Dear members....we have good allrounder like Irfan Pathan....why we can't give him chance to play in the elleven instead Munaf - Though he is a good bowler, but not a good batsman/fielder. I think it is injustice to him........(orkay)
Re: regarding fast bowler
by love on Mar 21, 2009 07:37 PM
irfan has lost his credibility as a bowler we dont need a batsman,we r in search of gud thord seamer
Stop this ridiculous agenda of yours. We are just as much proud of Zaheer as we are of Sachin. We all hope that Munaf turns into a good bowler so that it'll benefit India in the long run. Heck we'd prefer playing with 11 minority players if they are the best India can offer.
But this signaling out minority players and lavishing at them, is actually equivalent to insulting them. It makes them look like inferior. Please, stop this agenda.
Re: Fakruddin Saheb .....
by love on Mar 21, 2009 07:01 PM
he comes with same agenda every match days dont get angry he always has the same thing to say,think he does not belong to minority,or he is a modern east india company agent so better dont take him seriously
Re: Fakruddin Saheb .....
by Sanjeev Mishra on Mar 21, 2009 11:26 PM
How did the minority issue come up. Moreover, Munaf also is from the same community as Zaheer.
if munaf can be 100%match fit for more time, he can be long term third seamer ,he has the accuracy which he can persist with for longer period of times but on the contraray he always has a nack of leting down selection commitie by hididng his inguries,or may be gets ingured more often
Re: munaf is the best option available iffff.........
by Fakruddin on Mar 21, 2009 06:35 PM
correct said love saab minority cricketers always constant performance munaf even injury putting 100% effort to team very couraging person zaheer becoming best fast bowler in india history
Re: Re: munaf is the best option available iffff.........
by love on Mar 21, 2009 06:39 PM
uddin saab we want bowlers to be fully fit,he always has let down every one with his injuries,may be lack of exercise or something he isnt taking care of
Re: Re: munaf is the best option available iffff.........
by Sameer on Mar 23, 2009 02:06 PM
LOL are you serious ? Zaheer and best Indian bowler EVER ? what a joke !!! Did you even see his Average ?
In case this doesn't ring a bell --- KAPIL DEV " simply the best fast bowler we have had to date"
It has been 14 years since he retired, we still do not have a fast bowler of his class.
Re: Re: On Long-term, Munaf as third seamer is bad development fo
by f f on Mar 21, 2009 05:16 PM
You idiot I'm not bothered about majority or minority. Zaheer is the only minority (in your language) who deserves a place in Indian Test Squad. Period. Think India you fool.
Re: On Long-term, Munaf as third seamer is bad development for In
by premraja on Mar 21, 2009 06:18 PM
sree santh and rp are injured. Rp is just recovering > any way he did not set the tames on fire when given an oporunity. selcetion must be performance basd. munaf has done well in this match. only thing he has to become consistent and improve his firleding and batting which is atrocious for international standards
Re: Re: On Long-term, Munaf as third seamer is bad development fo
by f f on Mar 21, 2009 06:24 PM
You are dead right! Munaf does have some natural talent to be accurate. But I feel he doesn't apply much, very careless guy. That's the reason he couldn't do anything in batting and fielding. He has taken his place for granted, that's my worry!
Re: On Long-term, Munaf as third seamer is bad development for In
by love on Mar 21, 2009 06:31 PM
think if munaf can be 100%match fit he can be long term third seamer ,he has the accuracy which he can persist with for longer times but on the contraray he always has a nack of putting down selection commitie by hididng his inguries,or may be gets ingured more often
Re: On Long-term, Munaf as third seamer is bad development for In
by India on Mar 21, 2009 05:28 PM
Munaf got 5 wikets in the match, more than Zaheer or Ishanth. So what you said smacks of personal opinion based on factors other than cricket. Also Munaf was underbowled in the match. The only problem Munaf has is that he is injury prone. RP Singh is not bowling well and Sreesanth behaves like a monkey everytime he is selected. Besides Sreesanth is a distraction to all other players in the team. This team also includes Balaji and Dhawal Kulkarni. Your comments are foolish.
Re: Re: On Long-term, Munaf as third seamer is bad development fo
by f f on Mar 21, 2009 05:51 PM
Yes, the owl and monkey were instrumental in winning world cup for us! Shreeshanth is not distraction but he is a popular one among Indian team. If you go by these terms, Harbhajan should be first removed from the team! Conduct is no more the factor in any field today!
Re: On Long-term, Munaf as third seamer is bad development for In
by India on Mar 21, 2009 05:32 PM
Besides Sreesanth is suffering from back injury and is out of bowling business for 3 months. He is however available for other activities for which he is more famous.
Re: Re: On Long-term, Munaf as third seamer is bad development fo
by Bigindian on Mar 21, 2009 05:40 PM
He is a one match wonder. Remember, this hobbling Munaf single handedly lost India the series decider in Cape Town when Dravid insisted on his inclusion....
Re: munaf half hatrick and zaheer 50 turning point for match
by f f on Mar 21, 2009 05:04 PM
What do you mean by Half-Hatrick? I would have been happy if some other bowler was given chance in place of Munaf even though Munaf turned out OK. In long-term, India should try to groom more & more quality seamers to remain successful abroad.
Re: Re: munaf half hatrick and zaheer 50 turning point for match
by Vamsavardhana Reddy on Mar 21, 2009 05:25 PM
Either a hatrick or a no hatrick. That's all it is. No half hatrick, one-third hatrick. You split evertything.
Re: Re: munaf half hatrick and zaheer 50 turning point for match
by FirstName LastName on Mar 21, 2009 05:07 PM
Fakruddin he is half cut .. that's why he says half hat rick!
