RE:Re: Kabeer / Shetty
by Kabeer on Jan 11, 2008 05:40 PM
Dear Girish,
My post is not related to what Kumble said or did not say. I was only referring to the popular misconception that was discussed repeatedly by the sensation seeking print and electronic media that Aussie team in this test match repeatedly cheated the Indian team to win the match.
Regarding your second point you are also echoing more or less what I have said. Mike didnt cheat; at worst he would have been unwittingly told that he took the catch clean.
RE:RE:Re: Kabeer / Shetty
by raj on Jan 11, 2008 06:19 PM
i take your point. but somehow its not convincing about the unwittingly accepting someone else's telling about his catch. aussie tam is a tech savvy team. they analyse the opposition, they have all the gizmos, they have universities bristling with sports scientists who give their batsmen great bats, great techniques. they are the single most dedicated bunch of crickters. and after all that yu've gotta be kidding if yu say they wouldnt go to the dressing room and review the day ? man, ive seen 'em on tv checking the replay of their dismissal on live tv! dude, they are good for sure, but c'mon it was grassed, and pretty sure he had a good hard look at it, and declared it as "unsure" " someone told me that" " i was busy with proceedings that day"
RE:Re: Kabeer / Shetty
by ashish on Jan 11, 2008 05:02 PM
dude there are other sports in india tat need attention ,for now lets stand up for the kings of cricket -australia
RE:Re: Kabeer / Shetty
by Chihahua on Jan 11, 2008 05:09 PM
U shut up and scooot from here. You don't support India. I can understand your breed. You are the people who points to rich businessman and say that's my dad to your Girl friend. And you point to your dad and say "He is the servant". How come you have born to mother India
RE:Re: Kabeer / Shetty
by raj on Jan 11, 2008 06:15 PM
girish. well said. im afraid, ashish isnt ready to accept a good point!
well you can holler for all times to come that this team is good, and has been the winningest in their time. cool. but, ahem, would you mind ? we have someone making a valid point, we have all eternity to think of other sports, and we already know who's the best.
1. ausies r not responsible but aussie cricket board, captain, umpires and icc r responsible.
2. yuvraj's decision was not out. he didnt knick the ball to slip and stood though knowing he knick the ball just like clark.
3. 3rd umpires r provided for cricket matches officially to resolve issues and to clear uncertainties. As it is there in official manner it has to be used.
If u r anti-indian or australian sh...ut ur ba...ck and mind ur business. If u r Indian get out of the country right now.
Now dont say who am i to say getout to u. Indian constitution have provided right to act against anti-nationalist for all citizens of India. this right is one among 10 duties and 10 rights provided to citizens of India.
RE:@ Arjun TJ and onlooker
by ashish on Jan 11, 2008 04:53 PM
hahah go tell tat to tat papaji bhaji who behavin liek an angel ,uncouth as ever he shud be happy symonds didnt trash him lol
RE:@ Arjun TJ and onlooker
by Indian on Jan 11, 2008 05:04 PM
@ashish:
Arjun, TJ and Onlooker are well bought up in your opinion coz they agree wid ya..
you see not many wud appreciate your taking sides with Symonds. An objective observer will tell you that if Harbhajan is uncouth, then Symonds is double uncouth. Yet you say Bhajji is lucky Symonds didn't trash him..
RE:RE:@ Arjun TJ and onlooker
by ashish on Jan 11, 2008 05:11 PM
why isnt the obivious clear for all to see ,papaji is an uncouth no question bout tat ,see the jats in punjab loud and crude
RE:@ Arjun TJ and onlooker
by ashish on Jan 11, 2008 04:59 PM
yes i love the coungtry but id love it more if indians went filthy spittin paan litterin peein on da roads ,the list is endless,hear of the n ew year molestaion case ,disgrace
RE:@ Arjun TJ and onlooker
by Serious Cricket on Jan 11, 2008 05:53 PM
Dont worry he will wipe his moronic face with paper... fit for nothing damn bugger stop ur anti indian antics... we know that u wipe their ass with ur mouth
RE:@ Arjun TJ and onlooker
by TJ on Jan 11, 2008 05:33 PM
Kare, got it, what I was probably trying to explain was that Rawl was not as threatening as an experienced spinner to take wickets of amla & smith jus as a cakewalk. Would you also tell me why the umpiring blunders and grassy catches were not racked up in SA vs WI? Just because that SA were confident on their game and want it all by their own instead of blokes & interviews on missing in action by their own men?
