Discussion Board

US House passes resolution on Mahatma


Total 176 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
suryanarayan bhaskar
Make it clear!!!
by suryanarayan bhaskar on Feb 12, 2009 09:51 AM  | Hide replies

It should be made very clear to the world that Mohandas karamchand Gandhi was in no way related to the Nehru-Gandhi family. The family ie the biggest curse on India has been misusing the name Gandhi for their own benefit and to fool the world.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
KTvREDDY
Re: Make it clear!!!
by KTvREDDY on Feb 12, 2009 09:53 AM
other extreme,Known Gy Lawyer Mr KVatil from Satara known to have issued a warrant asking Gnadhiji to appear at court for commiting violence on Kasturba!!

Same fellow extracted 10 milion from VS Naipaul as a settelemnt for withdrwing Domestic Case on Naipaul as he cofessed he abused his ex!!

Seems like KVatil should be investigated by IT People fast before he transfer funds to UK by hawala!


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Ashwin Ramaswamy
Re: TALIBAN MODI AND ADVANI BIN LADEN!!!
by Ashwin Ramaswamy on Feb 12, 2009 06:51 AM
Becoz of Modi only Gujarat is peaceful and prosperous..roads are excellent, business is blooming..and communal harmony exists among the people..Modi was never really responsible for Gujarat riots..train was burned probably on tip from Congress

   Forward   |   Report abuse
mark twain
Re: Re: TALIBAN MODI AND ADVANI BIN LADEN!!!
by mark twain on Feb 12, 2009 07:05 AM
We are supposed to be discussing Gandhi's greatness and not Modi's achievments.lol

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Godwin Blue
Chandra babu Naidu, Manmohan, Chidambaram, Rahul is best team
by Godwin Blue on Feb 12, 2009 06:24 AM  | Hide replies

To be honest, out of oldies, Congress is much better, whether it is Gandhi or non Gandhi within Congress. Look at other parties Vajpayee (90 years), Advani (80 years) good for nothing except he is respected by few for his age and for his contribution towards BJPs communal riots.

CPM/ CPI - hopeless, we need them if we want to go back to 18th century.

Narendra Modi - We better bring Taliban , this guy is even worse.

I don't see any hope other than congress.

In Andhra, we had one smart politician (Chandra babu Naidu - the IT guy), he is probably an educated and capable PM, other than congress team (Manmohan Singh, Chidambaram, Rahul).

To be honest Congress is one of the best team, best head we have at the moment

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Hari Pal
Re: Chandra babu Naidu, Manmohan, Chidambaram, Rahul is best team
by Hari Pal on Feb 12, 2009 08:12 AM
Nehru and Gandhi dynasty took India back 50 years. Manmohan Singh worked better as a finance minister under N. Rao than as our Prime Minister and had a big hand with India's present day global status. All the older Congressmen have very little of education, intelligence and initiatives and are in high positions by being "yes men". It is difficult to get a natural leader like Obama untilthise old haggards get out from politics.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
mahesh vyas
Re: Chandra babu Naidu, Manmohan, Chidambaram, Rahul is best team
by mahesh vyas on Feb 12, 2009 09:11 AM
In my next massage u will find fact about rahul gandi

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bhindranwale
Re: Chandra babu Naidu, Manmohan, Chidambaram, Rahul is best team
by Bhindranwale on Feb 12, 2009 06:28 AM
RAHUL IS AN IDIOT!!! LEAVE HIM ALONE!!! WE HAVE 1000S OF BETTER PEOPLE IN INDIA

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sumeet
Re: Re: Chandra babu Naidu, Manmohan, Chidambaram, Rahul is best
by sumeet on Feb 12, 2009 10:19 AM
who are you a super idiot? Dude first do something for the country then think of saying others idiot.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Godwin Blue
Re: Re: Chandra babu Naidu, Manmohan, Chidambaram, Rahul is best
by Godwin Blue on Feb 12, 2009 06:32 AM
Oh yeah we have 1000s of better people. I agree but only few can come to power.

To come to power you need to be either rowdy or son of big politician.

He is probably not as smart as many, but he is young generation. I haven't seen, Rahul play cheap politics.

You don't have to be super genious to fly to rocket. You need to have determination, and hard work , this will take you anywhere you want. I think Rahul has that, he will better than many useless idiots in today's politics

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
rohan agrawal
Re: Re: Chandra babu Naidu, Manmohan, Chidambaram, Rahul is best
by rohan agrawal on Feb 12, 2009 08:10 AM
MMS: still waiting for orders...
Rahul: 100% record of letting congress down wherever he did road-shows
PC: Already f*cked Indian economy now busy in is home :-)
CB Naidu: Biggest competitor of Congess in AP so no idea how can you team him with congress.

