Discussion Board

The real reason why India scuttled Pakistan talks


Total 593 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Gurmeet
NEW DREAMS ON KASHMIR
by Gurmeet on Aug 20, 2014 06:12 PM

Kashmir for Pakis was almost a done and dusted issue until an M P from the newly formed state called Telengana , questioned India,s hold on this territory and also her state Telengana which she said does not belong to India and was forcebly merged into the Indian union. Pakis got stirred up after her speech to this effect in Parliament. Name of the M P is K Kavitha. Congratulations to her and people of her state
for awakening their fellow brethern in Pakisthan.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
vikas sharma
M K Bhadrakumar its time to change your view
by vikas sharma on Aug 20, 2014 06:01 PM

Dear Bhadrakumar, India after 67 year see non congress government with full majority so just take your time for reaction and leave the policy that "Nothing will change". You are look like pa-pet who is paid by pro congress or so called secular people

    Forward  |  Report abuse
shyam pal
wow! what an analysis?
by shyam pal on Aug 20, 2014 05:28 PM

Now we know why our foreign relations are in shambles. With people of such caliber and intellectual vacuum appointed as ambassador we ought to be where we are.Mr ambassador, what an awful piece of trash you have written?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Yogheendran
INDO PAK Talks on hold
by Yogheendran on Aug 20, 2014 05:09 PM

Will you please ask your handlers in Pakistan or the Pakistani Ambassador to call the displaced Kashmiri Pandits for talk instead of separatists? Then we can understand your logic.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
V DHAR
cancellation of talks
by V DHAR on Aug 20, 2014 04:57 PM

this write-up does not say anything new except giving me a rude reading,dear rediff stop this type of .....?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Jalim Jallad
Re: Modi may have had electoral arithmetic
by Jalim Jallad on Aug 20, 2014 05:06 PM
Ah ha !! really u must feel very bad that your patron party who had been providing u free lunch has been kicked out. 85 percent of Indians have seen what the crooks of the cong party has achieved in 65 years. No need to defend their crooked designs

   Forward   |   Report abuse
piri
Re: Re: Modi may have had electoral arithmetic
by piri on Aug 20, 2014 05:07 PM
Beg your pardon?

I wrote that there is no difference between the Congress and the BJP in any policy matter!

Did not notice ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mast Qalandar
Re: Re: Modi may have had electoral arithmetic
by Mast Qalandar on Aug 20, 2014 05:17 PM
Piri is just a pathetic cretin looking for free publicity as he has no other talents.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Abhishek Thakur
Laughable
by Abhishek Thakur on Aug 20, 2014 03:49 PM

Did the writer mean to say that ManMohan Singh had a roadmap to better relationship with neighbours, forget Pakistan?
Did anyone had a better roadmap? Perhaps I K Gujral had- but what did Gujral doctrine achieve vis-a-vis Pakistan? Our intelligence agencies pakistan unit was shut down. What then?
Even Vajpayee did not have much of a framework. Musharraf organized the Kargil adventure, usurped the crown and then Vajpayee invited him to Agra. What for? Did he really hope anything could have been achieved?
Perhaps the author studied a lot of left liberal balderdash in the 60s or 70s- its time he woke up and smelt the coffee

    Forward  |  Report abuse
AUGUSTINE DIAS
what your article means
by AUGUSTINE DIAS on Aug 20, 2014 02:56 PM

This writer indirectly literally means that India should give up KAshmir, should allow beheading of our soldiers & do nothing, should allow brewing of separatist elements within the country & sit on it, should allow India to become another jihadi islamic country, must not retaliate when the rangers at the border fire across the border, is this what the writer wants India to do? Call Pak & Kashmiri militants & hand over kashmir to them over a ceremony

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 593 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message