The problem in maoists infested areas is the ownership of the land which have minerals to exploit. The centre should frame its policy so that tribals are considered stake holders when the land is gisven to the industry for minerals exploitation. Alongwith it infrastructure development and scio- economic development sholuld also reach the remote areas.It is not only a socio- economic development issue.Besides it has degenerate in law and order problem as people with vested interests have expolioted these simple tribal people and that is how Dantewala incident can be explained. The state must show to the people that it governs and should separate these extremists for sstsersn action and take people along by agareeing to their genuine aspirations.
How is this moron even allowed to talk in public ? This dikhead will come to know if naxals massacre his near and dear in cold blood. Then will he talk about socia- economic problem like an intellectual ?
What happened in Dantewada is a symptom.You cant treat it as a disease.To use military and paramilitary force is to try and kill the symptom forcefully.The issues are social and economic.Grabbing lands from tribals for corporates and government is atrocious.It is Atrocity itself.And to use force is criminal.Why should only some sectors generate employment.Eg Military and paramilitary jobs.And Corporate jobs and govt jobs in Police.Look at the social fabric.Tribals do work genarate wealth.Military is only pomp and show of central powers.Dantewada requires social restructuring through involvement not exclusion.Trying to get the tribals to join mainstream is a very sophisticated excercise.The challenge is to do integration with equity.This is sensitive matter and demands sensibility.Individual heroes have no roles.It is not cricket.Department of Tribal welfare,Dept of Culture,Department of Forest,Environment,Minority Right Groups,NGOs,The Naxals all have a role to play.Tribal Internship ought to be introduced in universities around.Students from economics,law,sociology ect ought to go and do studies .Evolve a co-operative movement.Self government need to be evolved through Panchayats.Dantewada is not a battleground.We cant put one group against other calling it a law and order situation.Consensus building is an art.We cannot push our own people to the wall and then cry foul.There is no place for personalities.Larger issues ought to be discussed.
KK is starture less leader in AP politics. No need to give more waitage to his remarks. Normally all leaders and people of Telengana are the sympathisers of Naxals. Today most of the people leading the telengana movement are naxals and their sympathisers. Once a seperate Telengana is created it becomes hot bed for naxals, communal violence thus leading to the spread of terrorisam. Telengana being in the center of the country all the adjacent states will also have to take the pain.
Re: KK is starture less leader in AP politics
by reply on Apr 28, 2010 02:56 PM
SunilDupakuntla has stature in AP politics. All should listen to him. He knows jatakas of politicians and he knows future also, great. So Mr. great personality (Sunil) can u suggest what has to be done to solve these issues like Naxalism, Telangana separation. I hope whatever proposal u have will address the root causes of the issues.
