One will automatically become tolerant if another is really striving for our country. Why is a person intolerant? The other one comes, occupies our sympathetically given space take us for a rise with an attitude that it is he who is entitled for ruling us . or a cut above our own law. If that doesn't happen no one will be angry and go against any community r personalities. Play within our rules and regulations shown by the majority.
Sri Ansari Ji held constitutional post of great India for 10 years. But his last statement ‘A sense of insecurity is creeping India’ has put the question on violation of oath to defend the integrity of Nation ? It looks he is upset for questioning ‘Azadi’ in JNU, irregular appointment of officials VC/Directors in Minority institutes, and minority appeasement schemes. A family always enjoyed top positions in the country for last 70 years and today he feels in secured ? His expression needs to be introspected and shouldn’t be taken casually as it is certainly planned strategic move.
Re: Hamid Ansari: induced communal disharmony?
by paul theo on Aug 12, 2017 10:42 AM
HIS VIEWS ARE HIS PERSONAL VIEWS , BASED ON THE PRESENT SITUATION IN INDIA, NOTHING WRONG
He was holding such a high post for 10 years, we all had a high regard and respect for him irrespective of which community he belong to. In all communities there can be say 5% of people who spread communal hatred, otherwise we all respect each others religious rights. Mr. Hamid Ansari should have talked something which had some more relevance, especially in this kind of tense situation at the boarder with China he should have talked about our brave soldiers guarding our Country and should have asked the fellow citizens to stand united for the welfare of the nation. Really sad to hear such a high profile person talking such silly things at his farewell speech.
Re: Wish ex VP talked something else to inspire the people of Ind
by daniel thorat on Aug 12, 2017 12:04 AM
Mr. Ansari spoke about the most relevant, important and urgent matter fast developing into a national crisis. The China problem has certainly been mishandled by our govt. We all know that China is a very strong nation, stronger than our country, and we need to handle and solve it diplomatically, not by thumping any 56 inch chhati. No amount of whisking Xi jing direct to Gujarat or sending Doval to China has been of much help.Flexing muscles and the rhetoric can only be good for home consumption. What is weakening our beloved country is different, and Mr. Ansari has spoken of that.
Re: Re: Wish ex VP talked something else to inspire the people of
by Jitendra Trivedi on Aug 13, 2017 12:03 PM
Mr. Daniel ! Please consult some Neurologist.
This man after enjoying all luxuaries has shown his mettle at the time of retirement.This fool was a national waste,like one woman in office as president;as she was wandering all countries with an entourage of 100 relatives;like a spendthrift.These wretched were selected by SONIA and associates and were like her.
when such influential people speak of intolerance then how come none of this people speak up when Hindus Or christians across the world & in holy places like Amarnath yatra are shot dead as they non muslims. Its sad that such a wise person should make such statements only for his community & has no respect for the majority community sentiments.dragging politics to this post was unwise.
Re: VP speech
by Shyam Sunder on Aug 11, 2017 09:42 PM
Words like Secularism and Tolerance have become fashion. First ask him if his religion allows him to wear Coat, Suit and keep a French Beard. If he is not following his own religion properly how come he find fault with others for nothing?
Re: Re: VP speech
by pk kh on Aug 11, 2017 10:51 PM
They maintain double standards I have seen Farooq Obaidullas vidio with girls which is forbidden and would attract capital punishment as per their laws but there a t J&K people follows him...they are wolf in sheep hiding.
Most shocking is the fact that he was a Diplomat and worked in various capacities but always remained a M. He always went on diplomatic duties to those countries where his people were there. He never felt the major part of the country should also be benefited by his service since he is paid from the taxes paid by the majority. He never had allegiance to the nation but remained truthful to his group and his political party only. And very unfortunately, even being well educated and well helped by this nation, he never thought of Budhists, Jains, Christians, Anglo-Indians, etc. who also constitute minor proportion of the population but thought of only the second largest group in the country. I wonder whether he is not aware of the chaos created by his loved brethren throughout the world and what can happen to India if his people become majority here! He should know the situation and reason behind the situation in J&K. At least a good riddance after ten years.
