Discussion Board

Why objections to the Vande Mataram are not valid


Total 389 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >   >>
ratanlal purohit
Those who are bent on dividing India
by ratanlal purohit on May 14, 2013 06:29 PM  | Hide replies

In two nation theory should not have stayed in Secular India to raise their ugly head in disrespecting National song anthem and standard. Traiters should be treated as per law.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
ritesh sharma
Ignore him
by ritesh sharma on May 14, 2013 06:24 PM  | Hide replies

The best is to ignore him..ban him from contesting next election...All these are publicity stunts...Quite possible he has not done anything worthy during his tenure...So just raising controversies..next year is election..u c...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ritesh sharma
Re: Ignore him
by ritesh sharma on May 14, 2013 06:28 PM
Also surprising...Behenji is so quiet...maybe its her ploy...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
SHAN BAID
UnwarrantedControversy
by SHAN BAID on May 14, 2013 06:17 PM  | Hide replies

TheControversy over vande Mataram is over cooked and unwarranted and is progeny ofOrthodoxy.First of all muslim clergy is unnecesarily calling the shots.Mother India is just a symbol and bowing doesnt mean worshipping,it just means respecting just like you respect your biological mother.Hynd00 outfits on the other hand set it as criteria of patriotism which is just too much.national anthem has higher place and mandatory as per constitution(even that has exception)and muslims donot have any reservation against it.There is a better way out however. why not adopt 'Sare Jahan se achchha' as national song which has good meaning,melodious,understandable to common folks and acceptable to all except perhaps Hynd00Bigots,though the same is well adopted in army.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
samcarto
Re: UnwarrantedControversy
by samcarto on May 14, 2013 06:30 PM
Why should the country change for a minority of its people? This is not one community's country alone. This mentality is unique to this community. Where they are majority there is complete religious intolerance, where they are in minority they ask for special considerations. The simple rule is one cannot have the cake and eat it too. Before citizen rights comes the citizen duties. If one cannot take up the duties then please move on to a place where the duties are palatable.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
SHAN BAID
Re: Re: UnwarrantedControversy
by SHAN BAID on May 14, 2013 08:45 PM
Sam,its not about changing the stand but adjusting without muchSacrifice.We have better option in the form of "sare jahan se...' which is as patri0tic as "vande..'.In multiplicity,we need to adjust here and there of course withoutSacrificing the basic tenets.for instance,if other form of non-veg is available why c0wSlaughter be res0rted to if it hurts theSentiments of a section of society!we have an option out there.so insisting forCow meat is simplyDogmaticAndMischievious.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sabina jamshed
Re: Re: UnwarrantedControversy
by sabina jamshed on May 14, 2013 09:37 PM
This particular minority is 150 million strong...a good reason to heed its views

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Prasad KakeanKrishnoth
misinterpruting holy quoran
by Prasad KakeanKrishnoth on May 14, 2013 06:09 PM  | Hide replies

such lunatics to go and settle in pakistan

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Total 389 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >   >>
Write a message