the whole idea of league cricket is brain child of subash chandra duly executed by Mr. Kapil Dev Lalit modi & co took the cream by introducing IPL now if BCCI should make Kapil Dev the commisionar of IPL- he is a true legend- a leader by all means
Re: kapil dev
by k vijayakumar on Apr 28, 2010 06:46 PM
Kapil is a honest and a clean man. These corrupt people would not allow him to operate peacefully. We still respect the legend for his contribution and the credit for all entertainments on IPL really goes to him.
Re: kapil dev
by Hindustani on Apr 28, 2010 06:33 PM
Boss, very right, Kapil dev is inventor and BCCI/Modi have modifed it, but its brain child of Kapil Paaji.
Re: Re: kapil dev
by BGK on Apr 28, 2010 11:02 PM
It is unfortunate that Kapil/Subash's venture did not take off. But that happens in business- no point in raking the past! However, Kapil did burn bridges with BCCI.
On the last few occasions, Bal Thackeray has been talking sense. It would have been better to have a cricketer in place of Lalit Modi. It could have been a universally respected non-controversial and unbiased cricketer like Kapil Dev, Mohinder Amarnath or Venkataraghavan.
Re: Choice
by BGK on Apr 28, 2010 11:05 PM
The IPL chief is not expected to play cricket. He/ She has to have the business acumen. I am sure the average level of cricket amongst business in India is more than enough. Just like great players like Kapil and Sachin never made good captains, there is a difference here.
this thakrey who is the inventor of all wroing things in india is asking to why u havent given the chance to gavaskar.,...o this person is the biggest scandalous cricketer and backbone of matchfixing and ravi shastri.....the o e who sent SMS to saying "let us keep mum and wait for better oppurtunity" ajit wadhkar the old person who dont know whats new....this thakrey just want marathi manoos to come whether he is good or bad....its time that we should not read or right anything comming from the mouth peice samna editor bal thakrey as he has lost his senses.
Re: old no sense
by nikhil deshpande on Apr 28, 2010 07:14 PM
FYI, Ravi Shastri hails from Manglore. His ancestors are from Karnataka not from Maharshtra. don't comment with half knowledge.
Re: Re: old no sense
by BGK on Apr 28, 2010 11:09 PM
If we go by Thackerey's rantings even Dravid is a Maharashtrian because he married one. If at all of any relevance Dravid's pedigree is from Tanjore, nowhere close to MH. But that is what parochial feelings is all about and nutjobs like Balasaheb keep faning it!
WHO STARTED, BETTING IN CRICKET AND MATCH FIXING, IF NARCO ANALYSIS IS CARRIED OUT, PEOPLE WILL BE SHOCKED TO KNOW THE CULPRITS, IT WAS SUNIL GAVASKAR /RAVI SHASTRI BAL THAKERY SON. MOTHER OF CORRUPTION STARTS AND ENDS AT OFFICIALS OF BCCI.
Re: hi
by V SR on Apr 28, 2010 06:19 PM
Because he is too old and his vision is not beyond his mumbai. That is where he can loot from his own people and he knows only that mohalla.
Re: hi
by milind chougule on Apr 28, 2010 05:18 PM
he took Shasrti's name who is from Karnakata, he took Patodi's name who is from Delhi. Grow up man. Do not be bias and blindly comment here.
Re: Re: Re: hi
by milind chougule on Apr 28, 2010 05:44 PM
You must be product of Pakistan who always barks at Baalsaheb. But do not forget, he is tiger of India.
Re: Re: hi
by BGK on Apr 28, 2010 11:13 PM
Pataudi is from Hyderabad. Shastri's name was included only with Mumbai Manoos perspective. It is as though rest of India's contribution to cricket is zero. When it comes to a business proposition, everyone even in great Mumbai knows no one can beat a Gujju! If Thackerey has the Ba..s why doesn't he ask someone other than Ambani to own the Mumbai team?
Re: Re: hi
by ganesh on Apr 28, 2010 05:41 PM
Hey Milind you first grown up and then teach others to grow, shastri is from karnataka what a joke, he is from mumbai, he played for mumbai, first you correct yourself and try to correct others, samuel is right Thackeray always talsk like that and he will be, no one can change him because he do all these things for vote.
