IT IS VERY ESTONISHINT TO NOTE THE ATTITUDE OF ICC TOWARDS INDIA ALONG WITH REST OF THE WORLD EXCEPT ASTRALIA. WHY SUCH DISCRIMINATION. HAD THE SAME THING HAPPENED WITH ASTRALIA THEY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BOTH 40% CUT IN MATCH FEE OF PLAYERS AND BAN ON CAPTAIN. I PERSONALLY BELIEVE 10 T0 20% CUT IN MATCH FEE WOULD HAVE BEEN SUFFICIENT AND FAIR ENOUGH. BY BANNING CAPTAIN THE RESULT OF THE NEXT TWO ODIS CAN GO AGAINST INDIA. SHAME ,SHAME POPY SHAME FOR ICC. SHEKHAR GUPTA, JAMMU
Re: DHONI BAN
by gaurav manchanda on Dec 19, 2009 05:59 PM
well said bro. BCCI uses their money power to grab matches, posts in ICC but they never use their money power for the players' cause (except Bhajji episode & that was also due to the indian fans pressure)
Re: DHONI BAN
by Against Pseudos on Dec 20, 2009 08:25 AM
Guest:
Thanks for the update. Please point out the things when they happen. We are not interested in your flights of fantasy. :)
And if you are so much against ICC, why the heck do you watch the matches arranged by them and make so much noise when they declare India as number one in their rankings? ;-)
In order to win matches, Team need match winners. If any team requires 60 runs off 35 balls with 5 wickets in hand, then 30 runs scored off 15 balls are of more use than the 40 runs scored off 30 balls. A number 7 batsman always need to score runs at a very healthy strike rate. he shud also be able to survive under pressure and at the same time put pressure back on the opposition team. Jadeja cant do this. he tumbles under pressure (T20 world cup match, India vs Australia ODI Hyderabad). he also puts more pressure on his fellow batsman through his foolish run attempts. he may be more economic as compare to yusuf pathan but as a wicket taket yusuf pathan is better than jadeja. jadeja's bowling average is 71 whereas yusuf pathan bowling average is 37 (almost half of jadeja). As a number 7 batsman his strike rate is just 73 whereas yusuf pathan's strike rate is 118 at number 7. a bowler who gives 58 runs in 10 overs and take 1 wicket is much better than a bowler giving 50 runs without taking any wicket. In his career, yusuf pathan has won 3 matches for india single handily whereas Jadeja has thrown away the matches which india has almost won. Yusuf has won number of T20s for his IPL team whereas jadeja didnt have won even a single match for Rajasthan Royals.
I think Dhoni did not give attention before 2 batting PP, we saw Indian team was taking too much time in field arrangement, but still i think ban for 2 matches is not proper, but this would give MSD chance to rest, because all of you must have noticed that at the end of his inning MSD was looking very much tired, so this would definitely give him chance to rest.
Re: Re: Before batting power play
by Len Hutton on Dec 19, 2009 05:59 PM
U may be right Man, but see people salutes to success and no doubt and he is right now successful captain.
Re: Re: Re: Before batting power play
by LG on Dec 19, 2009 06:08 PM
Len Hutton, Yes, some people, who are superficial, may give credit to an incompetent boss of a successful team. But, I bet you that such organization cannot sustain growth and success for long.
Re: Re: Before batting power play
by Kempt Killer on Dec 19, 2009 07:52 PM
and even if someone take their own decision - like ganguly - you people will again write foolish comment against him
Because of my profession,I have chance to visit and know people from different countries and what they think about Indian people in general. Indians are infamous for
1. Never taking responsibility for their action and always putting blame on others
2. Never following the rules and always looking ways to misuse rules and regulations
3. Exploiting belief and trust of other people in them
4. Believing that being rude is being confident
5. Believing that to be able to cheat is to be clever and smart.
6. They will not think twice doing things for which they condemn others--like racial abuse, misusing power, partiality, etc.
So, why is there so much fuss about if a Indian Captain is ban for his fault.
Re: Typical Indian Reaction about the ban
by asim mohanty on Dec 19, 2009 05:59 PM
correct if dhoni has done the mistake then he should be suitably punished and the whole media has hyped dhoni, nobody should be a hero this is team game coordination is the need of the hour
Re: Re: Re: Typical Indian Reaction about the ban
by Against Pseudos on Dec 20, 2009 08:28 AM
FG:
:) yeah. . . since you are a bigger House Maid than LG, we must believe you 100%. :)
The whole world knows that Indians are the most renowned ones to follow rules, and hence the Indian traffic system, the Indian no-bribe system, and th Indian infrastructure is the best in the world. Barack Obama has recently stated this in the United Nations, right? :)
Re: I feel.......
by deepak vijayalu on Dec 19, 2009 05:39 PM
I don't feel like that. May be JEff crowe should be given captaincy.. Then he will know the time factor which play a crucial role in thrilling matches like this.. Please remove the ban of M>S>D.. I watch cricket only because of m.S>D captaincy.. I can't imagine a Indian team without Dhoni
Re: Re: I feel.......
by Against Pseudos on Dec 20, 2009 08:31 AM
DV:
I suggest you watch the next match. Then you can very well imagine a Indian team without Dhoni. Who knows that that team might actually win the next match too, unlike the one which we lost. :)
