Discussion Board

'OROP for jawans is justified. Not so much for officers'


Total 114 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
LD Sharma
OROP
by LD Sharma on Aug 26, 2015 11:31 PM  | Hide replies

Kindly tell Sudhir Bisht to stay for a few days (not weeks/months) in any Army forward post and then come back and write the story. BSF and other paramilitary also do a fine job but please do not equate it with the Armed Forces which lead the operations. The BSF does not lead any attack!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: OROP
by Against Pseudos on Aug 27, 2015 11:42 AM
LD Sharma:
By your logic the officers should also be made jawans and NCO / JCO. Right?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Anand YNI
'OROP for jawans is justified. Not so much for officers'
by Anand YNI on Aug 26, 2015 09:43 PM  | Hide replies

Send all these fellows to Kargil or Siachen Glacier and ask them to spend 15 days there. If ever they come back in proper shape, they will jeep their orifices closed for ever and agree for OROP!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sudhir Bisht
Re: 'OROP for jawans is justified. Not so much for officers'
by Sudhir Bisht on Aug 26, 2015 09:53 PM
BTW, I have commanded an oil depot in Kargil for > 15 days, when it was freezing

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Anand YNI
Re: Re: 'OROP for jawans is justified. Not so much for officers'
by Anand YNI on Aug 26, 2015 10:38 PM
Did you read the Koshiari Committee report?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
LD Sharma
Re: Re: 'OROP for jawans is justified. Not so much for officers'
by LD Sharma on Aug 26, 2015 11:31 PM
Commanding an Oil Depot does not make you a combatant.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sudhir Bisht
Re: Re: Re: 'OROP for jawans is justified. Not so much for office
by Sudhir Bisht on Aug 27, 2015 12:12 PM
Dear LD Sharma Sir,
Are all Army Officers in combatant role?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Anand YNI
'OROP for jawans is justified. Not so much for officers'
by Anand YNI on Aug 26, 2015 09:23 PM

If the Prez, Vice Prez, Ministers, all the worthless MPs and most importantly all the Group A bureaucrats can get OROP, then the soldiers have a stronger case. Apparently the author has not gone through the Koshiari Committee report.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
dillip tripathy
Service Condition
by dillip tripathy on Aug 26, 2015 08:58 PM  | Hide replies

When someone joins a service, he is aware of the nature of service, the pay , perk and pension attached to it. Therefore to demand more than the benefit agreed upon is not fare. It is fallacy to belief that only defence people are patriot and others are not, they need to be treated diferently. What about police and other paramilitary forces? Every other day there is incidence of persons belonging to paramilitary forces being killed ? what about them?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
LD Sharma
Re: Service Condition
by LD Sharma on Aug 26, 2015 11:33 PM
We know what a great job the Police do in this country. Taking bribes at every street corner! Equating them with the job of soldier guarding the borders is pathetic.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
pranay pradhan
Re: Re: Service Condition
by pranay pradhan on Aug 26, 2015 11:46 PM
so you mean no one in army are corrupt. go and see their lavish life after retirement.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
dhoop yukta
OROP Justification
by dhoop yukta on Aug 26, 2015 06:23 PM

The writer has not gone deeply into the matter. Obviously, the longer an Officer serves, less will be the advantage of OROP to him. Soldiers who retire in their 30s will benefit more, as they should. The writer has totally overlooked the fact civilian government employees have benefit of NFFU which helps all of them to retire with the pension of a Lt Gen, so how can they say give us OROP too.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Dhruba Sarma
OROP
by Dhruba Sarma on Aug 26, 2015 05:17 PM  | Hide replies

It's not just about the pension . Tied to it is the status vis-a-vis the babus which had been steadily brought down .This carachter is just trying to create a rift within the armed forces .

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: OROP
by Against Pseudos on Aug 26, 2015 05:35 PM
Read the article first. Then comment.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
vijendra s
OROP
by vijendra s on Aug 26, 2015 05:13 PM  | Hide replies

I fully agree with OROP but please give some more time to Mr.Modi.The congress people fooled them far so long please give NDA 3 more months

    Forward  |  Report abuse
human
Re: OROP
by human on Aug 26, 2015 06:49 PM
so within 3 months they will clear this.. modiji told u this?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vikrant Kanwal
I totally agree with Mr. Sunil Bisht
by Vikrant Kanwal on Aug 26, 2015 04:16 PM

No doubt these all facts are correct and Govt should grant OROP to them but on Govt terms only as there was no contract for OROP.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Vasu Venkataramania
OROP
by Vasu Venkataramania on Aug 26, 2015 03:18 PM

Now that is an eye opener

    Forward  |  Report abuse
mina arora
rules
by mina arora on Aug 26, 2015 02:31 PM  | Hide replies

pension rules should be same for all

    Forward  |  Report abuse
anil nigam
Re: rules
by anil nigam on Aug 26, 2015 03:02 PM
Are the working conditions of defence forces same as of a babu sitiing in Delhi.????
Is the retiring age same for defence forces and other govt employees????

Is the tenure of all govt servants is 2-3 years at a place.
Is there a govt service wherein a person is transferred from an area of -45 degree temp to 45 degree temp.
All the above and many mre discomforts are faced by the defence forces, the pension rules can not be the same for all as Apples and oranges can not be equated.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: rules
by Against Pseudos on Aug 26, 2015 05:14 PM
Then how can you equate jawans with officers? Explain.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Joy Kutty
Re: Re: rules
by Joy Kutty on Aug 26, 2015 06:03 PM
Govt. cannot descriminate its employees whether he is sitting in Ac rooms or in the warfront. if OROP is granted there is going to be a turmoil among all govt. employees. the govt employees who retired in 1980's are getting less pension than the employees retired in the year 2000s

   Forward   |   Report abuse
human
Re: Re: Re: rules
by human on Aug 26, 2015 06:50 PM
Nobody is forced to join Army. They dont allow normal civilians, secondly they take only children of ex-army.. so why all this fuss? What is written in appointment should be followed.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
human
Re: Re: Re: Re: rules
by human on Aug 26, 2015 06:53 PM
As myself was rejected as I was normal civilian..one can check the records u will find more than 80% are children of Ex Army.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
LD Sharma
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: rules
by LD Sharma on Aug 26, 2015 11:43 PM
Mr "human" forget about any records. The very fact that you admit you were rejected means you are a reject material.

Forward   |   Report abuse
LD Sharma
Re: Re: Re: rules
by LD Sharma on Aug 26, 2015 11:41 PM
Mr Joy Kutty you are probably a babu sitting in Delhi or Ernakulam. The entire country knows how much work is done by a typical Govt employee!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Joy Kutty
Re: Re: Re: Re: rules
by Joy Kutty on Aug 27, 2015 11:13 AM
Sharmaji - out of our approx.12 million defence personnel how many are in the border areas. In can say very negligeable. Rest of the personnel are not having much work to do, either simply sitting in the offices or sleeping in bracks, eating and drinking.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Re: rules
by Against Pseudos on Aug 27, 2015 11:48 AM
LD Sharma:
The entire country is also seeing the avarice of ex servicemen.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Anand YNI
Re: rules
by Anand YNI on Aug 26, 2015 09:18 PM
I request all of you to read the Koshiari Committee report before offering your comments. Thanks

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 114 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
Write a message