Re: Re: Re: hi
by milind chougule on Apr 28, 2010 05:43 PM
Ganesh, this is your new invention. My dear friend Shastri was born in Manglore and came to Mumbai in 1972. First get your facts clear my dear friend. Do not blindly comment and do not make yourself as a joke. Peoples are laughing at you my dear friend.
Re: Re: Re: Re: hi
by BGK on Apr 28, 2010 11:16 PM
So what is your theory: Marathi Manoos made Mumbai so everyone who came in be it Shastri or Ambani are outsiders? And you call yourself cosmopolitan??
Re: Re: Re: Re: hi
by sontrama puranpo on Apr 28, 2010 05:51 PM
if gaesh thinks nobody laughing at him then please ganesh be a man. I am laughing at you. milind is right that shastri was born in manglore and he is migrant to mumbai. ganesh please correct ur knowledge first and then teach others.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: hi
by V SR on Apr 28, 2010 06:20 PM
OK OK keep laughing. The point is none of the 3 is worth to head IPL. That is why some gujju guy is made the head. Over. and Period.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: hi
by Jai Hind on Apr 28, 2010 06:19 PM
Even Bal was not born in Maharashtra. To Bal Ravi Shastri is maharashtrian or maybe he forgot where Shashtri was born.
The BCCI is not Shiv Sena Legacy The BCCI Headquarter must immediately be shifted to Union Territory so that Mumbaikar or shiv sena interference can be eliminated
Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar Legacy
by V SR on Apr 28, 2010 05:31 PM
Why not make Mumbai union terriotry and throw out thakrays to Sholapur and Kolapur.
Re: Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar Legacy
by milind chougule on Apr 28, 2010 05:33 PM
why not? This would be done after throwing out from rediff.com. Important thing is that to understand Mr. Balasaheb, you should have born as Hindu.
Re: Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar Legacy
by milind chougule on Apr 28, 2010 05:34 PM
Mr. V SR, Shut your mouth and go back to your Pakistan. Mumbai is not union terriotry, it is capital of Indian State- Maharashtra. To understand history of India/Maharashtra, you should have born as Indian.You bloody pakistani.
Re: Re: Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar Legacy
by V SR on Apr 28, 2010 05:37 PM
Any body talks about Mumbai being part of India should go to Pakistan. Mumbai kya thera baap for property hai kya?
Re: Re: Re: Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar Legacy
by milind chougule on Apr 28, 2010 05:40 PM
Yes, of course its property of my baap. You pakistani.The language used by you itself how r u and ur family? That is your real identity. Anyway my best regards to you & ur family, but for god sake, please use good words.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar Legacy
by V SR on Apr 28, 2010 06:21 PM
As if you have used some nice words like your patron balasaheb. The whole community of yours looks like part of some goon gang.
Re: Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar Legacy
by hyderabad on Apr 28, 2010 05:45 PM
thakreys are not even from sholapur or kolhapur...they are from far villages in midhya pradesh...we need to keep them in jharkand zoos with koda and sibu soren.
Re: Re: Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar Legacy
by milind chougule on Apr 28, 2010 05:47 PM
along with you my dear friend. Before them, you deserv for it.
Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar Legacy
by milind chougule on Apr 28, 2010 05:16 PM
You should be shifted to pakistan so that your interference on commenting Balasaheb can be eliminated.
Re: Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar Legacy
by V SR on Apr 28, 2010 05:38 PM
Thera balasaheab is not able to get from his bed even. We heard he is doing everything in bed. What Thakray? In next few years, all these goons will be gone forever. Keep mourning.
