Obama administration did nothing for the nuclear bill (taking credit for the Bushs success is so mean), instead it tried every thing to scuttle Indias interest at China, at Pakistan and in Afghanistan. For Nuclear liability bill US will have to respect the the laws of another democratic country, or else it can leave it to other countries who are interested in doing business with in the existing laws.
Mr. Nicholas Burns. This is how it is gonna be, if suppliers are interested & capable of supplying under the framework, they may do it. No one is forcing them. We need to extra cautious after Bhopal incident.
they knows very well that give some millions dollors inpersonal capicity to some top key politicin and GET DONE WORK IN THEIR FAVOUR IN HASTE ( WILL PRESS IN LAST MOVEMENT TO RECTIFY BILL BY INDIAN PARLIAMENT IN THEIR FAOVOUR WITHOUT PUT SAFE GUARD FOR INDIAN). like a son get sign of his father on reprot card when he father in haste to go out to office.
USA needs jobs badly and Prez Obama is on defensive. India is generating huge business and employment for American economy. America Inc cannot get away with blackmailing INDIA as many nations are eager to SELL NUCLEAR REACTORS TO INDIA. PREZ OBAMA HAS NO CHOICE!
The Nuclear Liability Bill in brief: It basically sets a liability/accountability on the concerned persons/organisations in case of industrial/nuclear accidents. What the MNCs want is that they shud NOT be held accountable for any nuclear accidents due to the negligience of their Indian counterparts!!! So, as long as they mint money in India, its ok, but in case of accidents, they will not be liable, just like Union Carbide for Bhopal Disaster!!! This is NOT DONE !!
THE US-India nuclear bill should be immediately cancel as they serve only US multinatonal companies intrest only as they wanted earn billions & trillions of dollars on the dead bodies of innocent people who might suffer in case of accidents. Remember Bhopal tragedy how Anderson fly off scott free and until now he is having luxurious life in US and in our side people are still suffering miserably since 20 years. If something happen (God forbid) these US hypocrities fly off scott free again. AS we are good enough to take care of our energy needs and we should not make these deals on our poeple dead bodies. Hope politicians will ever learn the lesson from Bhopal gas targedy.
Re: Cancel the nuclear deal
by naif ahamed on Oct 21, 2010 12:14 PM
Isnt this exactly what the left parties said 2 years ago b4 pulling out support for the UPA?
The tone and tenor of Mr. Burn is typical of the so-called DEVELOPED world in matters related to the DEVELOPING world. There is no doubt in his stand, he stands for the well being of the PRIVATE SECTOR which is the backbone of the USA. We, India, will have to safeguard the safety and wellbeing of 1.2 billion Indians. The Nuclear Deal can wait. Mr Burn's views are timed to Obama's India visit, and are intended to bring pressure on Govt of India. India should not succumb to Burn's threats (caution). He says, he is retired, and if so, why can't he bother about things that are currently under his purview? Take rest, Mr. Burn. India knows how to handle its matters.
now the us does not have any leverage to make india pass the bill the way to its liking.indian laws will have to be respected otherwise they cn go sell their nke reactors to the porkis or wherever they want.what about dual use technology restrictions.it isnot to indias liking and they should amend that before preaching india.the us keeps on giving aid to the porkis knowing very well that they are behind the main masterminds for terrorism.rediff is a western stooge trying to show its western leanings and sychophancy towards the secularists whole time.
So the american think that millions of indian lives are cheaper than the american nuke companies going bankrupt? if they have to gain some pain needs to be taken...we already saw what US corp can do in bhopal..who looses if we have a stronger nuke liability certainly the US corp not indians..we have provided them the oppertunity it upto them to agree..do they compromise on their CISMO when transfering tecnology...NO...then why should we?
