Discussion Board

Nadal crushed as Rosol rocks Wimbledon to core


Total 111 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
manish keshari
nadal fans, don't know what to say now..
by manish keshari on Jul 02, 2012 04:04 PM

poor nadal fans, who try to portray him as GOAT, whereas , he is only the best in clay till date....there is no doubt about that, but be bold enough to accept the fact, that is not an all court and environment (indoors) player....
he is a good player no doubt, best in clay ever no doubt, but lets stop to claim him as GOAT....coz, there is only one GOAT, FEDEX an all court player...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
jayesh Nayyar
federer vs nadal
by jayesh Nayyar on Jun 30, 2012 04:52 AM

In response to a question posed by a journalist at the 2012 French Open regarding whether Nadal is better than Federer, Nadal replied, "I think this person don't know nothing about tennis." The journalist asked why, and Nadal told the journalist, "so you don't know nothing about tennis. You see the titles of him and you see the titles of me? It's no comparison. So that's the answer. Is difficult to compare Roger with me now, because he has 16 Grand Slams; I have 11. Masters 1000, yeah, I have 1 more than him. But for the rest of the things the records of Roger is very, very almost impossible to improve." At the press conference following his semifinal win in the 2010 U.S. Open, Nadal was asked whether his head-to-head advantage over Federer means he is better. Nadal replied, "Head to head is not an element for me. Is a part of the statistics, but is not the decisive element

    Forward  |  Report abuse
jayesh Nayyar
federer vs nadal
by jayesh Nayyar on Jun 30, 2012 04:52 AM

In response to a question posed by a journalist at the 2012 French Open regarding whether Nadal is better than Federer, Nadal replied, "I think this person don't know nothing about tennis." The journalist asked why, and Nadal told the journalist, "so you don't know nothing about tennis. You see the titles of him and you see the titles of me? It's no comparison. So that's the answer. Is difficult to compare Roger with me now, because he has 16 Grand Slams; I have 11. Masters 1000, yeah, I have 1 more than him. But for the rest of the things the records of Roger is very, very almost impossible to improve." At the press conference following his semifinal win in the 2010 U.S. Open, Nadal was asked whether his head-to-head advantage over Federer means he is better. Nadal replied, "Head to head is not an element for me. Is a part of the statistics, but is not the decisive element

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Test User
czech mate
by Test User on Jun 30, 2012 04:45 AM

czech mate !

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Mahendra Gargatti
hi
by Mahendra Gargatti on Jun 29, 2012 06:14 PM  | Hide replies

Boris Becker in Making mark my words

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ByTheWay way
Re: hi
by ByTheWay way on Jun 29, 2012 06:44 PM
he is 26 dear..becker broke into the scene at 17. but this bloke has all the qualities if properly nurtured can ruffle many a feathers.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Pradeep Narain
Tennis
by Pradeep Narain on Jun 29, 2012 06:03 PM

1 Dilip Kumar Amitab Rajesh khanna Shahruk Amir
2 Kishore rafi lata asha
3 Borg Mcenroe pete, Federer Nadal

On thier day they may be better than the other . how does it matter? And

can u ever say who is greater than the other. They have their own orbit

let us be happy we have seen them perform. let that be our joy

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Bhanja Bhusan
Federer is better
by Bhanja Bhusan on Jun 29, 2012 05:35 PM  | Hide replies

From the temperament Nadal is best.From the attitude Federer is the best.Any answer.But the fans never compare both.They are all time great stars

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ByTheWay way
Re: Federer is better
by ByTheWay way on Jun 29, 2012 06:46 PM
in temperament and attitude rafa is miles ahead. but as far as the game is concerned [the beauty of it] no comparison to roger. but novak is a mix of both now.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Arun Premraj
dfsf
by Arun Premraj on Jun 29, 2012 05:28 PM

nadal could have shown more sportsman spirit in his defeat.. but yes it remains to be seen if rosol can win big tournaments n why hasn't he done so far if he's so talented.... that is a question..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Demons
Okay BOYS, take this
by Demons on Jun 29, 2012 05:22 PM  | Hide replies

Federer Vs. Nadal

In Grand Slams;
Nadal has beaten him in
Grass,
Clay as well as in
This years "Aus. Open Court.

Greatest Fede;

Never beat Nadal
even after 13 yrs. of professional career,
on French Open, Clay.

Most ATP Masters Titles are held by N.a.d.a.l.

Under any case,

Borg is greatest of all because,
Grass & Clay, put together,

Borg - 11
Fede - 7
Pete - 7
Raf - 9.

That's Greatest ever,
Given,

Us Open/ Aus. Open;

One is a money business, &
Other is a colonial Grandeur

and do not, for that reason, constitute
"Pinnacle" form of Tennis to ascertain "Greatness".

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Neerav Kapasi
Re: Okay BOYS, take this
by Neerav Kapasi on Jun 29, 2012 06:18 PM
What about consistency ?? Maximum appears in Final, SF & QF?what abt 8 top players tounament at year end? Please give that statistics.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
selvaraj yonas
Re: Re: Okay BOYS, take this
by selvaraj yonas on Jun 29, 2012 06:27 PM
he can't give because there nobody is near to Federer.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Demons
Re: Re: Okay BOYS, take this
by Demons on Jun 29, 2012 07:23 PM
You consider that,

more "Valuable" than a "Surface Record Grand Slam"!!

to ascertain "Greatness"?

Mature,

that would be my answer!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Demons
Re: Re: Okay BOYS, take this
by Demons on Jun 29, 2012 07:26 PM
As for "Year end Titles,

Borg has a Career 102 titles to his credit..

Given ATP was not there in 1970 Borg eras..

it came to prominence only in early 1980s,

I think that would make up for his "Statistics".

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jay
Re: Re: Re: Okay BOYS, take this
by Jay on Jul 02, 2012 09:25 PM
Heres something to shut your pie hole. It doesnt matter what you say. Here is what all the players who you have on your list had to say about Federer


"[In the modern game], you're either a clay court specialist, a grass court specialist or a hard court specialist – or you're Roger Federer."
Jimmy Connors

"Federer is the best player in history. No other player has ever had such quality."
Rafael Nadal

"I would be honoured to even be compared to Roger. He is such an unbelievable talent and capable of anything. Roger could be the greatest tennis player of all time."
Rod Laver

"He's the most gifted player I've ever seen in my life and I've seen a lot of people play. I've seen the Lavers, I played against some of the great players – the Samprases, Beckers, Connors, Borgs, you name it. This guy could be the greatest of all time."
John McEnroe

"We have a guy from Switzerland who is just playing the game a way I haven't seen anyone – and I mean anyone – play before. He is the kind of guy who can overtake the greatest."
Boris Becker

"He's the best I've ever played against. There's nowhere to go. Anything you try to do, he potentially has an answer for."
Andre Agassi

Grand slam titles (open era):
16: Roger Federer
14: Pete Sampras
11: Björn Borg
8: Andre Agassi, Jimmy Connors, Ivan Lendl


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Unlimited Storage
Go home RAFA
by Unlimited Storage on Jun 29, 2012 05:06 PM  | Hide replies

Lol :)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Venugopalan
Re: Go home RAFA
by Venugopalan on Jun 29, 2012 05:08 PM
no chance he will play doubles ..better you go home

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 111 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
Write a message