Though politically directed, separate statehood is based on people aspirations for an identity and not based on any social indicators, as these Politicos frequently claim. Telengana is as backward as Seema or Andhra. There are 14hr powercuts in Andhra same as what a Telengana town face today.
So No development done by any Party but individuals merit spiralled them. Apollos, Dr Reddys are individual efforts (good or bad is different). Earlier it was only intelligence but now it requires richness also to succeed. No politico can change your future.
Re: Peoples aspriations
by vijay M on Sep 30, 2012 12:29 PM
What identity are you going to get in a separate state ? The same leaders will continue to loot you. Your identity in North India is Madrasi and your identity in West is Indian. Nobody cares about Telangana, Andhra or Tamil. You can continue to celebrate your culture as you like in united state also. Why let leaders separate people and take advantage of you ?
Re: Re: Peoples aspriations
by Rudolf Hess on Sep 30, 2012 12:37 PM
if you want to know more about Telangana, contact Amukurajah Das who is preparing a 15,000 page complete reference on Telangana due to be released next month.
Re: Re: Re: Peoples aspriations
by vijay M on Sep 30, 2012 12:51 PM
I dont have to read any reference on Telangana. There is lot of illiteracy among Telangana people and these uneducated, jobless and frustrated youth are being exploited by politicians to make money. That's the long and short of it. Telangana wont get any separate identity or wont become more developed by being a separate state. It will only cause more problems.
The way this are developing, it would be better to have Governors with Governing Councils to run the affairs of the country under an Elected President of India. That way the country will be saving trillions and trillions of rupees which can be used for the development of the ENTIRE count without any discrimination. May be the idea is outdated and even after over six decades of democracy aam admi are still suffering for 'roti, kapda and makan.
Re: A United India
by National Highway on Sep 30, 2012 01:10 PM
You just want to replace one political system (parliament) with another (presidential) but how it will save money. Also if you get Bush Jr (Ex USA president) like president, it would be disaster to the country.
Re: A United India
by trivandrum padmanabhan on Sep 30, 2012 12:27 PM
Good Thought & out of box thought in an a land other wise inhabited by dinosaurs!
For a united India following to be considered :- 1) Abolish all existing states & introduce administrative provinces. 2) Through election reforms regional parties to be banned. 3) Opt for Presidential form of governance. 4) Introduce judiciary reforms & Lokh Pal in totality. 5) Make bureaucracy & Police independent from executive interference.
It is surprising to see in India why only politically inclined movements get success in dividing states, than a genuine people mass movement who come in support but not as part of Political party? TJAC plays to TRS.
Why we needed KCR to lead us than a Jayshankar 10yrs back
Re: Why Political parties alone triumph
by trivandrum padmanabhan on Sep 30, 2012 12:14 PM
KCR is needed for United Breweries for it has dedicated one shift of its production for his consumption!
Re: Question
by vijay M on Sep 30, 2012 12:03 PM
Vizag is a pretty decent city. Hyderabad is the capital of AP. So most of the investment went there and the development is also because of investment from Andhra people and NRIs from Andhra region. Hyderabad was nothing before 1990 and basically resembled some city from Pakistan.
Re: Re: Question
by jaitelangana on Sep 30, 2012 12:08 PM
Hyderabad is NOT what it is due to Andhras. Far from being developed, it was destroyed by Andhras, who are experts in real estate speculation and dealings. As for Vizag, it is no match for Hyderabad. It is not even a decent Tier-2 city. Further, you evade the question of why your beloved Vijayawada is at the rock bottom.
Re: Re: Re: Question
by sudhakar babu on Sep 30, 2012 12:14 PM
The people who is causing disturbing with recent rallys strikes, they are destroying city image in the world.Recently, how many industries went away from the state, you should knoe
Re: Question
by sudhakar babu on Sep 30, 2012 12:22 PM
Hyderabad is capital city that is why most people invested over there.You just see Hyderabad as Capital city. Do not think it's belongs to telangana.The city belongs to everybody in Andhra Pradesh
Re: Question
by THOMAS SEBASTIAN on Sep 30, 2012 12:33 PM
Untill yesterday you people were shouting that Andhra region is more developed than Telangana. Hence the need for bifurcation.Now you say Andhra is undeveloped and dirty. At least now you realised that there was no discrimination. That's probably the reason for the govt's reluctance to bifurcate.
All the MLAs and other leaders in telangana never attempted to improve their constituencies by improving infrastructure, lay roads, see other facilities. they want a separate state to rob and build their properties. Look at Narendra Modi ..who is doing wonders in gujarat. Hope Prof.Kodandaram / KCR learn some ABC from him. I am for United India, United AP>
Re: Why telangana?
by jaitelangana on Sep 30, 2012 11:54 AM
Seemandhra leaders like Rajasekhar Reddy, Botsa Satyanarayana, Jagan Mohan Reddy have also done wonders in corruption. You guys have even looted Karnataka. With leaders like this, the situation of Telangana is unenviable. We want to remove the corrupt scum from Telangana.