Modi bring growth in Gujrat, did any Congress CM can compete him?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sumeet
Re: Re: Re: Chandra babu Naidu, Manmohan, Chidambaram, Rahul is b
by sumeet on Feb 12, 2009 10:23 AM
Modi also brought godhra to gujrat.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Good Fellas
Re: Re: Re: Re: Chandra babu Naidu, Manmohan, Chidambaram, Rahul
by Good Fellas on Feb 12, 2009 03:22 PM
Modi responded to Godhra incident.........i hope this is not difficult to understand for any from a pseudosecular or a minorty community.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
suryanarayan bhaskar
Re: Chandra babu Naidu, Manmohan, Chidambaram, Rahul is best team
by suryanarayan bhaskar on Feb 12, 2009 09:53 AM
Congess is a party that does not have any democracy. It is a party of bootlickers and slaves of the Nehru family.Congress has shown that it can stoop to any level to get their minority votes.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
mahesh vyas
Re: Chandra babu Naidu, Manmohan, Chidambaram, Rahul is best team
by mahesh vyas on Feb 12, 2009 09:14 AM
Rahul Gandhi attended Modern School, New Delhi[4] before entering the The Doon School. The Doon School had been his father's alma mater. [5] Rahul Gandhi attended Doon from 1981-83 before being home-schooled for security reasons.[6] His admission to St Stephen's College was controversial as he was admitted on the basis of his abilities as a competitive pistol shooter, which was disputed.[6] He left the school in 1990, after one year of education.[4]

It is reported that Harvard alumni records list him as attending between 1990 and 1993 but not as completing a degree.[7]. He transferred, reportedly due to security concerns following his father's assassination, to Rollins College in Florida where he completed a B.A. in 1994[8]. During the parliamentary elections in 2004, Gandhi claimed that he had received an MPhil in Development Economics after attending Trinity College, Cambridge. Media enquiries report that he attended under the alias "Raul Vinci".

He worked in London with the strategy consultancy firm Monitor Group [9], before returning to India in late 2002 to run an engineering and technology outsourcing firm in Mumbai

   Forward   |   Report abuse
angryman
Re: Chandra babu Naidu, Manmohan, Chidambaram, Rahul is best team
by angryman on Feb 12, 2009 08:44 AM
I know where you are comming from. you are another illiterate who thinks congress is doing good for you.

Good for you. i dont think thats correct but then whats the fun if everyone is on one team

   Forward   |   Report abuse
jack back
Neruvians gave bad name to Gandhi...
by jack back on Feb 12, 2009 04:41 AM  | Hide replies

Gandhi had said to dissolve congress party once India becomes free, but Neru did not do it. His son-in-law adopted fake last name as Gandhi & till todate the family & their supporters doing everything that Mahatma opposed; and at the same time opposed everything what Mahtama stood for...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
TIGER MAN
Re: Neruvians gave bad name to Gandhi...
by TIGER MAN on Feb 12, 2009 05:08 AM
CONGRES SHOULD NEVER BERING THIS ...GandhiS ..NAME ..JUST FOR CONVIENCE...BECAUSE GANDIS MAIN POLICY WAS ..SWADESHI.....AND EVERYONE KNOWS HOW SWEDSHI CONGRESS HAS BEEN...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
saadhvi narayanan
Re: Neruvians gave bad name to Gandhi...
by saadhvi narayanan on Feb 12, 2009 05:04 AM
hmm YES. Politicians use others information for free. Gandhi should have patterned his thoughts and his name too. No more Mahatma Gandhi follows. It is very difficult to follow.
I am not sure why USA is talking about this. They should have removed theie soldies in Iraq I am not sure for what reason they want to keep it there.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
jack back
Re: Re: Neruvians gave bad name to Gandhi...
by jack back on Feb 12, 2009 05:14 AM
You really need to look little further & deeper to understand how Gandhi's name was used & abused by these Congis just for their personal gains. Today because of internet you have access to much more information but it was not so during 50's thru 80's when Congis really accumulated their wealth illegally & now using the same to stay in power to loot more.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
mark twain
Re: Re: Re: Neruvians gave bad name to Gandhi...
by mark twain on Feb 12, 2009 06:47 AM
Congies only abused gandhi's name.They did not abuse his body and kill him like some so called patriots.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bhindranwale
Re: Neruvians gave bad name to Gandhi...
by Bhindranwale on Feb 12, 2009 06:25 AM
MAHATMA KILLERS TRYING TO COME BACK TO POWER TO KILL MORE INDIANS AND MULEST INDIAN WOMEN (RAVAN SENA)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
antoniomaino
Re: Re: Neruvians gave bad name to Gandhi...
by antoniomaino on Feb 12, 2009 11:39 PM
must be a convert, in Bhinder name

