Re: Re: vote for khan-gress
by such jano on Sep 07, 2012 10:06 PM
"mass murderers corrupts", i disagree. Gujarat riots were not the first and not the most fearful, khan-gress has been successful in brainwashing Indian Muslims like you using its 24/7 channels but that is a lie.
Regardless, we only have two choice, as autocratic sharia driven rule is still few hundred away from reality.
Re: Re: vote for khan-gress
by such jano on Sep 07, 2012 10:09 PM
No given that every congress leader speaks like Hazi (on Indian taxpayers (mostly hindoo) money) Maula Land-ur-rahman that is the only inclusion.
Re: nearly 60 years of congressi rule
by BHARATIYAN on Sep 07, 2012 09:12 PM
They should not be given a break they should be given permanent retirement.
of the habit of thinking individually and not as sa group. they are happy if their family is fine. whereas the others work for their religion too. The day the hindus unite is the day they can survive better or else they will be relegated to second class citizens.
A few facts, mister paper commie 'revolutionary, though you won't like it: 1) Gujarat 2002 was NOT a "pogrom"; approximately 800 Muslims perished but over 250 Hindus also died, meaning Modi's administration and the police did act against rioters. 2) Gujarat 2002 is NOT the worst case of public violence. The 1984 anti-Sikh genocide by your favourite party, the Congress and its genocide-justifying Mr. "Clean" PM, and of course the 1989-90 Islamist genocide of Kashmir's Hindus are far more grisly events of genocide. We dare you to produce one article or even a minimal report from your "secular" ilk on those state-sponsored genocide of India's Hindus and Sikhs. Secularists have no business talking of Gujarat. 3) Now that the SIT has exonerated Modi of any role, your predictable howling is familiar. Bet you'd have been singing a different tune had the SIT report been to your liking. At least till now, the judiciary does follow its own processes and not the prejudices and diktats of anti-Hindu and antinational "secularists". 4)After the Ghulam Fai expose, "secularists" in India have been exposed for what they really are - enemies of the nation in the pay of foreign masters. 5) Modi has been elected by the people, unlike the chocolate babas who are sought to be forced upon this nation, but who are repeatedly shown their place. Jaganniwas Iyer
Re: Re: A few facts, Bidwai...
by Jaganniwas Iyer on Sep 07, 2012 09:17 PM
Thank you, Bharatiyan ji. We Hindus have to counter the lies of "secularists" with cold, undeniable and harsh facts, especially when outright lies and fabricated nonsense is marketed by the nation's enemies. Thanks for your encouragement. And my salutations to you too. Jaganniwas
Re: Re: Re: A few facts, Bidwai...
by BHARATIYAN on Sep 07, 2012 09:21 PM
You said it!!! We have to fight nad we will continue our fight against them and one day we will win. JAI HIND VANDE MATARAM
Re: A few facts, Bidwai...
by yadlapalli rao on Sep 07, 2012 08:56 PM
chocolate Boy /Baby Highly corrupt , Criminal mind person we Indian needs but his sir name should be of GANDHI
Re: A few facts, Bidwai...
by Ind Wisher on Sep 07, 2012 09:03 PM
Good one. I don't support such violence but I have experienced violence by Muslims where Hindus were the only killed during the rule of Madhavsingh Solanky, Chimanlal Patel, Amarsingh Choudhary. All Congress CMs. At least there is peace now in the state.
Lets talk of Anti Sikh riots that have been sponsored by Congress in 1984, before we come to what happened in 2002, we are talking of 92 lives vs 3000 something of Sikh lives. Does it mean that a life of sikh is worthless and that of a Moslem is very high.
Re: Re: Re: Re: 1984 Riots
by sarfarosh on Sep 07, 2012 09:00 PM
yeah you are right which courtinindiahas got the guts to challenge the UPAfolks. CBI will act against the judges
Re: Re: Re: Re: 1984 Riots
by sarfarosh on Sep 07, 2012 09:01 PM
yeah whichcourt in indiahas guts tochallengetheupa. the lawminister and cbi willact against them
