Please take a note that Digvijay is more interested in Saffron as there is no chance in Congress coming back to power. Hence he is doing PhD in Saffron by going as early as 1900 and of late there is no significant findings of Congress doings from his Oral dioreah
all the nation should contribute to the expenses of diggy who is unwell, shd be hospitalised for his mentall condition he is going.every body from the rediff forum should contribute for his expenses. may god bless him
I think Digvijay's statement is only partially corect.
Savarkar propounded the two-nation theory -- WITH A DIVISIVE AGENDA -- a good three years before Jinnah popularised it.
But the origin of the theory is of higher antiquity. It was Sir Syed Ahmed of the Aligarh Muslim University fame who first propunded the two-nation theory in the 19th century. Only that he did not see this as disruptive to the subcontinent.
"India is like a newly wed bride and Hindus and Musalmans are her two beautiful eyes..." Sir Syed had said. But unfortunately he had laid the foundations of India's partition.
Re: Partially Correct
by Against Pseudos on Jan 28, 2011 10:18 AM
Harish Menon:
But the fact that Dig Vijay is hinting that Nehru actually actioned the original thoughts of a Hindu Mahasabha leader might be the olive branch Kaangress is trying to extend towards the BJP to garner support in the future... :)
Re: Partially Correct
by Vivek Dev on Jan 28, 2011 10:05 AM
What is the big deal with a one nation theory that is the biggest lie after the flat earth theory?
when did this happen? s terday or day before? something which happend decades ago is now being told about by a guy as though he just woke up from a long coma!
