Mr. Akbar Patel be happy with your hybrid name. Why do you want every one to have a hybrid name like yours. This shows you are not tolerant. So learn it first before preaching. This shameless rediff has no credible writers with tthem. So they are publishing this kind of articles.
Re: Digest this
by jb kar on Oct 30, 2015 03:13 PM
Now you want Marathis fight with Gujratis and Odia with Biharis (Emperor Asoka was from Magadh whic is now a part of Bihar in the name Patna) by citing some hand picked paragraphs from History
Re: Digest this
by human on Oct 30, 2015 04:05 PM
jb kar.. If it is wrong, why dont u correct it, that is if you know better or more about it. And names are not u r or someone else's property ..
Re: Re: Digest this
by saurav ghosh on Oct 30, 2015 04:26 PM
Hi to my dear friends and Particularly to Mr. Akbar patel
The first sign that you are not liking the statement of mr. naidu and writing against it and secondly you are not feeling proud when any of your countrymen is speaking high of his nation (offcourse yours also) is revealing that you are just a citizen and you are that loyal to the country or perhaps too much biased against the hindus and their glory. It is known to everybody south asia was conquered by indians but if you are drawing similarity between your loved british , mughals and afagns , you are nothing but deliberately unnoticing the impact and effect of one civilation upon the other. In your point of view there there is no difference between budhha and julius ceaser . You are that class of people who can never belief that anything beyond my imagination is possible. if you cannot find a ram or harishchandra in other civilization , then you conclude that there are myths. India is enemy of herself..nothing else.
Re: Digest this
by Kaz King on Oct 30, 2015 04:30 PM
Read properly its Aakar Patel not Akbar Patel. First you learn to read and write properly, before preaching the world. How can you comment on others when your English itself is in mess, see "tthem". What is this. Try to digest the truth this author is conveying. No hard feelings. Take Care
Re: Re: Digest this
by desi twist on Oct 30, 2015 11:15 PM
Have you heard of "sarcasm"? JB Kar was just being sarcastic. Most of you pseudos don't use your brain, so difficult for you to understand...
Is your NGO still working in India ? you look to be frustrated man and anti Modi too, but Natural, because , Modi Govt. closed your NGO shop. So uttering some irrelevence is possible.Of course Hindus are not tolerant to the extent that they allow foreign NGO's to destroy India and its progress.Indians will not permit any foreign country to exploit NGOs for their benefit. We are more alert.
Re: Mr. writer
by Bhasmasur Rakshasa on Oct 30, 2015 11:01 PM
Great reply to that fhaggot Aakar Patel......don't know who gave birth to such a low life despicable being....
Akar very little knowledge you have.First of all let us know which hitory have you read : 1.History written by European 2.History Written by indians I am sure you would have read the first type of it.After all u, me and all are Lord MacAulay's student.
Re: Spread of English language will decrease this kind of fantism
by aditya agarwal on Oct 30, 2015 02:16 PM
For your kind knowledge english is the weakest language of the world scientifically . And Snskrit is the topest so stop barking rubbish.
Re: Re: Spread of English language will decrease this kind of fan
by SELVARAJ RAJKUMAR on Oct 30, 2015 04:00 PM
And hence Sanskrit based methodologies are practiced and spoken in major part of the world.
Re: I'm Hopeful
by siddhartha ghosh on Oct 30, 2015 02:01 PM
Although the atrocity and violence of some radical groups of a particular religion can’t be compared with those incidents. But What I mean to say is that the modern, tolerant, peaceful face of Hinduism has been modified over a long period of time. The beauty of this great culture is that it was somehow open to criticism and debate. And in the process many menace in Hindu culture like “Sati-Daha”, “Balya Vivah”, “Untouchability”….etc has been stopped/reduced. Credit goes to many social reformers, philosophers and great thinkers. Their jobs were never been easy and had faced lots of hardship. But still I’d say, there was a space for debate in traditional Indian culture. The fight is still on, long way to go. The same is true for other religion as well who are more or less peaceful and open for change.
Re: Re: I'm Hopeful
by siddhartha ghosh on Oct 30, 2015 02:01 PM
I think most of the Indian Muzlims hold the golden distinctions of being moderate and believer of peaceful coexistence. There is a historical reason behind it, but that is a separate discussion. But still the hold of maulviz over the community is very strong and there is very little scope for reform in Muzlim thinking. This issue is compounded due to the abysmal educational, financial and social condition of Muzlim. Our Goverments did practically nothing to uplift their condition. This issue become even complex due to the minority syndrome. Nobody dared to talk about any reform in Muzlim personal law. It remains unchanged from 1935. Similarly Bangladesh has 12% Hindo population, but Hindo Law there remains where it was on August 15, 1947. By contrast, Muzlim Law has undergone changes in Bangladesh and Pakistan). In the subcontinent there is a minority syndrome, which is deepest here in India. But day by the day sane and rational voices are increasing within the muzlim comminity. Hopefully, these illiterate moulaviz will become insignificant and true face of “Religion of Peace” shall be revealed. By that time it is responsibility of bigger cousin to act against the venom spread by these Togarias and others.
Emperor Ashok had one of his famous pillars in Kandahar and I doubt that it was put up out of respect: He probably raided or threatened to raid if the Afghans did not submit. The above line is telling dear sir,history ia about facts not hypothesis please get ur facts right
Emperor Ashok had one of his famous pillars in Kandahar and I doubt that it was put up out of respect: He probably raided or threatened to raid if the Afghans did not submit. The above line is telling dear sir,history ia about facts not hypothesis please get ur facts right
