Re: Will Telengana be the first Muzlim state, after separation
by jaitelangana on Sep 30, 2012 11:50 AM
Why would Majlis oppose Telangana if Telangana will be the first Musslim state? Why will the BJP support Telangana, if Telangana will become the first Musslim state? Your arguments are deprived of logic.
Re: Re: Will Telengana be the first Muzlim state, after separatio
by Sans S on Sep 30, 2012 11:58 AM
Majlis and BJP are supporting telangana for votes. That is the logic here.
Re: Re: Will Telengana be the first Muzlim state, after separatio
by National Highway on Sep 30, 2012 12:08 PM
BJP supporting telangana to get few votes on subregional differences whereas Majlis opposing to avoid BJP dominance in telangana region.
Re: Re: Re: Will Telengana be the first Muzlim state, after separ
by jaitelangana on Sep 30, 2012 12:09 PM
That itself shows that Telangana will not be a Musslim state. Case closed.
It becomes no 1 state in terms of development.We get our own liquor to drink. We get our own state to do pirovies. We don't have to work. Round the year we get our own thaadi. We get our own sleep.unlike stated by PM MMS money plant grows in every house of telangana.
Re: After getting separated telangana will prosper
by jaitelangana on Sep 30, 2012 11:48 AM
Telangana will become prosperous because we will not have corrupt leaders from Seemandhra governing us and destroying our beautiful Hyderabad. Can you imagine a corrupt leader like Jagan getting elected? It is utterly shameful and only Seemandhra people are capable of doing this. Please keep your Seema factionism and your Andhra arrogance to yourself. We want to live like decent human beings.
Re: Re: After getting separated telangana will prosper
by brookie on Sep 30, 2012 11:53 AM
Do you think regional leaders are corrupt free.
It will be all hunky-dory in the beginning how freedom fighters for India would have felt in 1947, now they die everyday looking at our dismal record on devp but world records in corruption.
Re: Re: Re: After getting separated telangana will prosper
by jaitelangana on Sep 30, 2012 11:57 AM
I do not think that regional leaders are corrupt free. But if you take into consideration the current Indian State, it is no doubt that Seemandhra leaders are setting records in corruption.
Re: Re: Re: Re: After getting separated telangana will prosper
by brookie on Sep 30, 2012 12:00 PM
No doubt one YSR is equal to 60yrs of AP corruption. But he earned on Jalyagnam.
when Telengana form, they intend to take up water projs nothing but money spinners, so KCR might even cross YSR.
So when corruption bleeds devp, how a separate state devp?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: After getting separated telangana will prospe
by jaitelangana on Sep 30, 2012 12:05 PM
Your allegations against separate Telangana are merely in the hypothetical realm. KCR may have his drawbacks, but is in no way comparable to YSR.
Re: Re: After getting separated telangana will prosper
by Sans S on Sep 30, 2012 12:01 PM
Hello...KCR is No 1 corrupt fellow. He was once caught red handed with fake currency with another MLA. do you want more details on that?
Re: Re: After getting separated telangana will prosper
by National Highway on Sep 30, 2012 12:19 PM
You comment here and the so called agitation are clearly illustrating how decent you are. 1. KCR aka Dubai Sekhar (Visa scam is leading the agitation. His family collecting money in the name of agitation. 2. Prof. Kodanrami Reddy promotion as professor (obtained PhD only in 2003 and always in agitations) is questioned by UGC? 3. Several cases pending on MP Madhu Yakshi and his family in USA. 4. Gudesala Venkataswamy and his family is well known for land grabbing. 5. Several ministers from telangana in YSR and current govt. are under CBI enquiry.
It is stupidity to blame other regions for your own problems. Seema-andhra or telangana politicians are no different from the rest in India.
The aspirations of telangana people cannot be curtailed by using force. The government should not behave in a partial manner by arresting telangana activists with out any reason.
Re: Aspirations of the telangana people
by National Highway on Sep 30, 2012 11:41 AM
The demolition of statutes on tank bund and public property during similar kind of previous march and naxxalites support for the current march are reasons for increase security to protect public and its property from goons.
Most of Telenganas want sparate state, why not they speak and get concensus with other parts of the state to solve this issue. Instead they bang general public, why cant they bang politicos.
Re: Why not Telengana
by jaitelangana on Sep 30, 2012 11:37 AM
Normal people in other parts of the state are not against telangana. It is only vested business and political interests from other parts that want to stall a separate state.
Re: Re: Why not Telengana
by brookie on Sep 30, 2012 11:40 AM
Why cant all MLAs, leaders deliberate pros/cons in public fora or Assembly and arrive at concensus what is best. rather than hitting the roads and throwing life out of gear.
Re: Re: Re: Why not Telengana
by jaitelangana on Sep 30, 2012 11:43 AM
You have very high regard for the intelligence of politicians. It is rare to see politicians debating rationally on any topic, leave alone telangana. When most people of telangana want a separate state that itself should be a reason for granting separate state. The question that vested business and political interests from Seemandhra should answer is this - why should the state not be split, when the normal people of seemandhra do not really care?
Re: Re: Why not Telengana
by National Highway on Sep 30, 2012 11:47 AM
According recently NDTV poll survey, 76% from seema-andhra opposing AP bifurcation. Does this poll survey indicate normal people from seema-andhra are supporting telangana? AP bifurcation would be disaster for both the regions and therefore any normal person in AP should oppose the separation.
