After Nadal's withdrawal ,interest in U S Open has already been Lost. Murray and Djoko to stop Federer ??? no way... 18th title for sure in Federer's pocket.
McEnroe further added, “So, bigger beneficiaries of Nadal’s absence may be Roger and Novak. If you asked Roger, although he wouldn’t admit it, he’d be pleased that he doesn’t have to play Rafa because he’s got a pretty bad record against him.”
Re: Good luck, Fed
by Chaitanya NS on Aug 24, 2012 08:21 PM
McEnroe is telling truth., because Nadal have won 8 US open in last 8 years he played there. Fed giving a party to Nadal for the favou,as he never won 5 US open & Novak giving a party too as he couldnt win last year.
Re: Re: Good luck, Fed
by Anuraug Rathor on Aug 24, 2012 10:47 PM
Fed needs to give a party to Soderling,who saved him another demolition at Nadal's hands in 2009 French Open,and let Federer complete his career slam,something he would NEVER have achieved in Nadal's presence.
Re: Re: Re: Good luck, Fed
by bhunu pro on Aug 24, 2012 10:55 PM
in d same way..Nadal shud give party to Fedex for beating Nole time and again..else his fans wud hv less slams to cheer for.. see u need to surf more..
Re: Re: Re: Re: Good luck, Fed
by Father on Aug 25, 2012 03:14 PM
Nadal beat Nova in finale to win slam this year. Apart from FO, It never happen that Fedex beat Nova and Nadal won... Silly argument
Re: Re: Re: Good luck, Fed
by Chaitanya NS on Aug 25, 2012 06:59 PM
ok, so without bringing French open you cant defend above statement by McRoe.. fair enough.
Re: Re: Re: Clay king is history now
by Anuraug Rathor on Aug 24, 2012 03:19 PM
And the next answer he will deliver himself,when he's back.The last time the morons declared him 'history',he came back and won 5 slams and became no.1.So it's good the Rajeshcunts and bhunudickheads are repeating the blunders.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Clay king is history now
by bhunu pro on Aug 24, 2012 03:41 PM
this shows ur level of thinking.. since you have recently started surfing u should check some good behaviour websites as well.. good luck !! U also have English lang issues.. so d above comment is in relevance to further 5-6 years from now.. we will see who lost and who won in HISTORY..Till then u can read W-R-E-N and M-A-R-T-I-N..helps english speaking
Re: Re: Re: Re: Clay king is history now
by rajesh on Aug 24, 2012 04:57 PM
Rajeshcunts? hahaha..someone got angy when i said the truth..hahaha..I wont do the name calling because i am not as cheap as you..enjoy the injuries and come back when u won 17:)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Fed rules..Djoko in line
by rajesh on Aug 25, 2012 03:33 PM
yes you are correct. Federer has won 7 wimbledon titles, and nadal won only 2. You are correct. Maths proves 7>2:)
Re: OK Federer Vs
by Chaitanya NS on Aug 24, 2012 12:48 PM
if something at begining of your carreer matter so much then how about losing 7 straight matches to an opponet when you are no#1-2 in world ? next thing u will put some rubbish 16 Major in 7 years..
Re: Re: OK Federer Vs
by rajesh on Aug 24, 2012 01:58 PM
chairanya, demons comments are always rubbish..If u r new to rediff, i have to say one thing..Dont reply to his comments..we can officialy say that demons comments are most pathetic ever..gives all excuses to prove his favorite player is the best. but yeah we all know his fav player can play well only in clay..Next time he will post comments like "federer is from swiss which is a cool country. so he gets unfair advantage"..or he might post something pathetic than the above comment.wait and read but dont bother to reply(I know i wasted 2 mins but just letting you know)
Re: Re: Re: OK Federer Vs
by Anuraug Rathor on Aug 24, 2012 03:23 PM
Rajesh,unfortunately you waste 2 mins to let a lot of people know every single time,but you cant resist answering because you know there's quite some truth in what Demon's posts.As for Nadal playing well only on clay is concerned,I think that's as ludicrous as it gets and doesnt even merit an answer.
Re: Re: Re: Re: OK Federer Vs
by rajesh on Aug 24, 2012 04:53 PM
I never knew the concept of "If u reply to some post that means the post is true" ..u also replied to my comment..does that means what I said is also true?? You are funnier than demons:)You Nadal fans daily come up with new concepts..But its funny though:)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: OK Federer Vs
by Anuraug Rathor on Aug 24, 2012 10:53 PM
I thought you said whatever you said because you thought it was true??So it isn't??ROFL.You're right,it's quite funny but the laughs on you.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: OK Federer Vs
by rajesh on Aug 25, 2012 03:29 PM
ok as usual you dint understand..You said if someone replies to someones comments, the first comment is true..So if you are replying to my comments, u accept that my comments are true?? if so, then u accept that nadal is a clay court specialist because you replied to my comments..sorry for missing the important word.."red" clay court specialist..So if you reply now, that means you accept that what i am saying is true(according to your weird concept)..c ya:)
Re: Re: All the best, who ever wins..
by deepak on Aug 24, 2012 10:39 AM
best lost against the player whose rank is just 36.And u call him as the best.best is worst now
