Discussion Board

''Gavaskar should have replaced Modi''


Total 268 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Desi Bihari
Kapil Dev
by Desi Bihari on Apr 29, 2010 01:50 PM

Would have been the best ipl commissioner

    Forward  |  Report abuse
setlur nagesh
Thackery
by setlur nagesh on Apr 29, 2010 07:18 AM  | Hide replies

Who is this thackeray .Why he wants only Maharashtrian .Thackeray should shut his mouth and remain silent

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ishaqk
Re: Thackery
by Ishaqk on Apr 29, 2010 07:33 AM
Ravi Sastri is a Kannadiga.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
such jano
MODI MAY BE CORRUPT FOR SURE LIKE ANY OTHER INDIAN
by such jano on Apr 29, 2010 07:14 AM  | Hide replies

bur you owe it to him that IPL is what it is today.

Its really funny to suggest Sunny or shastri for IPL commissioner post.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ishaqk
Re: MODI MAY BE CORRUPT FOR SURE LIKE ANY OTHER INDIAN
by Ishaqk on Apr 29, 2010 07:35 AM
Modi had stolen ICL and made it IPL. Essar group is the brain behind ICL.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sledge Hammer
Mandira Bedy
by Sledge Hammer on Apr 28, 2010 07:19 PM  | Hide replies

as IPL Commissioner

What say guys???

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ishaqk
Re: Mandira Bedy
by Ishaqk on Apr 29, 2010 07:36 AM
The balls will stick in between her ..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
prashant gundani
Re: Mandira Bedy
by prashant gundani on Apr 29, 2010 01:25 AM
can't say just laugh

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Indian indian
Not fit
by Indian indian on Apr 28, 2010 06:55 PM  | Hide replies

Both of them are not fit for anything other then giveing commentary.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ravichandran
Re: Not fit
by Ravichandran on Apr 29, 2010 08:44 AM
just a small correction, BIASED commentary.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
k vijayakumar
be at your politics
by k vijayakumar on Apr 28, 2010 06:49 PM  | Hide replies

Mr.Thackrey,
When you ask Sachin to stick on to Cricket and not to talk about politics, better you mind your politics and dont suggest for cricket. I know you have better business to look into.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
rakesh bhusare
Re: be at your politics
by rakesh bhusare on Apr 28, 2010 07:22 PM
Mr.k vijayakumar,

He is not talking about how to play cricket. He s just pointing the right thing about the politics which is happening in cricket,,,in precise hope u understand,,

   Forward   |   Report abuse
BGK
Re: Re: be at your politics
by BGK on Apr 28, 2010 10:57 PM
Thackerey is justing making his anti-Gujrati feelings clear...nothing else makes sense. Left to him he will even recommend Kambli or dada Khondke for IPL. And what gives the great Bala-saheb of Enron-fame the moral authority to talk about corruption?? It is as hilarious as Rahul-baba talking about merit over dynastic politics!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
k vijayakumar
Re: Re: be at your politics
by k vijayakumar on Apr 29, 2010 03:08 PM
when Sachin has no business in Politics then he doesnt have anything to say about Cricket.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
nrthwst
Saamna?
by nrthwst on Apr 28, 2010 06:37 PM  | Hide replies

Does anyone read Saamna paper outside mumbai or infact outside Dadar central area?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ishaqk
Re: Saamna?
by Ishaqk on Apr 29, 2010 07:38 AM
Saamma is bold. TOI has to fear Congi, NCP etc before printing a letter.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
BGK
Re: Saamna?
by BGK on Apr 28, 2010 10:59 PM
Out of fear for the goons, Times of India reporter (and now rediff's)definitely reads the junk!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
milind chougule
Re: Saamna?
by milind chougule on Apr 28, 2010 06:45 PM
Hind media reads and thus whole India.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
rajeev prasad
WHY
by rajeev prasad on Apr 28, 2010 06:32 PM  | Hide replies

why only mumbai people and Brahmans

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Manali Desai
Re: WHY
by Manali Desai on Apr 28, 2010 06:41 PM
Gavaskar and Wadekar are not Brahmins...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
rajeev prasad
Re: Re: WHY
by rajeev prasad on Apr 28, 2010 07:10 PM
sunil manohar gavaskar is a pakka bramhin. dont know about ajit wadekar

   Forward   |   Report abuse
BGK
Re: WHY
by BGK on Apr 28, 2010 11:01 PM
It is typical Thackerey- any M Manoos from the backyard will do ranting which his fans love (as is apparent in some postings here)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Junior Shelly
Some people...
by Junior Shelly on Apr 28, 2010 06:24 PM  | Hide replies

are talking as if the present Mumbai is the result of the efforts of Maharashtrians only. Mumbai (Bombay) was made famous by the Europeans as a port city, and its growth was triggered by the inflow of entrepreneurs and labourers from all over India. The local language of Mumbai is a mixture of Marathi, Hindi, Tamil, Urudu, Gujarathi etc. If we take out the contributions of non-marathis from the history of Mumbai, the result would be disgusting- at the least.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Pakka Indian
Re: Some people...
by Pakka Indian on Apr 29, 2010 02:02 AM
get lost

   Forward   |   Report abuse
milind chougule
Re: Some people...
by milind chougule on Apr 28, 2010 06:46 PM
where your posting is leading? is this in line with rediff.com publishing?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 268 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message