Re: Forget Hatred...Live in Peace...Worship one true GOD
by anil pillai on May 26, 2009 06:22 PM
What you know about hell? Whether you visited there? Whether your father visited there? Whom you are worshipping? Mr.Sayed you are worshipping artifical god.There is no scientific evidence.Religion is used by vested interest to control a section of population.Poor chap like you blindly following it.You follow it .no problem.But don't hate other religions.Because that will only increase your BP.Nothing happens otherwise.
Re: Forget Hatred...Live in Peace...Worship one true GOD
by bagula bhagat on May 26, 2009 06:26 PM
Its not about GOD, its about followers. Following and beliefs' makes a GOD.. be it one or many. be it associated or single. Sorry to say you dont follow even the only SINGLE ONE you are having because you are not at all devoted to HIM rather you are concentrated with devaluing other's beliefs. This is not what most of my dear friendz GOD says.. because no GOD says that in the first place.
Just correct yourself, and dont bring shame to that GOD whom you believe and many revered to many others.
Re: Re: Forget Hatred...Live in Peace...Worship one true GOD
by syed jawahar on May 26, 2009 06:28 PM
How can you assign human attributes to the most holy!!!. u are doing the biggest sin than LeT or Taliban...
Afridi is meant to say that he couldnt perform well in IPL I because VVS was captain. May be that he can only perform under Gilchrist. It seems he is like a robot and someone has to programme him to function, otherwise he cannot. He thinks he was selected to play pakistani gully cricket in IPL I. Afridi deserves worst performer award during IPL I season.
Re: Afridi is meant to say something funny
by zakzak on May 26, 2009 06:15 PM
Answer in the same line.He never said that "he can only perform under Gilchrist". He is very clear in stating that the decision that captain should take according to situation is not best from Great Laxman.He is lacking that quality that even Thirumala Shetty Suman can do.I remember one match in the first IPL in which Symonds scored well but he was given the crucial final over to bowl and he gave out all the 20 runs needed for the opponent's win.Can't imagine the good result if this same afridi is given the final over he could have easily beaten the opponent.
It was unnecessary on the part of Gilly to say what he said about Laxman. We love VVS for what he has done for test cricket and his capacity to face Australians in Australia. Gilly's statement was with a view to humiliate VVS for he may have something of the past about Laxman.
Gilly cannot take all the credit for his team's success at IPL 2. It was the team work, and above all LUCK. Why McCullum could not do such a thing ?
Re: laxman is useless for T20 form of cricket
by Shri Hegde on May 26, 2009 07:09 PM
Class is permanent and VVS would have proved that, if he was not put under pressure. All the other oldies from Jayasurya, Sachin to Kallis, Dravid have proved that.
Re: laxman is useless for T20 form of cricket
by Teesmar Singh on May 26, 2009 05:52 PM
Unfortunately this is true. This is why he is not included in ODI Team India.
Blaming Laxman is not correct. What happened to Kolkara Knite Riders ? Changing the Captian is one reason. Second is a circumstances and Luck and chaning the pitch, etc.
Gilchrist is good capitain and he is one of best hitter in the world. I am wellwisher of DC. Wish you Best of Luck and also win next yer. Regard
Re: 'I never meant any disrespect to Laxman'
by Varun on May 26, 2009 06:57 PM
Poor laxman. He should have just taken the icon status and the additional money. Instead he gave it away with a good intent to build a strong team and the aussie pussie he brought in, kicked him out. How many times have we seen this.
Re: 'I never meant any disrespect to Laxman'
by sudhir dhar on May 26, 2009 05:46 PM
In 20-20, decisions are intuitive. Kumble, Gilchrist, Dada, Warne , all have that flair for leadership.
Laxman, Dravid and SRT on the other hand are God's gift to cricket.
Everyone has their own strengths. And we should celebrate that.
After reading this board, it seems to me a cricket match between indo-pak. Rivalry runs deep into us. Let it be so. But my point here is that in both the ipls, it is white who is dictating and doing the roost. See how many white skins are captains and coachs and staff of respective teams. Last year it was OZ Shane and this year it was OZ Gilly not Sachin or Gangully or kumble failed to won the ipl final.Guess who will be the next. That is a million dollar question.
Re: Indo-Pak
by sameerbhaga on May 26, 2009 05:50 PM
Who were the simi finalists? Delhi - captained by sehwag, Chennai captained by Dhoni, Bangalore captained by Anil Kumble. Only Deccan were captained by a gora. Even Punjab that narrowly missed the semi final was captained by a desi. Fortune beat us twice, but we are getting there
After reading this board, it seems to me a cricket match between indo-pak. Rivalry runs deep into us. Let it be so. But my point here is that in both the ipls, it is white who is dictating and doing the roost. See how many white skins are captains and coachs and staff of respective teams. Last year it was OZ Shane and this year it was OZ Gilly not Sachin or Gangully or kumble failed to won the ipl final.Guess who will be the next. That is a million dollar question.
Re: Indo-Pak
by subra on May 26, 2009 05:38 PM
no white or black KKR had best whites and they were at the bottom.Brown b"lore reached finals.As a captain,Player Yuvi was inconsistent,Delhi was lucky to reach semis inspite of poor captaincy by Viru,Dhoni had poor fielding&bowling combo It is all clear ib b/w that a sensible strong captain backed by enthusiastic lads of DC have won
