame you. Lying is the only way left when one is slapped with the bitter taste of reality.
Re: Re: Re: Re: No one cares abt SRT except some fawning Ind fans
by Oomshik Tooshik on Aug 04, 2010 02:40 PM
the moment you need to say 'white fans applaud', you show that Indian inferiority complex that you talk about above.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: No one cares abt SRT except some fawning Ind
by Ritwik Bhuyan on Aug 04, 2010 02:44 PM
The moment I say 'white fans', I retaliated your lie that only Indians from those nations stand up and applaud SRT. Once again you have tried to lie and divert the topic, because I proved yourself to an utter liar previously. The only thing you did manage with your above post is confirm my claims. Thank you.
I'd rather be an SRT fan, instead of a typical Indian suffering from the common INFERIORITY COMPLEX syndrome.
Re: No one cares abt SRT except some fawning Ind fans
by frank G on Aug 04, 2010 02:41 PM
DID YOU KNOW THAT ONE OF THE EASY way TO attract replies & ATTENTION IS TO BLAME SACHIN ?
Re: Re: No one cares abt SRT except some fawning Ind fans
by Sameer on Aug 04, 2010 03:47 PM
yes we all know. But someof us are bored at work and need to present someone with a "DOH Hat".
ALso some of the posters ( might be all) are actually rediff employees, trying to get as many hits as possible for the website
This is going to be most memorable & cherishable moment in his 20 years of cricketing arena, & am sure he is going to say good bye after this feat. If he fails to get 2011 WC ,this is going to be thorn in his heart & this undone feat will haunt in one corner of his heart for ever & its sure
Re: Part of world cup winning team
by Chetan Dudam on Aug 04, 2010 01:55 PM
Freind your r right but if he plays the 2011 WC and fails to get INdia the World Cup then this will be going to be thorn in everybody heart
Re: Part of world cup winning team
by leo here on Aug 04, 2010 01:40 PM
sack dis garbage out and we will win wcup....if he palys max he ll score runs in league matches den ditces us in imp matches , like he has done in past
Re: Re: Part of world cup winning team
by Naveen N on Aug 04, 2010 02:01 PM
Unless you win the league games, you won't get to play the "important games".
Re: Re: Part of world cup winning team
by Mr Infinity on Aug 04, 2010 03:31 PM
So that means he goes to world cup with 10 other idi0ts who are just sitting ducks there, right? He takes India to important matches but get tired, can't perform and our sitting ducks does their job, sit to lose, right?
1. none of hsi century is in all time top 100 of wisden 2. He never won test match in aus wen mcgrath was there. 3. He neevr won any test in pak wen wasim akhtar waqar were there. 4 He never won us test in sa wen pollock donald were there. 5 No ICC test player award
Re: missing list
by Sameer on Aug 04, 2010 01:51 PM
Just 1 question ... you are talking about cricket right ? The game where there are 11 players playing from each team ? It seems like you are talking about some individual sport
Re: Re: missing list
by kedar kulkarni on Aug 04, 2010 02:03 PM
absulutly correct sameer, every one forgets that in Test Cricket one need to take 20 wickets to win a match and not score 1000 runs.. India never had bowling attach which could take those 20 wickets.. In ODI's runs are all imp so Sachin outscored everyone there in ODI's and got max number of man of the match awards..
Some Facts
Most Man of the Match (MoM) awards in ODIs (61 MoM awards, as of March 1, 2010). Most Man of the Match awards in World Cup Matches (8 MoM awards, as of March 1, 2010). Most Man of the Series (MoS) awards in ODI cricket (15 MoS awards, as of March 1, 2010).
Re: missing list
by Mr Infinity on Aug 04, 2010 03:42 PM
He never won??? Did you mean India never won? we are talking about cricket here and it's a team game you know?
Re: Re: missing list
by Sunil Vaidya on Aug 04, 2010 06:26 PM
Mr Infinity, when people say sachin does not score when needed they mean that when the target is really difficult and when not many wickets are left when it is his responsibility to take india to the winning line he fails more often than not. most of sachin's centuries have come when the target is easy or moderate. if you will honestly check those score cards you will understand. much has been said about his 17 tons while chasing "huge(???)" scores. i had given details of all those 17 centuries in my post a few days ago. if you missed that post i would like to ask you to visit cricinfo site. please check those 17 score cards and see how "huge" targets they really were. first of all our bowlers restricted the opposition to moderate scores and put us in winning position. sachin merely completed the formalities, even then he was not the lone scorer. there were many other contributing in that department also. also about those 60 or 61 MOM matches. i would again ask you to got through the score cards of those matches and judge for yourself how much the contributions of others were. it is indeed a fact that when the target is something like 180/200/220/240 sachin scores very well 7-8 times of out of 10. But when the target is really difficult or challenging (or huge as many like to put it) sachin fails 7-8 times out of 10 to make a really good score.
