Indian removal was a policy of the United States government in the 19th century whereby Native Americans were forcibly removed from their ancestral homelands in the eastern United States to lands west of the Mississippi River, thereafter known as Indian Territory. That policy has been characterized by some scholars as part of a long-term genocide of Native Americans[1] by European settlers to North America in the colonial period and citizens of the United States until the mid-20th century.[2][3] The policy traced its direct origins to the administration of James Monroe, though it addressed conflicts between whites and Native Americans that had been occurring since the 17th century, and were getting worse by the early 19th century as white settlers were increasingly pushing west. The Indian Removal Act was the key act that enforced Indian removal, and was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830.
No doubt development is necessary. The adivasis should also understand that mineral exploitation is one of the basis of development and that natural resources is available where they are now. At the same time the Government should also see their problems genuinely.Their environment has to be protected at any cost.The modern amenities of development has to be provided by the government in and at their environment. Though through the latest MMDR (amendment) act this particular situation has been addressed by the Government through the Prime Minister Khetriya Khaniz Kalyan Yojana with the District Mineral Foundation, which about to take off. The onus of telling to these group of adivasis of course lies with the Government.Now it is as early as better.
Re: plight has to be addressed.
by orchid united on May 10, 2016 09:00 PM
mr dung square should seriously contribute to the welfare of his people by joining hands with present progressive govt instead of running towards hypocrites who have only filled there pockets
Re: Re: plight has to be addressed.
by vidwan soni on May 10, 2016 09:17 PM
Chide-is this Govt a progressive? Rather it is regressive!!Going back to 14th century ideology.Open your eyes.
Re: Re: Re: Re: plight has to be addressed.
by ram manohar on May 10, 2016 10:29 PM
No need to reply to our vidwan the so called PHd . In actual he is just a muslim with prejudice
Re: Re: Re: plight has to be addressed.
by Against Pseudos on May 11, 2016 02:52 AM
Sudwan Phoney: Good. There was no global warming in 14th century. People were peaceful. Thank god. :-)
Re: Re: plight has to be addressed.
by JMGautam on May 11, 2016 09:37 PM
My english is weak. Don't know the meaning of 'mr dung square'.You may be understanding better. Go by text; hands are already joined with the present progressive govt.The only problem that regressive person like you are not allowing to take the message to the really affected people and misguiding them as this is the very true colour of a hypocrites.So the need of the hour is to shed away this chemelon skin.
This Adidas has written books that means his ownership straight indicates natural resources are plundered. Our prime minister degree also came for questioning. We must respect the lives within the jungles otherwise money power will run this government.
It is not Modi but people of India who suffered enormous damages due to a minister who was acting like an activist & these goons who were preventing development in name of protection of forests.
Re: Two Naxalites shaking hand
by Che Guevara on May 10, 2016 08:52 PM
u baniks r real anti-national. two decades back Shotgun Sinha had made this statement and common people had acknowledged the same then.
Re: Re: Two Naxalites shaking hand
by larissa sams on May 10, 2016 09:20 PM
DONT B TOO NARROW MINDED. UNDERSTAND THE GOOD WORKS OF OTHERS. SEE THE FACTS WITH OPEN EYES. IF U DONT BELIEVE THE FACTS PRESENTED HERE. GO AND DO REALITY CHECK.
Re: Re: Two Naxalites shaking hand
by Against Pseudos on May 11, 2016 02:57 AM
Yawwwwn... Zzzzz. Just labelling ppl with anti national and intolerant and communal and whatnot makes you an Einstein. ROTFLMAO
