Re: History cannot be varnished or whitewashed.
by Govindan on May 14, 2010 10:39 AM
Yes, 100%! Infact we should demand banning of the anti-national book!This traitor Salman Kurshid is also doling out largesse to the so-called minorities who once tormented us, at our own expense!What gross injustice it is to the Hindus!This can happen only in the banana democracy of present-day India!
Re: HAHAHAHAHA
by Mamoon Rasheed on May 14, 2010 12:03 PM
I do not understand how a bunch of people can come conquer and rule 98% of Hindu inhabitants ??? wat were the so called Hindu rulers or the masses doing then ?? wearing bangles and sitting at home ????
Re: Re: HAHAHAHAHA
by sujit kumar on May 14, 2010 03:47 PM
india was never fully ruled by the mughals or the muslim invaders. they ruled only a part of india. that is why even more than 800 years of so called muslim rule india still remained hindu in reality.that is why at the time of patition they could carve out pakistan out of 30% of united india. even in the 30% the sikh king mahraja ranjit singh was ruling. We salute to the HINDU spirit that resisted the invaders to preserve their religion & culture even under the barbaric rules of thecristains&themuslims
Re: This completely dustorted version of Indian history
by Govindan on May 14, 2010 10:50 AM
Muslims and marxists are ideologically similar-violent origin, so they support each other.both are liars, and have no conscience.so they understand only that language.Pseudo-secular scoundrels!dont provoke peaceful hindus to violence!Stop spreading lies about Hindus!
Hindus are spread hate violence, and Muslim are generous , INDIA was not united before Muslim and Xian invaders, these all comment are utter bullshit, those who have selective amnesia need to read history with open mind they will understand, what damage these Muslim and Xtian looter did to this wonderful country.
Re: Re: some cynical comment in below discussion
by Suman Bhat on May 14, 2010 01:22 AM
Mauryas were Oriyas, so their decisions dont count as those of normal Indians.
Re: Re: some cynical comment in below discussion
by mahesh vyas on May 14, 2010 10:15 AM
all cities today's india are build by Indians but renam and destroied by looter
Re: Re: Re: Re: some cynical comment in below discussion
by Govindan on May 14, 2010 10:54 AM
This chap defiling the name of Guruji golwalker must be a marxist scoundrel.
Re: Re: some cynical comment in below discussion
by Govindan on May 14, 2010 10:53 AM
ashok bajpai is an ignorant scum.if he does not have brains, how will he understand the truth?
Re: Mughals were far from secular
by ashok bajpai on May 14, 2010 01:07 AM
aim of mughal rulers was to see properous india &happy indians that is why in their cabinet people of all castes were there. conversion was not aim at all.otherwise even now lower castes are convering in large numbers.
Re: Mughals were far from secular
by Govindan on May 14, 2010 10:57 AM
You are right Sharmaji!The pseudo-secularists are worst traitors!We should start the elimination with them!
The GUPTA KINGS (Chandragupta, Samudragpta) were the best on the Indian Soil post AD. Rest are just ok. Its a lie to say that Mghal rulers were secular.
Re: Re: Even great GUPTA kings were much better than temple break
by Govindan on May 14, 2010 11:02 AM
You moron bajpai!read indian history- moghul period properly!No person in his right sense can say that Mohghuls were good.they were tyrants.the good among them were killed by the tyrants, like Dara Sukoh was killed by Aurangazeb, his own brother, who also beheaded his own son.It is a gory chapter!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Even great GUPTA kings were much better than temp
by Govindan on May 14, 2010 11:04 AM
You slimy creature! Rajput girls were taken as wives by force!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Even great GUPTA kings were much better than
by vinayak purohit on May 14, 2010 12:52 PM
not by force.h1ndus kill widows leave the elders to die in vrindavan,burn the teens if they dnt bring enough dowry. killing of woman is not s1n. in agra 50%of pros are from royal families of rajasthan. they were offering womens to get favours.
Re: All ARAB OIL wealth should be divided
by accounting master on May 13, 2010 09:08 PM
M in India next time you go for haj (financed by kafiir money) demand this from your arab brothers.
I am sure they will be kicked out of arabia and banned for ever
Re: Re: Re: Re: All ARAB OIL wealth should be divided
by Govindan on May 14, 2010 11:22 AM
it should actually be that way- that Haj subsidy and special facilities for every community should be generated from that community. Here it is all heaped on the heads of Hindus.And Ms are not even grateful for it!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: All ARAB OIL wealth should be divided
by vinayak purohit on May 14, 2010 12:56 PM
haj subsidy is neglible as compare to money spent on vedic festivals.more u people are polluting our river from centuring by throwing half burnt bodies in the rivers.specially gana. since vedics arrived in india,they are creating mess.which we non-vedics has to clean.
Re: Re: Re: Re: All ARAB OIL wealth should be divided
by vinayak purohit on May 14, 2010 12:59 PM
20 crores mzlms are paying taxes to goverment.moreover they are producers not consumers like u peopele.who pass their life in eating entertainment,sx&cheating.
Re: Re: Re: All ARAB OIL wealth should be divided
by Govindan on May 14, 2010 11:19 AM
You know pretty well that the Hindus donate money to their temples and temples are controlled by the 'secular' Govt which diverts that money for haj subsidy.Got it?
Re: Re: Re: All ARAB OIL wealth should be divided
by Suman Bhat on May 14, 2010 01:27 AM
You and your so-called brothers stink. Ever since 786, no non-Ms have gone to hell. Thats bcoz only Ms are thronging those dungeons. Forget 72 chix, all dead Ms are gays in hell.
Re: Re: Re: Re: All ARAB OIL wealth should be divided
by vinayak purohit on May 14, 2010 01:04 PM
now 72 are coming from vedic quota.as our are finished.
If Moghuls were really secularists, why did they rename importane and ancient cities? like Fatehpur Sikhri, Allahabad (for Kashi) many more.. Side kick...Moghuls can be seculars only in Playwrites...not Historically.. The faster we understand this, the better for the Nation...
Imtiaz Khan, do you know how many countries are in West Asia? Some of them are even smaller than our little Goa. Why all the muz1im countries in the Arrabian Gulf did not become one Country like India? Is that due to 1slam failing to unite them??
Why there are countries smaller than many Indian States in Europe despite majority of them following Xtianity? Why Xtianity failed to unite them??
