Now it is fashion to blame as sexual harassment. This remind me one Bihar case when a girl alleged that she was raped. When people talked then appeared the man has done nothing wrong as her definition of rape was imaginary. Neither the person has used even bad language, he simple told he will not discuss issue of enemity with a girl but his father with respectable person comes then only discussion will happen. They virtually made case for his arrest but unfortunately one Postman and one teacher was also sitting there which this girl and his family did not realise. That resulted truth out. When asked what is arpe girl told hand on my neck.
Ha has . This episode I have seen and now with me too. Let us take Sona case with Anu Malik. What stopped her raisig this now and not then?? EVen true this gives reason for not speaking then?? I know one case when Woman was promoted for favour but for some reason when one year she was not rewarded, she complaint. WHere did crime used to happen, outside office, she had no answer as thiswas 7 year case. SO when allegations made, immediately COmpany should have asked his version of story. ANd then proof of issue to be collected. Then stop both from office till enquiry is over. This must be completed by 15 days. But we all busy settling score.
All the truths will come out soon. He took one of the female employees to a restaurant where it is alleged, he spiked her drink with some drug. then he took advantage of her when she was in that inebriated state and then dropped her home. At home she vomited and when the inebriated state wore off, she and her friend accosted him. The next day, she complained to the GENPACT authorities and they immediately suspended him. He is obviously guilty. If a man is not guilty, why would he commit suicide? Also, Vishakha guidelines were not followed as they cover only workplace harrassment. This happened outside company premises.
Re: Re: Re: He was a cr_ook
by Amod Karnik on Dec 26, 2018 09:53 PM
Are you saying he was innocent? If he was innocent, wouldn't he want to live and prove his innocence? The suicide confirms the guilt and not just the guilt but the revulsion from society that he would have to face.
Re: Re: Re: Re: He was a cr_ook
by Atanu Chatterjee on Dec 27, 2018 12:59 AM
Thats a convenient narrative suiting your side of the story. Since the proofs and evidences are neither available in the public domain or evaluated by a trustworthy organization, the best we can do is to give the accused the benefit of doubt i.e. 'innocent till proven guilty'.
Re: Re: He was a cr_ook
by Amod Karnik on Dec 26, 2018 09:55 PM
An innocent man would not commit suicide. He would fight the legal case, prove his innocence and then file defamation charges against the parties. Those charges could run into millions. He would really have become a rich man. But is he innocent?
Re: Re: Re: He was a cr_ook
by Adarsh Chanakya on Dec 26, 2018 11:49 PM
May be you were involved in trapping him. Nowadays, men are using women against another man to settle scores. But even if he was guilty, he should be given a fair chance to put his point according to the law. You are not above law, nor is Genpact.
Re: Re: Re: He was a cr_ook
by Adarsh Chanakya on Dec 26, 2018 11:49 PM
May be you were involved in trapping him. Nowadays, men are using women against another man to settle scores. But even if he was guilty, he should be given a fair chance to put his point according to the law. You are not above law, nor is Genpact.
Re: Re: Re: He was a cr_ook
by madhav gokhale on Dec 27, 2018 02:58 PM
Sort of sympathising with the gals arn't u dude. Hope you also get screwed like this which will make you realise the agony, the horror of being removed from place of working of a decade.Only become someone is a female, doesn't means she is right. That bloody law is lopsided, which enables morons like you to sit on judgement like this
Re: He was a cr_ook
by Story editor on Dec 26, 2018 09:25 PM
How do you know? If you really have proof then ok, else you should also be booked for mudslinging a dead man.
Re: He was a cr_ook
by vinay joshi on Dec 27, 2018 08:14 PM
Amod Karnik, you are a fool of first degree, for talking disrespectfully of a dead person. You will not commit suicide even after murdering someone, because you have a very thick hide.
Re: He was a cr_ook
by vinay joshi on Dec 27, 2018 08:15 PM
Amod Karnik, you are a fool of first degree, for talking disrespectfully of a dead person. You will not commit suicide even after murdering someone, because you have a very thick hide.
All the truths will come out soon. He took one of the female employees to a restaurant where it is alleged, he spiked her drink with some drug. then he took advantage of her when she was in that inebriated state and then dropped her home. At home she vomited and when the inebriated state wore off, she and her friend accosted him. The next day, she complained to the GENPACT authorities and they immediately suspended him. He is obviously guilty. If a man is not guilty, why would he commit suicide? Also, Vishakha guidelines were not followed as they cover only workplace harrassment. This happened outside company premises.
Re: Guy was a crook
by anil nigam on Dec 26, 2018 02:28 PM
Name of the hotel visited ???? Time of visit???? CCTV coverage where swaroop and the women can be seen together. The bill of the hotel???? The kind of drink ordered???? Where was the other girl when drink was spiked???? Besides there are many other unanswered questions????? Was dismissal a procedure as per the Visakha Guidlines without any enquiry, Plase do not be emotional ??? Women can be spiteful and use her gender without thinking twice. More so if she is not able to get promotions / good reports in ACR. etc. Wish truth comes out and theses people are punished for many years of jail if Swaroop was right
Re: Guy was a crook
by bnj jha on Dec 26, 2018 04:32 PM
SIr, Have COmpany took all evidence at its table? COnfirnted the employee? I had one experience, when female employee started drinking and halfway party she started vomiting. Npo one was ready to drop her in car as that car will be dirty and who will take responsibility. It was not company function. I had to drop her. Change her cloth got medicine to stop her vomiting. Whole night I had to be there awake. Next morning when she got normal after tea, I left and found she was least aplogetic. Had this happen now, she may say I changed her cloth and took advantage.
Re: Guy was a crook
by Atanu Chatterjee on Dec 27, 2018 12:48 AM
These are still charges mixed with assumption. What you described could easily be a case of food poisoning that caused the person to feel sick and dizzy and then subsequent vomit. To me its a hasty action from Genpact that created a bigger mess.
Female co workers should stop thinking that their male countepart are sitting in office to entertain them. Male counterparts are entitiled to mind their business and ignore them. Modus operandi of certain females in officeis to bad moth / assasinate character of male counterparts if they feel ignored
Re: Re: first and foremost
by Nitesh on Dec 26, 2018 08:46 PM
Such incidents vindicate people who believe women should be confined to homes and not suited to work outside.