Re: Re: Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar Legacy
by milind chougule on Apr 28, 2010 05:41 PM
He will go but definately killing anti-indian peoples like you Mr. V SR. And afterall you will also have to go. Days are not far away when you will also doing the same in the bed. Do not get tense. It is natural.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar Legacy
by V SR on Apr 28, 2010 06:25 PM
I am in my Mumbai and very much in Kalanagar for the past 35 years. I am here much before BKC was conceptualised. And I know these guys and their activities. I am a proud Mumbaikar but hate these goons who are worth not even a penny. They are cockroaches and mess in the society.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar Legacy
by milind chougule on Apr 28, 2010 06:12 PM
On what basis, you made your mind that Balasahev makes fuss. You must be unaware of ground reality. Postingns posted by you itself shows that you just blindly watch hindi news channel, you do not use your own brain to judge whether whatever is showing on newschannel is correct? Did you ever try to find out the real facts? If no, come to Mumbai, stay for some time and experience. I am sure you would probably notice the different side/face of Shiv-sena & Mr. Baalasaheb.
Re: Re: Re: Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar Legacy
by hyderabad on Apr 28, 2010 05:49 PM
why r u getting emotional chougle...tell what this old bal thakrey has done to maharastrians...be striaght and simple...be true to urself..anyone can support anyone and can defend....but justify urself...this fellow has looted marathis....for self gain. and nothing beyond that....he was a pooper and know holds lot of money....of whos its marathis money...maharastra was always a rich state and development has started way back...it was these peoples mistake that destoryed the textile industry made investors to go outside...these are the peoples who supported mafia dons and created problem in mumbia...open ur eyes....if ur father rpes ur wife will u still love him....think.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar Legacy
by milind chougule on Apr 28, 2010 05:57 PM
Mr. Hyderabad, my dear friend, it shows that you have thorough research on Baalsaheb. but most important thing is that you did not complete your research without higlight the facts of 93 riots in Mumbai. My dear friend, you says "If your father rapres your wife, will you still love him", I am quite surprise to see your this type of postings in public. My dear friend, if that could have been truth, why did more than 80 shiv-sanikis lost their life while fighting against the peoples who were raping hindu girsl and womens. The people like you and me were sleeping, but shiv-sena's nights were sleepless during riots. On what basis my dear friend you are asking me "why i m getting emotionl? I have met personally few of them who were eye-witness of 93 riots. My kind request to consider them in your research before commenting on Mr. Baalasaheb. Secondly, you say he destroyed textile industry, but the fact of matter is that
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar Le
by milind chougule on Apr 28, 2010 06:04 PM
When Mr. Datta Samant - a union leader was killed, first doubt was at Mr. Baalasaheb and at Owner of Mafatlal. Rumours were there that Mafatlal Management team utilized Mr. Balasaheb to Kill Datta Samant? Morever, Shiv-sena were nowhere in the picture. Morever, for your updates, no industry has gone out of Maharashtra and the fact of matter is that Maharashtra is consitently progressing. Foreign direct investment are considering Maharashtra as their best choic beacause the skill, talent that Maharashtra has produced ever. Our indian states too have that talent and still priority to set up industry is given to Maharashtra. I respect Mr. Baalasaheb, beacuse I have all news that were published in 93 and Hindu's were safe in Mumbai as beacuse of Shiv-sena. But most hurting me is what that you comment based on the news published by Hindi & English News channels who are paid by congress Party ruling India and Maharashtra as well. In fact, Maharashtra has recorded its maximum investment during Shiv-sena's ruling days - 95 to 99.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar
by milind chougule on Apr 28, 2010 06:24 PM
V SR to your below quote: It shows mentality of yours and family. You keep on talking on wife, You must be more interested in others. You will do but naturally you will put blame on Baalasaheb. The more you hate Baalasaheb, I will love you more beacause if someone hates Baalasaheb, my love for him keep on increasing. Thanks for your hate. It makes me proud that I am a strong supporter of Shiv-sena. Histroy repeats that there is no value to the person who always talks truth and fact. Baalasaheb and shiv-sena is idel example of this. You would keep on natrually supporting the peoples like kasab, mulla mahasud.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: BCCI is not Shiv Sena's or Mumbaikar Legacy
by V SR on Apr 28, 2010 06:14 PM
Hyderabad, there is no point in explaining to this guy, milind. If he has open he will understand. In the name of balasaheb, he will accept indignity to his own wife. Such people, we need to leave them to their fate. And because of such people only goons like thakrays survives.
