Re: Speedy recovery for PM
by Indian Indian on Jan 21, 2009 11:07 PM
What is Right about that Man, He is decieving you and me, he's deceiving the country, I haven't see a person with such low self esteem, what's right about that man ????
IT IS ALL FOR YOUNG LEADER GUYS!RAUL KHAN! DON'T U UNDERSTAND?
AND HERE PANKAJ AND MANY OTHERS WHO R TALKING FOR YOUNG LEADER , INDIRECTLY THEY R CAMPAIGNING FOR CONGEE FOR REMOVING BUDDHA! IT'S RAJTANTRA GUYS! CONGEE IS FOOLING THE PUBLIC!
The same thing will happen with Advani and with Modi 25 years later when he becomes PM. This system is faulty and the country is paying for it. First it was Vajpayee with knee problems and now it is MMS. How can they make tough decisions? America was going that route but was lucky to escape. The system made it possible and the citizens willfully selected a vibrant, young leader in Obama.
Re: Too old to lead.
by Indian Indian on Jan 21, 2009 10:54 PM
A PM is not supposed to run a 100m race. In India his main purpose is to keep his folks together and let the Cabinet work for their respective depts. If you are sick you would want to see a 70 year old doctor, not a 30 year old newbee, running a country is not a child's play. Vajpayee with Knee problem ran the country than any PM did. all these highways/ Airport upgradation new IITS etc, Railways/Metro that you see today were concieved during his regime...
Re: Re: Too old to lead.
by Chetan Dutta on Jan 21, 2009 11:18 PM
Airport upgradation has been started by UPA. Dont misled people. Metro rail is Delhi govt. project. From where ABA has come into picture? ABA in later stages became so forget ful that he used to forget the topic in the long pauses between his dialogues. Everyone in the PMO knew that Brajesh Mishra is runing the govt. How many days ABA attended office? MMS works even on Sundays. There are official log book entries to prove what I am saying. sentences
Re: Re: Re: Too old to lead.
by Indian Indian on Jan 21, 2009 11:35 PM
Nothing is lies. Go google it... here's a cutting from 2003. I wasn't talking about Delhi Metro, Sheila Dixit is certainly doing a good job
From: Airports International | Date: April 1, 2003 | COPYRIGHT 2003 Thomas Telford Ltd. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information) Copyright information
According to Indian Aviation Minister Shanawaz Hussain, a US$ 419.2 million project has been approved for a terminal at New Delhi Airport. The new terminal will be three times the size of the present building and will include extensive business and recreational facilities. According to Finance Ministry sources, a US$ 735 million ...
I have asked this 100 times on this forum but never got an answer, people who says BJP escorted Terrorists to Kandhar, I want to ask these people if you were PM then what would you have done to save your 200 citizens.
Re: I have asked this 100 times on this forum but never got an an
by jeet choudhury on Jan 21, 2009 10:41 PM
Excellent question, given the topic. No wonder you did not get an answer. Have you ever paused to think that maybe you don't deserve ananswer given the irrelevance of the question to the discussion.
Re: Re: I have asked this 100 times on this forum but never got a
by decent simple on Jan 21, 2009 11:20 PM
but u think this as irrelevance of the question
Re: Re: I have asked this 100 times on this forum but never got a
by Indian Indian on Jan 21, 2009 10:58 PM
Obviosly a forum cannot run of Manmohan Singh's health, because to tell you the truth 99.99% Indians don't care for what he does and where he is, so discussion has to be out of topic..
Re: Re: Re: I have asked this 100 times on this forum but never g
by Chetan Dutta on Jan 21, 2009 11:22 PM
Ur 99.99% Indians made him the PM of the country. Or do u think that all those who voted UPA to power are not Indians? or may be India wanted Sonia Gandhi to be PM? Whatever lies u may say - it is a historical fact now that Congress led by Sonia Gandhi defeated BJP led by Atal Vajpayee. And the history will repeat itself now that BJP is much weaker with no Atal there and its stalwart Kalyan Singh resigning. Time will prove that even Rajnath Singh will not be able to win from Ghaziabad.
Re: I have asked this 100 times on this forum but never got an an
by Krishna reddy on Jan 21, 2009 10:41 PM
India has 1 billion people if 200 die it won't make any difference, so it is a waste of travel to Kandhakar
Re: Re: I have asked this 100 times on this forum but never got a
by Indian Indian on Jan 21, 2009 10:45 PM
That's a nice answer, never thought about it. Captain Unnikrishnan & 15 other soldiers were fools, they laid their lives saving 200-300 Indians in Taj, they should have just blown up the building killing everybody including Terrorists... how would it matter if out of 1.2 billion people another 200-300 had died..
Re: Re: Re: Re: I have asked this 100 times on this forum but nev
by Manoj Sharma on Jan 21, 2009 11:39 PM
fascist mindset speaking. if someone does not agree with u, start by calling him names, then attack him.
Re: Re: I have asked this 100 times on this forum but never got a
by Indian Indian on Jan 21, 2009 10:59 PM
Also regarding your question on Ram Temple, It wasn't the BJP govt. It was NDA govt. and NDA had it's own Menifesto, and Ram Temple wasn't a part of it...
