Correct very very much, followers will raise different view as usual for only to protest and to follow blindly, not or need not understanding the facts, self as well as country condition which is deteriorating day by day, believing false statements, promises of PM(Prachar or Pakora Mantri), ruining self and their next generation future.
Correct very very much, followers will raise different view as usual for only to protest and to follow blindly, not or need not understanding the facts, self as well as country condition which is deteriorating day by day, believing false statements, promises of PM(Prachar or Pakora Mantri), ruining self and their next generation future.
Patel had told Nehru that he would get the pakistani troops vacated in 24 hours. But idiot Nehru went for a ceasefire. This is why Kashmir problem still exists today, and this is the context of Modi's speech as well. The author doesn't touch up on this fact. Sometimes, historians too need to be unbiased.
Re: Modi meant patel would have driven away the pakistan army
by Satheesh KR on Feb 12, 2018 12:10 PM
Who are historians ?. People suddenly woke up recently and started award wapsi drama, who were in payroll of Cong & communist for long time wrote indian history that was dictated by one family.
Re: Modi meant patel would have driven away the pakistan army
by Gladyschellam on Feb 12, 2018 12:14 PM
Yes Had Babar and British not entered India , there would be only one religion in India. This type of problem would not have risen.
Only failed leaders could use 'ifs & buts' - successful leaders always think of their tenure most, as to how that they could take up to higher level and for the future.
Re: Re: Modi meant patel would have driven away the pakistan army
by Soumitra Goswami on Feb 12, 2018 12:24 PM
You all mean to say we should start again from Babar or even earlier. Bravo you really deserve not in present India but the ancient era when starapas used to fight for accusation of land and to loose to another. I do not know if you doubt about that history too.
Re: Re: Re: Modi meant patel would have driven away the pakistan
by Gladyschellam on Feb 12, 2018 12:38 PM
When quoted 70 years ago what happened (assumption), just I quoted some 700 years ago.
Whoever be the ruler, would have different problems. Facing the problem is the leaders caliber and capacity - but stating reasons have no meaning in it. As a citizen of India, I think of the future and not like to think of my grand father's days.
Patel had told Nehru that he would get the pakistani troops vacated in 24 hours. But idiot Nehru went for a ceasefire. This is why Kashmir problem still exists today, and this is the context of Modi's speech as well. The author doesn't touch up on this fact. Sometimes, historians too need to be unbiased.
Such cheap reporters or journalists get their credentials by putting gun on other shoulder like so called rajdeep barkha dutt....india doesn't have problem with Pakistan or china as long as we have such Jaydev like reporters in INDIA.
Just because all those who accepted the leadership of Gandhiji went by the name of Indian National Congress, it does not mean that all those subscribed the post-independence philosophy of the Congress. People like Ambalakkat Karunakara Menon, a descendent of the Zamorin who gave up all his earnings for the freedom fight, were a frustrated lot seeing the direction of the Congress after independence. So it is erroneous to classify all of them as part of today\'s Congress.
