https://www.change.org/p/narendra-modi-al-kabeer-and-allana-abbatoir-in-hyderabad-break-several-rules-ban-cattle-slaughter.then decide, I am sure if are a human being with soul, will change your opinions.
Dear madam please go to the link https://www.change.org/p/narendra-modi-al-kabeer-and-allana-abbatoir-in-hyderabad-break-several-rules-ban-cattle-slaughter.then decide, I am sure if are a human being with soul, will change your opinions.
Dear Madam, Please go to the link https://www.change.org/p/narendra-modi-al-kabeer-and-allana-abbatoir-in-hyderabad-break-several-rules-ban-cattle-slaughter. Even after reading the article in the link, you think cow slaughter should not be banned then you are the most soulless human being on the earth.
The author seems to be a confused person because at one place she is saying that eating meat is not good for the environment and the same time she against the ban. For the information of the author, chicken is much more cheaper than beef. If meat is such a necessity then why not switch to chicken instead. Secular does not mean that you practice your religion and do not care for sentiments of other religions. Secular means you practice your religion and at the same time respect other religions sentiments. In India it has become a norm and fashion with the so called secularists to bash the majority community and protect the interests and sentiments of minority community. When they think of only one community then how can they are called secularists?
How animal sacrifice saved whatever little Hinduism that remains in Bengal.
British looked at other European powers as competition. And after what happened in north and south America, they did not want Europeans in Asia. They saw emotions around crusades a natural barrier.
This is what led to the Famine Raj of the British in India(artificial famines and social engineering).
In Bengal the great Gurus allowed animal sacrifice at industrial scale to cut the supply of Siraj ud daula-British supply lines. So Animal sacrifice is as Hindu as anything else. But what is wrong is industrial cultivation of animal and slaughter.
We need to go back to Gandhi Ji and VB. Patel way, small farmers cooperative movement.
Re: silent opposition
by Pinaki Pandit on Apr 04, 2017 12:15 PM
I mean lord Krishna did not tell us what to eat, he told us the difference between foods and asked us to choose depending on what we wanted to achieve in life. But the British wanted to brainwash and defame us in Europe and to the middle class in India. They called us castist, a nation of snake charmers and what not.
Re: Re: silent opposition
by Pinaki Pandit on Apr 04, 2017 12:22 PM
It is not true, we always had a choice. A Guru could always give different name. Even a virtues king could do that, Lord Rama is said to have done it, and there are millions of such examples.
Re: Re: Re: silent opposition
by Pinaki Pandit on Apr 04, 2017 12:36 PM
If animal sacrifice wrong? what is the industrial farming of Animals and slaughter?
Re: Re: Re: Re: silent opposition
by Pinaki Pandit on Apr 04, 2017 12:38 PM
It is industrial production of milk that is pushing small farmers to the brink and pushing the prices down and consumption up.
Even though we lose the capability of digesting milk at the age of 5, why do we not look at calcium fortified Soy and other such alternatives?
We have to reduce consumption if we wish to stop cruelty against animals and protect our farmers.
Not against eating meat. Who said someone is? For all the reasons you are saying chicken would suffice. Protein availability etc. Secular does not mean you can kill cow which is sacred to majority. Secularism means respect for all religions and not that we can disrespect beliefs of the Majority. So stop talking rubbish and get back to work -:) author says secularism is very important but the author does not know the meaning of it? Pathetic
Re: I am also
by samsir on Apr 04, 2017 09:17 AM
I am sure all the three reasons given by the author is not the reason why author thinks meat is important. It is due to the fact that nowadays somehow or other prove some brownie points that is all.. absolutely rubbish attitude-:)
Re: Re: I am also
by Raghunaathan on Apr 04, 2017 10:46 AM
Excellent reply. Wrong si(e)cular approach written with sole purpose of opposing Hindu tradition and values . Sunita, we dont care who you are and what is your intention but things will not work for you guys anymore.
Re: I am also
by Ratish Kr. Dey on Apr 04, 2017 10:08 AM | Hide message
Instead of beef pork can be eaten by beef-eater. The meat of tortoise is another substitute.
Re: I am also
by SUDHIR SINGHAL on Apr 04, 2017 10:40 AM
Sunita Narain is a thorough hypocrite
If we stop thinking commercially.....we would rather agree with what you are suggesting.....stop producing cattle in turn as this will accommodate your understanding of consumption theory.....only humans are arranging methods to produce more cattle for commercial benefits.I strongly condemn these ideologies(so called) that we need to kill cattle. Why can't you take human's as commercial byproducts why innocent animals.Reason is simple that we human's are greedy and senseless creature.....so please think humanely and not insanely......
Re: i support ban
by shh Ten on Apr 04, 2017 10:26 AM
yes that's true. That's knowledge .If one can eat meat for nourishment-I would say human meat is most nutritious ,because we eat the best nourished food
This is a totally biased post. In India, rearing animals is based on the fodder available as a by-product of farming. Hardly farmers sacrifice the crops for growing fodder. Animals do contribute significantly towards the economy of farming. AMUL is a wonderful example of use of animals in the growth of farmers and Nation. It has been found REDIFF repeatedly posts such information which is against the interests of nation.
All killing of animals should be strictly banned: a) It is unethical. Why dont we kill humans and sell the human meat? b) Animal dung makes natural fertilisers which are extremely good for safe crop. Chemical fertilisers are causing too many diseases and crippling health issues. c) For example, cow urine is safe and the best pesticide. d) Meat eating is a beastly act. It is insensitive. It makes one just beastly. These are just a few points. There are many more good points.
Re: meat
by pk kh on Apr 04, 2017 09:10 AM
On one hand Farmers are not getting proper return for their produce like Potato,Tomatos,onion to name a few and are throwing it on ground,roads and meat lovers are thriving on meat only.Why this people always suffer.Non-Veg should be limited to keep species alive and their should be balance.Nobody will die if Beef is banned.and wont hurt exchequer as well.
All killing of animals should be strictly banned: a) It is unethical. Why dont we kill humans and sell the human meat? b) Animal dung makes natural fertilisers which are extremely good for safe crop. Chemical fertilisers are causing too many diseases and crippling health issues. c) For example, cow urine is safe and the best pesticide. d) Meat eating is a beastly act. It is insensitive. It makes one just beastly. These are just a few points. There are many more good points.
