What is the big deal if Savarkar mooted the two nation theory? In fact Tilak had said it before Savarkar. Even Ambedkar wrote a book Why Pakistan advocating the division of India. Congies wanted to fool both HIndus and Muslims with their one nation theory, but the muslims were savvy about Congi designs are rejected the idiotic single nation theory.
Re: What is the big deal
by satish mallela on Jan 28, 2011 08:25 AM
dig vijay should be declared mentally sick person and put in hospital.He is the one creating communal disturbances in the country.
Re: Savarkar a traitor
by secret on Jan 28, 2011 06:00 AM
Muslims and commies are capable of making false discoveries like this. I can make a similar claim. Propet was a coward. You know the reason behind my claim.
he can never talk good things.these congress people r the real culprits behind divide between hindus and muslims.whenever muslim community starts to dout congresss ,this guy immediately come forward and start speaking rubbish which causes divide between two communities.its time that all muslims should understand the vote politics behind this.this guy doesnt have a stature to even speak a name of great savarkar.really bugged with his stupid comments î
Re: this guy is an a** hol*
by secret on Jan 28, 2011 05:26 AM
In a way this is good. Hindus will once again be reminded of great sacrifice of Veer Savarkar. Hindus have a very short memory.
Re: Re: Savarakar was a traitor
by Sunil D on Jan 28, 2011 05:27 AM
read history before writing junk here..Savarkar was a coward is a well proven fact..
Re: DikVijay is confused!
by secret on Jan 28, 2011 05:05 AM
. At a speech at Meerut on 16/03/1888 Syed Ahmed (Founder of AMU) refers to the Hindus and Muslims not only as two nations, but as two warring nations who could not lead a common political life if ever the Brits left India. He said, "Now suppose that all the Brits were to leave India, then who would be the rulers of India? Is it possible that under these circumstances these nations, the Muhammadan and the Hindu could sit on the same throne and remain equal in power. Most certainly not. It is necessary that one of them should conquer the other and thrust it down. To hope that both could remain equal is to desire the impossible and the inconceivable".
Re: A good response from digvijay singh
by secret on Jan 28, 2011 03:58 AM
You are another clown who can't be taken seriously. Why don't you use a Muslim id?
Re: A good response from digvijay singh
by Against Pseudos on Jan 28, 2011 06:38 AM
Sunil D:
Funny that Nehru actually put this coward and traitor "thought" into practice... ;-) What does DickVijay have to say about Nehru's admiration of Savarkar's ideas? :)
was not non believer. He tried to unite Hindus and worked hard to eradicate caste system and others problems with Hinduism.
I don't know if he mooted two-nation theory or not, but if he did, i am glad that that saved life of billions Hindus today else just think what would have been their future had the nation not divided.
Re: Veer Savarkar
by secret on Jan 28, 2011 05:14 AM
Any sane Hindu ultimately realizes that it is impossible to coexist with Muslims. Most of them are too fanatic. It is better that they have their separate nations and don't mingle with others.
