Its a complete failure of GENETIC MUTATION carried out at HARD-WARD on Subramanian Swamy. Just to show other mutated species the action was a deterring show for not accepting the YANKEE doctrine.
Re: GENETIC MUTATION BY HARD-WARD FAILED ON Subramanian Swamy
by nitmohan on Dec 11, 2011 08:37 AM
PARTIAL FAILURE as P.C. is following the YANKEE's doctrine.
POLITICAL will is required which is also known as self respect and national spirit, but it is a GENETIC order, it is not possible with mutated and imported genetic disorders.
When it comes to protect the freedom of speech on the US based social networking sites like Facebook, Google etc. they ask the respective Govt. to come up with the court's verdicts against the offenders.This is what they did with the GOI few days ago. Then why the same set of rules are not applied when they have to grant VISA to Narendra Modi or take action against a faculty member in a US based Univ? who decides what constitutes abuse and what is normal in public discourse? And if one exercises a standard to measure abuse (which in itself is impossible), why are they reluctant and hypocritical when asked to do the same for every issue and not selectively? It is a very curious aspect of human nature that people are quite hasty and even happy to assume the roles of critics and adjudicators...
Re: Double standards or even no standard at all
by Jena Bharati on Dec 11, 2011 12:33 AM
full of double standards, and rest is public relation mamangement. These two students speaking the same tenor and languge propgated by Fahi and cohorts for ages in american press. If fahi/isi can do it for 60 years, harvard cover may be an absolute shield. you can make your own judgement
He was not even asking moslems to convert. He is only expressing an opinion - that the right to suffrage be conditional upon individuals who acknowledge their Hindu legacy. How does that become hate speech? The muzlems of today did not jump out of the sky. It is so obvious to any honest student of history that over a period of 1000 years Hindus have been forcefully converted to Iz1am, which is still happening. Dr Swamy is only asking them acknowledge history.
The beauty of the whole issue is - when it was published Dr Swamy's article was not supported by many (including me). But as unjust criticism and abuse was heaped on him and DNA for such an article, ordinary people like me felt compelled to defend him, though we dont completely agree with his hardline stance on issues.
name reasoned discourse, then why not Dr Swamy asked to explain his opnion. Can Hravard stop Net Gingrich from teaching a course ?? obviously not , then why this bogotry against a hindu free thinker who is known for his doagrreing views on mamy. many occasions.
name reasoned discourse, then why not Dr Swamy asked to explain his opnion. Can Hravard stop Net Gingrich from teaching a course ?? obviously not , then why this bogotry against a hindu free thinker who is known for his doagrreing views on mamy. many occasions.
by right wing hindu groups that calls for condoning open incitement to violence, the right wing extremists of the US ought to be allowed to openly call for hunting down and persecuting all US residents of Indian origin !!!
If allowed, then such a call is sure to find an overwhelming affirmative response from middle class white Americans (who share the same stuxpid preferance for the apparent over the real as the Indian middle class does) !!
Re: By the same token of 'free speech' as advocated
by purva on Dec 10, 2011 09:22 PM
Umang Kumar and Sanjay Pinto hold a political view which supports the Congress Party and Sonia Gandhi. Dr. Swamy is a political detractor of the Gandhi family.
Therefore they wanted to shut Dr. Swamy's course. It is as simple as that.
Harvard should hear the other views and they did not.
Many people in India find the Congress Party views on multiple issues stifling (like the recent one by Sonia Gandhi as a leader of NAC, targeting the Hindus). Dr. Swamy was the only one in the whole spectrum of the Indian political community who challenged it.
You pay a price in India or the US educational institutions if you challenge Sonia Gandhi. Dr. Swamy has been asked to pay the price by the activism of these two students.
Re: Re: By the same token of 'free speech' as advocated
by Jena Bharati on Dec 10, 2011 09:49 PM
I totally agree, but by all accounts as the article reports, the faculty commitee uhled Dr Swamy's freedom of thought, and Dr Eck will come around it. But, I am aghast about these two students calling a spade, spade, and faculty committee should not have given any serious thought to it. Things for areason, and probably FDI nexus here. Wait it will come out.
Re: Re: By the same token of 'free speech' as advocated
by Jena Bharati on Dec 10, 2011 09:51 PM
I totally agree, but by all accounts as the article reports, the faculty commitee uhled Dr Swamy's freedom of thought, and Dr Eck will come around it. But, I am aghast about these two students calling a spade, spade, and faculty committee should not have given any serious thought to it. Things for areason, and probably FDI nexus here. Wait it will come out.
Re: Re: By the same token of 'free speech' as advocated
by Jena Bharati on Dec 10, 2011 09:56 PM
I totally agree. Congress is try everything in the closet to divert attention.
Re: Re: By the same token of 'free speech' as advocated
by Jena Bharati on Dec 10, 2011 09:57 PM
I totally agree. Congress is try everything in the closet to divert attention.
Re: Re: By the same token of 'free speech' as advocated
by nitmohan on Dec 11, 2011 08:43 AM
ts a complete failure of GENETIC MUTATION carried out at HARD-WARD on Subramanian Swamy. Just to show other mutated species the action was a deterring show for not accepting the YANKEE doctrine.
Re: By the same token of 'free speech' as advocated
by nitmohan on Dec 11, 2011 08:43 AM
Its a complete failure of GENETIC MUTATION carried out at HARD-WARD on Subramanian Swamy. Just to show other mutated species the action was a deterring show for not accepting the YANKEE doctrine. CHI DUMB ARAM is a example of the HARD WARD success
Umang Kumar and Sanjay Pinto are just advancing Congress Party views. These two students seem to be political activists for the Congress party and they want to silence Dr. Swamy because he has been critical of the Congress Party. They want to promote Congress party diktat as the only view that prevails everywhere about India. It just stifles other views totally. Harvard, as an education institution should hear diverse views and grievances.
Re: Political activism on behalf of Congress Party
by Jena Bharati on Dec 10, 2011 08:02 PM
who knows these pseudos, may be they are from porkland. I can not imagine they are so vile that they can not appreciate some one reminding the history of the land, the bharat.