RE:@ Arjun TJ and onlooker
by Why Care on Jan 11, 2008 04:55 PM
ashish- pray enlighten us on your parentage and upbringing before you pronounce judgment on others'? and TJ and onlooker are Indians? joke of the new year. keep talking, someday you'll talk something intelligent.
RE:@ Arjun TJ and onlooker
by ashish on Jan 11, 2008 04:57 PM
why care indian but an aussie fan ,any problem in admirin world champs? i love brazilian cricket too
RE:RE:@ Arjun TJ and onlooker
by Chihahua on Jan 11, 2008 05:05 PM
You don't support India. I can understand your breed. You are the people who points to rich businessman and say that's my dad to your Girl friend. And you point to your dada and say .He is the servant. How come you have born to mother India?
RE:RE:RE:@ Arjun TJ and onlooker
by Indian on Jan 11, 2008 05:17 PM
@ashish:
tis very well that you left india.. its a relief as much for them as much for you not to look into your backyard..
btw i wud like to know which part of the world u r in right now where the poor are sought out and are put up in the presidential suites in 7 star hotels? :-)
RE:@ Arjun TJ and onlooker
by ashish on Jan 11, 2008 05:09 PM
speak for ur self dude,tats why i left india cause i see how the poor are treated -- shame --- look into ur back yard there must be a watch man gettin trashed cause he is poor
RE:RE:@ Arjun TJ and onlooker
by Indian on Jan 11, 2008 05:12 PM
@ashish:
surely no one plays cricket the way aussies play it mate... they have forever changed the meaning of the sentence "its not cricket"..
"its not cricket" was supposed to be said when someone saw something happening which was not sporting, morally correct, or was unethical...
the way aussies play cricket, "its not cricket" will be uttered when someone upholds truth, behaves admirably, does something sporting, or helps someone in need.
Absolutely, no one plays cricket like the aussies play it mate.. the whole world watched it in Sydney in Jan 2008. :-)
RE:RE:@ Arjun TJ and onlooker
by ashish on Jan 11, 2008 05:01 PM
haha chihahua where does tata come in ,he suire is a great man but he doesnt play cricket the way the aussies do ,killer team ,world champs
RE:@ Arjun TJ and onlooker
by Chihahua on Jan 11, 2008 05:01 PM
Are you considering a rich neighbour your Dad, than your dad himself? fterall he is rich.
RE:@ Arjun TJ and onlooker
by ashish on Jan 11, 2008 05:04 PM
well by ur logic the millions of indians who flee india to live in good countries are those categorr and to correct u sports is not bout rich and por i love brazilaian foot ball too they a poor coungtry if u shud know
RE:@ Arjun TJ and onlooker
by Why Care on Jan 11, 2008 04:58 PM
And onlooker needs assurance from a chat room troll to feel good about himself- am sure even an amoeba in a primordial soup has a higher self-esteem than this.
RE:@ Arjun TJ and onlooker
by TJ on Jan 11, 2008 05:07 PM
Hei Ashish!!! Are you the same Aussiesh?? lol...One of our friend Julian might get a little knocked of your mention of hooligans....while he is not.
Ricky, Symonds , Clarke & Hayden all who gave false proofs of racism charges againt Harbhajan should be banned for life for not only bring disrepute to the game but also playing with the public sentiments of two continents.