Re: Re: Re: missing list
by Sunil Vaidya on Aug 04, 2010 06:33 PM
i seriously and sincerely ask every sachin fanatic to go through all the score cards of his all matches and make a list of all his scores while chasing targets upto 240-250 runs.
Then make a list of all his scores while chasing targets about 270 runs.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: missing list
by Against Pseudos on Aug 06, 2010 06:55 AM
Sunil Vaidya:
Can you kindly produce that list please? And whilst you are on the job, also include Brian Lara, Ricky Ponting, and whoever else you think is the world's best batsman so that we can see the clear comparison... ;-)
Re: AGAIN I SAY SACHIN IS NOT A MATCH WINNER
by leo here on Aug 04, 2010 01:29 PM
ryte he has never won us any test match in aus and sa...4 get abt winning wcup...like ponting warne and afridi did 4 their teams
Re: Re: AGAIN I SAY SACHIN IS NOT A MATCH WINNER
by Against Pseudos on Aug 06, 2010 06:57 AM
Leo Nowhere:
Sorry. You are wrong. Ponting and Warne didn't do that for their team. It was McGrath who did it for Ponting and Warne.
Sorry it wasn't McGrath who did it for his team, it was Ian Healy who did it for McGrath.
Sorry, it wasn't Ian Healy who did it for his team, it was Michael Hussey who did it for Ian Healey..
And Afridi? Who is this chap? He never did anything for Ponting, Warne, Healy or Hussey... or rather he did a lot to Ponting... after all Australia holds the world record of most consecutive wins against Pakistan... ;-)
Re: VINOD KAMBLI WAS GR8
by Gajanan on Aug 04, 2010 01:01 PM
kambli was f*king bore batsman.. he was in int'l cricket only b'coz he was Ramakant Achrekar's student and Sachin's friend. but i know why u think kambli was gr8, john.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: VINOD KAMBLI WAS GR8
by Gajanan on Aug 04, 2010 01:13 PM
if u really kno who u r who wouldn't have said or thought a thing about religion. only narrow minded ppl like u think and talk about religion
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: VINOD KAMBLI WAS GR8
by Gajanan on Aug 04, 2010 01:32 PM
ans to ur below post:
i didn't question anything about ur releigion or about kambli's religion... i least care about what ur religions are. it is u who thinks that i am talking about religion. kambli played 17 tests now go and compare Sachin's first 17 tests with those of kambli's complete career. also compare the match winning performances of the two.. don't shoot in dark bcoz u r jealous of Sachin's feat.
Re: Tired of blind SRT adulation...
by Sameer on Aug 04, 2010 01:10 PM
so wait , why are you playing the same old song . Wasn't your band baja thrown out of the window for the past 2-3 days ?
every word you blabbered has been proven wrong. I pit your parents and the folks to be associated with a loser like you.
Man your parents would be really disgusted with themselves to have given birth to you. If they have any self respect, they might even contemplate issuing a public telecast apology and then ending their lives in shame. All because of you.
Re: Tired of blind SRT adulation...
by Gajanan on Aug 04, 2010 01:06 PM
who r the contemporary players who have not scored on flat pitches for records or otherwise. if test cricket is not followed by fans then why are we all talking about it even in this forum. finally, instead of generalising meritocracy with Indians read ur post once again, see urself in mirror and then tell us who is mediocre.
Re: Tired of blind SRT adulation...
by Naveen N on Aug 04, 2010 01:23 PM
I've never een much of a fan of Sachin tendulkar. I've always enjoyed watching people like Jonty Rhodes, Ajay Jadeja and Mark Waugh perform out there. But what I don't understand is why people like you think Sachin does nothing. Blind Adulation or otherwise, he's given joy to a billion Indians and much more. Who cares whether he's known outside of India or not. i don't and I don't think Sachin doesn't either. His job is to play cricket and perform at the highest level possible, and he's done so for 1 years straight. Cricket is played by 10 countries around the world, and that's 9 more than the World Series of Baseball?
Mediocrity? He's been rated the best by some of the most impressive bowlers in the world - Glenn McGrath, Allan Donald, Shane Warne, Courtney Walsh etc. How many other batsmen can boast of such praise? One or two maybe? This guys is No Roger Federer or Usain Bolt because he's not playing a single person game. If he were, then the records speak for themselves, and he's left his contemporaries far behind. As for Pele, he still had "assists" from his fellow team mates to score goals. It's not blind idolization. What you need to understand is just like how you like another sportsman, there's more people who think like you and they picked Sachin Tendulkar.
1. Triple Don 2. Fastest 50/100 3. Highest Test Innings Score 4. Highest Test Innings Not out score 5. 100 and 5 wicket haul (together) 6. Most consecutive 100s
Re: Re: Some of the Missing records
by Sameer on Aug 04, 2010 01:00 PM
yes and that 7th point he has done 50 times. You only remember the times he couldn't