Re: Re: I have asked this 100 times on this forum but never got a
by Indian Indian on Jan 21, 2009 10:49 PM
Okay, so you still don't have an answer to my question on Kandhar. Now for your questions, The Attacks during NDA regime were not happening like they are happening now, they brought the Law POTA, also in response to parliament attack, operation Parakram was done, it was the biggest military excercise in the history of India(not war). If you have anybody in army, ask him what were the benefits of operation Parakram, I hope you won't ask this question then. I'm telling you againg you are a naive person, your knowledge is hollow and words don't have substance
Re: Re: Re: I have asked this 100 times on this forum but never g
by Neutral on Jan 21, 2009 10:59 PM
@indian indian: i am giving u the ultimate answer for "people who says BJP escorted Terrorists to Kandhar, I want to ask these people if you were PM then what would you have done to save your 200 citizens?" - answer is the reply question: is congee sacrificing a single saravjit to hang a single trerrorist, and they r questioning for sacrificing 200 indian for 1 trerrorist? -though congee is doing just drama and no suitable answer was given like above till date, so congee and other all playing with it but to-day, i, neutral, has given the answer on behalf of bjp and a arms for their election campaigning!
Re: Re: Re: Re: I have asked this 100 times on this forum but nev
by Neutral on Jan 21, 2009 11:07 PM
everytime our defence, external ministry have been habituated to tell that"how we can hang afjal or any trerrorist as sarabjit is in their hand!"
Re: Re: Re: I have asked this 100 times on this forum but never g
by francisco almeida on Jan 21, 2009 11:01 PM
All NDA did was ignite nuclear divice. They are terrorist and have no love for humans.
Re: Re: Re: Re: I have asked this 100 times on this forum but nev
by Indian Indian on Jan 21, 2009 11:05 PM
Almeida, Do some reading, even congress media find it difficult to negate all the work done between 2000-2005. Have you seen Lalu's Ad. They'll show you growth figure of 1999, than 2006, 2007, 2008. He gulps 2002, 3003, 2004. because that's where things started transforming, don't waste your life on lies..
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I have asked this 100 times on this forum but
by Chetan Dutta on Jan 21, 2009 11:14 PM
I will give u a reply. By asking this question, u r contradicting ur own false propaganda against UPA for being secular. You have negated the very thoery of a Strong State. This argument that Masood Azhar was released to save 200 passengers proves that NDA was no better (or worse) than UPA in tackling terror. It bowed down as easily to terrorists as did Janta Dal govt. in 1990 (Rubaina Sayeed. Do u know the policy of Israel - no exchange of hostage under any circumstances. The NDA govt. proved what the world always knew - jo garajte hain, wo baraste nahin
Re: Re: Re: Re: I have asked this 100 times on this forum but nev
by Neutral on Jan 21, 2009 11:04 PM
because of this deterent, u r still alive in our country !
Re: Re: Re: I have asked this 100 times on this forum but never g
by Chetan Dutta on Jan 21, 2009 11:30 PM
will give u a reply. By asking this question, u r contradicting ur own false propaganda against UPA for being secular. You have negated the very thoery of a Strong State. This argument that Masood Azhar was released to save 200 passengers proves that NDA was no better (or worse) than UPA in tackling terror. It bowed down as easily to terrorists as did Janta Dal govt. in 1990 (Rubaina Sayeed. Do u know the policy of Israel - no exchange of hostage under any circumstances. The NDA govt. proved what the world always knew - jo garajte hain, wo baraste nahin Do u have any knowledge about army operations? Obviously No. Operation Prakaram was the biggest drain on exchequer ever with no results. Entire army was mobilised taking months but not even a single rubber bullet was fired. It was done to build a war hysteria in the country so that people dont ask the govt. what is ur response to the Parliament attack? ulimately everything fizzled out. Now people like u r asking what govt. is doing over Mumbai. Why it is not attacking pak? Why didnt ur NDA attack pak? The answer is simple - India has only a slight edge over pakistan in army strength bcoz India has to defend borders against China, Burma, Bangladesh, Nepal AND Pakistan. Whereas pakistan has only India to attack. And wars are not won on the basis of a slight edge. Besides in a war Pakistan has nothing to lose - their country has already collapsed and is being run on US and Chinese support whereas damage for India will b great
Re: Re: Re: I have asked this 100 times on this forum but never g
by Manoj Sharma on Jan 21, 2009 11:36 PM
sure i do hv an answer for ur kandahar question. that is - when handling such a big country and such an important matter, there r several things u need to consider. saving lives of citizens is important. but what also needs to be considered is the future repurcussions any action might cause. the situation is not the same as taj attack bcoz in taj foreign citizens were holed up. so u need to consider the impact of relations with those countries if u decide to blow up the bldg. so in kandahar case, the best soln would hv been to carry out an israel-type commando operation to rescue the trapped passengers. it would hv risked the passengers lives but sent out a strong msg.
