Discussion Board

The worrying case of the booming jihadi media


Total 451 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
sparx sparx
Freedom of expression
by sparx sparx on Jan 13, 2011 03:26 PM  | Hide replies

Its freedom of expression, if people wont buy them, these magazines will fizzle out

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Santhosh
Re: Freedom of expression
by Santhosh on Jan 13, 2011 03:47 PM
like if nobody cares about crimes, criminals will automatically stop committing crimes ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bharat
Re: Re: Freedom of expression
by Bharat on Jan 13, 2011 04:04 PM
elaborate snatosh what do you mean by this incomplete sentense.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Arvind Singh
Re: @wahaj
by Arvind Singh on Jan 13, 2011 03:16 PM
I thought this message is about Pakistan as the terrorist harbouring and nurturing nation base on money from KSA, grants from USA and arms from Chinese brothers PAKI-CHINI bhai bhai one is reflected in other

Where this safron etc came from...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Wahaj Faridy
Re: @wahaj
by Wahaj Faridy on Jan 13, 2011 03:22 PM
First of all you only talk/assume on basis of hearsay.

write specific things. If they have been done by KINGS and not religious groups / movements, how can muslim masses be accountable.

YES, if muslims support any wrong actions of mulim king, that is ignorance and condemnable


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sahara
Re: Re: @wahaj
by Sahara on Jan 13, 2011 03:34 PM
specific thingss!!!..tell me do hinduss/paganss/idol worshippperss have any place in eslamm

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Wahaj Faridy
Re: Re: Re: @wahaj
by Wahaj Faridy on Jan 13, 2011 03:39 PM
Yes.. As Zimmy (Protected by State) they only pay 4% tax which is lowest compared to nay other system they would live in.

They are free to practise their faith as zimmy


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sahara
Re: Re: Re: Re: @wahaj
by Sahara on Jan 13, 2011 03:43 PM
back it up with reference for qurannn or from shariaa manuall,

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bharat
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @wahaj
by Bharat on Jan 13, 2011 04:08 PM
can you back any thing from vedas or upanishad which you do so proudly?

Forward   |   Report abuse
JGN
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @wahaj
by JGN on Jan 13, 2011 06:04 PM
Bharat, there is nothing equivalent to Besurah 9:29 in vedas or upnashids. Only shamelessMuslims will justifyJizya. It is a mark of subjugation of the nobelievers (including ThePeopleOfTheBook i.e.JewsAndChristians).

Forward   |   Report abuse
Wahaj Faridy
@SUBBU
by Wahaj Faridy on Jan 13, 2011 03:13 PM  | Hide replies

Stories of Forcible conversions by Kings are mostly untrue. They have been circulated by saffron groups to avoid focus on inner weaknesses of their faith that led to a big section walking away in pursuit of Equality.

Kings BTW were least interested in that activity because Izslam!c majority was more scary situation for them...they knew mu zlim majority never cooperates with Kings for religious reasons (like work for resurrection of caliphate)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sahara
Re: @SUBBU
by Sahara on Jan 13, 2011 03:17 PM
just making grand false statementss do not change anythingg, prove ur nonsense from the books written for the "criminall kingss" by their historianns

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bharat
Re: Re: @SUBBU
by Bharat on Jan 13, 2011 04:10 PM
you are alive it means the Kings were genuine.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Kaale Chickne
Re: Re: @SUBBU
by Kaale Chickne on Jan 13, 2011 03:22 PM
Except Chidu,Diggy,Rahul

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Subbu
wahaj
by Subbu on Jan 13, 2011 03:11 PM  | Hide replies

So you agree that you are can held accountable. And you all follow one faith. So the people of this faith can be held accountable. So finally you agree the organisation you follow can be held accountable. If so, whats the reason? Why the entire people are following all these misdeeds? Can u answer

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Wahaj Faridy
Re: wahaj
by Wahaj Faridy on Jan 13, 2011 03:16 PM

We are Only Accountable for:
a) Believing in our Faith.. its book
b) Supporting Caliphate

We can not be held accountable foor deeds of muz lim kings because our faith never accommodated them in first place


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sahara
Re: Re: wahaj
by Sahara on Jan 13, 2011 03:20 PM
@ur r in ur own delusional worldd,

what did the kingss do for which u should not be held accountable??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Wahaj Faridy
Re: Re: Re: wahaj
by Wahaj Faridy on Jan 13, 2011 03:25 PM

everything...like invade you... destroy some temples

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sahara
Re: Re: Re: Re: wahaj
by Sahara on Jan 13, 2011 03:36 PM
and what about forcibllee conversionnss of ur ancestorsss??..or they were so happyy with destructionn and invasionnn that they readilyy convertedd??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sahara
Re: Re: Re: Re: wahaj
by Sahara on Jan 13, 2011 03:35 PM
but does not shariaa law makes jihadd obligatoryy??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bharat
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: wahaj
by Bharat on Jan 13, 2011 04:12 PM
Jihad means to struggle or to strive for survival. tell me which law stops any one to struggle to survive.

Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Wahaj Faridy
@Aastra
by Wahaj Faridy on Jan 13, 2011 02:57 PM  | Hide replies


U got it wrong

I Only meant that Four caliphs were NOT Kings. They were chosen representatives. They ARE part of our History.

We are willing to be held accountable for supporting them.... but none thereaftet



    Forward  |  Report abuse
Arvind Singh
Re: @Aastra
by Arvind Singh on Jan 13, 2011 03:14 PM
I thought this message is about Pakistan as the terrorist harbouring and nurturing nation base on money from KSA, grants from USA and arms from Chinese brothers PAKI-CHINI bhai bhai one is reflected in other

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Aastra
Re: @Aastra
by Aastra on Jan 13, 2011 05:02 PM
Any half baked goose claiming that the greens didnot indulge in forced conversions must read the following works,belonging to greenies.And then they can come and puke here.

Ibid,EpigraphiaIndoMoslemica,MiftahulFutuh,TarikhiAlai...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Aastra
Re: @Aastra
by Aastra on Jan 13, 2011 03:07 PM
Try reading Ibid to know your faulty logic and some brethern of you wants proof, this response applies to him too.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Aastra
Re: Re: @Aastra
by Aastra on Jan 13, 2011 03:09 PM
Responded above.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Sahara
Re: @Aastra
by Sahara on Jan 13, 2011 03:04 PM
so what is ur take on forcibllee conversionnn of ur ancestorss to eslamm by those criminalll kingss??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Wahaj Faridy
Re: Re: @Aastra
by Wahaj Faridy on Jan 13, 2011 03:09 PM

Stories of Forcible conversions are mostly untrue. They have been circulated by saffron groups to avoid focus on inner weaknesses of their faith.

Kings BTW were least interested in that activity because Izslam!c majority was more scary situation for them...they knew mu zlim majority never cooperates with Kings for religious reasons (like work for caliphate)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Aastra
Re: Re: Re: @Aastra
by Aastra on Jan 13, 2011 03:10 PM
Reading Ibid,not a saffron source, will enlighten you,pal.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Total 451 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message