we need to keep rotating players even if they are doing well to keep the competition going .. whats the point of making players complecant .. i cant imagine that players like raina, jadega, praveen etc. will be playing all the time .. its high time you need rohit sharma back in the team,, else he will loose his confidence and we dont want this to happen .. he is too good a player and we need to keep grooming him ..
Re: rotation is important ..
by rocky on Nov 11, 2009 08:12 PM
Rohit Sharma averages less than 25 and has strike rate of nearly 70. The last 20 matches he has palyed in the first 5 positions but his average and strike rate is not worht talking about.
Re: rotation is important ..
by LG on Nov 11, 2009 08:30 PM
Deepak,
It is like treating the unhurt arm. Important thing is we need players who are talented and have passion to play for country and team India.
In addition to that, we need someone to give counseling to these new players who could taste quick fame and get lots of money with success against weak teams and thus lose track of their main objectives.
Re: Re: rotation is important ..
by naveen dhanerwal on Nov 12, 2009 09:32 AM
LG, Rocky, believe it or not, Rohit Sharma is the best batsman in our domestic cricket. It's fine that he couldn't prove this yet but mark my words friends, he's gonna be the best batman for india in future.
Re: Re: Re: rotation is important ..
by LG on Nov 12, 2009 09:44 AM
naveen dhanerwal,
Yes I do agree with you, Rohit is the most talented youngster. But his problem is his attitude. He started thinking that he needs no improvement--after getting out in similar fashion repeatedly, all he could say, " That is the way I play". If he improves his attitude, he could be the reason people may watch cricket after Sachin retires.
Re: Rains and Cricket
by LG on Nov 11, 2009 08:14 PM
mandook,
you will never understand--- that success and growth of a organization or a team depends on collective contributions not on contribution by an individual--because it is beyond the capacity of the brain you have got. But the, Pakies are famous for being born with smaller brain-- the sate you your country proves this point.
Re: Rains and Cricket
by rkdmumbai on Nov 11, 2009 08:09 PM
Sachin is ever green... he bounces back ... he has kept the form intact than any other player of the world.
Re: Rains and Cricket
by dharmendra jadoun on Nov 11, 2009 08:46 PM
you can not find more positive thing then sachin ... he is not god but human ... and his dedication make him different then others... there is a difference between sports and movie
You look like a person who wants a raise without being productive to his/her company, but have grudge against productive people who get raise for their contributions.
Do you have any idea who can make records? You think making records easy. One can make it the moment one want to make one. You have to be the best in what you do.
Do you really know that it is not a plastic record-- you or your dad might have used it for listing musics--that you can buy in market cheaply.
Re: ramana
by LG on Nov 11, 2009 07:48 PM
You have to be the best consistently in what you do over a long period of time on all kind of pitches and against all kind of bowlers/batsmen.
In test, each and every inning is important. On a green top wicket, and against fast bowlers, first inning is as important as playing in 2nd or 4th inning on wicket that assist spinner on 2 day onwards.
Only people who want to prove their invalid views will always come up with such insignificant statement--giving importance to one particular inning of a test match .
Re: Sachin is only for making record himself not for country..
by LG on Nov 11, 2009 07:55 PM
ramana,
You looks like a guy who wants to a raise without being productive to your company, but have grudge against productive people who get raise for their contributions.
Re: Re: Sachin is only for making record himself not for country.
by mandook on Nov 11, 2009 08:05 PM
what is the use of the contributions when success of the team eludes?
Re: Re: Re: Sachin is only for making record himself not for coun
by LG on Nov 11, 2009 08:11 PM
mandook,
you will never understand--- that success and growth of a organization or a team depends on collective contributions not on contribution by an individual--because it is beyond the capacity of the brain you have got.
Re: Re: Sachin is only for making record himself not for country.
by rocky on Nov 11, 2009 07:22 PM
yes. doantion is really required than keeping to self :)
Re: Re: Re: Sachin is only for making record himself not for coun
by Gopal panda on Nov 11, 2009 07:25 PM
Donating wud not help, becoz he himself cannot score the total runs, other team members have to score as well. to make sachin's run capable enough to win india
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sachin is only for making record himself not for
by rocky on Nov 11, 2009 07:32 PM
he cannot score the total runs, he can score 175 but not 178. Thanks for letting me know :)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sachin is only for making record himself not
by S Shrikanth on Nov 11, 2009 08:03 PM
Win is Win, Loss is Loss.
A century like 175 is not worth if the person gets out at critical moment by hitting a silly shot and put the burden of making 8.5 runs/over on tail enders.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sachin is only for making record himself not
by rocky on Nov 11, 2009 08:20 PM
a miss is a miss. Sachins 175 was a great innings but he is to be equally blamed for not taking India to victory more so with the type of shot he played. also, in hte previous matches on complete batting tracks he was scoring 3 runs in 15 balls and that with the field restrictions on. But, no one talks abt Sachin palying slow instead all the blame for that match wa sput on newcomers who cud not score the require runs with the run rate mounting to morre than 8. They were expected to score at more than 8 from hte onset.
Re: Re: Re: Sachin is only for making record himself not for coun
by Against Pseudos on Nov 11, 2009 07:23 PM
Rocky
Which is why I said, India should have won that match comfortably, considering that the other TEN had scored 347, and Sachin took away his whole 175 for himself. :)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sachin is only for making record himself not
by Sarthak Sharma on Nov 11, 2009 07:43 PM
Thanks for letting ME know that the rest 11 can score 176 runs and 179.Which is easier..3 runs by 1 player or 3 runs by 10?Or you want me to take your maths classes too,now?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sachin is only for making record himself not
by rocky on Nov 11, 2009 07:56 PM
Great to know that there is maths involved in all this. Sachin scores 170 plus in one match and in other 5 matches of the series he is not having a total of 175 (correct me if he scored more than 175 as u r good in maths ;)) Let me know the mathematics behind this. If u want i can take cricketing lessona for u :)
At least one day of productivity saved from going down the drain. Otherwise everybody would have wasted the day by concentrating on this match rather than on productive work.
On second thoughts though, feel pity for the Poor Betting Fraternity; A WHOLE DAY OF BETTING GONE DOWN THE DRAIN, so to say. Their whole day's livelihood was wasted........
Re: Good!
by LG on Nov 11, 2009 08:20 PM
Pat Thakur you some people always have strong urge to show that they are smarter than others, but in real life they are the fools. You proved that you are one of them.