Re: Re: Re: Why not Telengana
by THOMAS SEBASTIAN on Sep 30, 2012 03:43 PM
This NDTV survey is nothing but Sakshi TV survey. NDTV being the consultant to Sakshi TV. My own interaction with folks on that side suggests they are not so bothered about it. Their main concern seemed to be welfare of Jagan and when he will be CM.
These idiots ran buses under police protection during Sakula Jannula Samme. But now they are withdrawing this. Best criminal brains using criminal laws for criminal purposes.
Well if people think the same way like you "Kollipara" at the time of 1950's Andhra state wouldn't have bee n there. You would have been in Madras. Never would have got chance to have Hyd Haleem
Re: Telangana
by Talisman on Sep 30, 2012 10:45 AM
This is not 1950s. This is 2012 and we have people's growth to worry about. By dividing the country in pieces and giving it to different power hungry politicians, how does it help the ppl in the region?
Today, you will ask for a division based on language. Tomorrow, there will be another based on something else. Wher does it stop?
Re: Dividing based on religion, region, language is bad.
by ganesh kumar on Sep 30, 2012 09:34 AM
Please grow up to understand this problem.FYI telangana was a seperate state before 1956 and now wanted to be a separate state within the Indian Federation. On the same basis how Andhra state was formed.Kashmir wanted secede from India.
Re: Re: Dividing based on religion, region, language is bad.
by Talisman on Sep 30, 2012 10:49 AM
Telegana may hv been a state in 1950's. It no longer exists. Pakistan was with India in 1940's. It doesn't mean we have to go and change these things after 60 years because it s convenient for some politicians.
My ganesh you spell out three things that the people in the region gain by this action. If you cannot, please keep your peace.
Re: Dividing based on religion, region, language is bad.
by anniyan on Sep 30, 2012 09:43 AM
Yeah... it is very easy to provoke emotions of masses. That is what politicians are cashing on. If people start thinking and avoid getting emotional, it would be better for our country.
Why can't the central Govt respect regional aspirations & declare Telengana state! It is a part of India so that Seema Andhra people need not fear.High time this done with out any further delay!
Re: Telengana.......
by anniyan on Sep 30, 2012 09:24 AM
Why didn't you ask the central govt to do the same and form a separate country for Kashmir as most of the Musl ims are asking for that.
Re: Re: Telengana.......
by trivandrum padmanabhan on Sep 30, 2012 09:31 AM
That is called partition of our motherland & in this case it is within our own country!
Re: Re: Re: Telengana.......
by anniyan on Sep 30, 2012 09:38 AM
If only emotions matters' who cares... what is it. I don't see point in Telangana agitations at present situation. A lot has changed after formation of Andhra. Anyways I am not against it or for it though it is meaningless.
Re: Re: Telengana.......
by ganesh kumar on Sep 30, 2012 09:32 AM
Please grow up to understand this problem.FYI telangana was a seperate state before 1956 and now wanted to be a separate state within the Indian Federation. On the same basis how Andhra state was formed.Kashmir wanted secede from India.
Re: Re: Re: Telengana.......
by anniyan on Sep 30, 2012 09:40 AM
Atleast use google. Telangana which was part of Hyderabad was not even part of India before 1947. Would U be asking for a separate country for that matter. Infact before the moghals and britishers came to India, it was all small provinces and kingdoms... do you want to be there...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Telengana.......
by ganesh kumar on Sep 30, 2012 09:46 AM
Telangana was a state when hyd was merged into indian union. In 1956 they created AP by merging it with Andhra based on some agreements which were never followed by Andhra. Since then there was this agitation going on in spells.If interested search more for telangana. But if you are from Andhra forget it
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Telengana.......
by National Highway on Sep 30, 2012 10:59 AM
Telangana was part of Hyd state (16 districts), which was dismantled and merged with 5 districts of Marathi speaking region with then Bombay state, 3 districts of kannada region with then Mysore state and 8 districts of telugu (aka telangana) region with then recently formed Andhra state to create AP. So unlike Andhra state, telangala was never been a state. It is pity that those who supporting telangana don't have this basic knowledge.
Re: Telengana.......
by Talisman on Sep 30, 2012 10:55 AM
The problem is, there has to be substantial benefit tot he people of the region. Where are your reasons?
If some politician decides he wants to be CM and wants a new state created, India shld do that? Where does this stop?
If this is allowed, tomorrow, we all know the neighbouring countries that create trouble in india, they will sponser some people to start a new agitation or someone like the Thackereys may want to create their own country?
Indians who are patriots will never allow these kind of divisions. Get ahead in life. dont waste it for policians..
Telangana will be a reality. No matter how many foxes howl & create hurdles. No power in the world could stop people's movements. You are lucky that the agitation is still peaceful and you could able express your views. There's an example: In 1955, America introduced a frog "Rhinella marina", to control the pest but it started preying on the native species.Now they are taking measures to eradicate them. So to Resurrect the native species,Telangana has to come.
Re: Telangana
by anniyan on Sep 30, 2012 09:25 AM
that would be the last thing I will be believing. Technically/Logically/Practically it is impossible.