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Soul First
Re: Neruvians gave bad name to Gandhi...
by Soul First on Feb 12, 2009 05:51 AM
We need professionals to run the country and not the sychophants and oldies from Grand Old Corrupt Party (GOCP) also called INC (Indian National Corrupt) party.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Godwin Blue
Re: Re: Neruvians gave bad name to Gandhi...
by Godwin Blue on Feb 12, 2009 06:22 AM
To be honest, out of oldies, Congress is much better, whether it is Gandhi or non Gandhi within Congress. Look at other parties Vajpayee (90 years), Advani (80 years) good for nothing except he is respected by few for his age and for his contribution towards BJPs communal riots.

CPM/ CPI - hopeless, we need them if we want to go back to 18th century.

Narendra Modi - We better bring Taliban , this guy is even worse.

I don't see any hope other than congress.

In Andhra, we had one smart politician (Chandra babu Naidu - the IT guy), he is probably an educated and capable PM, other than congress team (Manmohan Singh, Chidambaram, Rahul).

To be honest Congress is one of the best team, best head we have at the moment.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
krishna dayalan
Re: Re: Re: Neruvians gave bad name to Gandhi...
by krishna dayalan on Feb 12, 2009 07:16 AM
CANDRABABU NAIDU IS THE BEST GUY FOR PM IN 2009


   Forward   |   Report abuse
jet
No invader divided india but Gandhi did
by jet on Feb 12, 2009 04:32 AM  | Hide replies

India was attacked by many barbaric invaders, they killed our people and looted it and went away, No body was able to divide this country till 1947. There may be 100s of kingdoms but still that land after Hindukush was called HINDUstan, but Gandhi allowed HIndustan to be partitioned in to pakistan and India, Look what we are getting from that pakistan, 60 years of proxy war and killing of thousands of indian, The same pakistan to which Gandhi insisted on giving 100 of crores of aid from a poor bleeding India. India would have been a different country if Patel or even Jinna became Prime minister, but Nehru screwed our country and his family is still screwing..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
saadhvi narayanan
Re: Re: No invader divided india but Gandhi did
by saadhvi narayanan on Feb 12, 2009 05:06 AM
Everything we can say now. How old are you? Will you go for fight if there is a war in India by leaving your families. Atleast Mahamta did it. He was not having Coffee he was fighting for us to live in India. Think one thing can you able to speak about rights against our Politicians now.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
LK Advani
Re: Re: No invader divided india but Gandhi did
by LK Advani on Feb 12, 2009 05:03 AM
perhaps you are another chaddiwala who is trying to change history, buddy hisotyr cannot be changed according to your wishes chaddiwale, am sending you a pink chaddi, dont worry

   Forward   |   Report abuse
janmejay tanwar
Re: No invader divided india but Gandhi did
by janmejay tanwar on Feb 12, 2009 05:19 AM
Hindustan or BharatVarsha or whatever name you give to Indian Subcontinent was not a peaceful place, never has been, there were so many constant wars between the states. From the Mahabharata to Alexander to Invasions from west to Britishers, you can find many instances of atrocities and wars between states. The last millennium is dominated by Muslim invasions from West, the millennium before that is full of wars between Shaivs and Vaishnavs and the millennium before that is full of wars between Buddhism and Puranic culture(mostly present day Hinduism) and the millenium before that was full of aryan and tribal invasions from north west.
Blaming Gandhi for everything is a national pastime in India, i am not going to comment on the politics but at an individual level he definitely was more than a normal human. Someone has to have extraordinary courage to stand to injustice and power and to leave a prosperous life and return to serve the people. People like you can just talk, what have you done till now to help your people ?? I can only laugh at your ignorance. And i can also bet that you don't even understand Gandhi and non-violence, So when lawmakers of a foreign state / country stand up and pay homage to Gandhi then you have to understand that it must be a beautiful legacy so please stop ruining it. Before criticizing Gandhi atleast read his books once.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
vinay thakur
Re: No invader divided india but Gandhi did
by vinay thakur on Feb 12, 2009 05:56 AM
I strongly recommend you to read ''Freedom at midnight''.It has become fashionable to critisize Gandhi.You merely know history.Gandhi was strongly against formation of Pakistan and he was sidelined by Neharu-Mountbatton during these discussions!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
A KB
Re: No invader divided india but Gandhi did
by A KB on Feb 12, 2009 05:22 AM
oops...wotz this? Somebody forgot that the Brits were in india for 2 centuries. Full of fury, little facts in your writing, jet!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
mark twain
Re: No invader divided india but Gandhi did
by mark twain on Feb 12, 2009 06:54 AM
THe white man and the black man travel thousands of miles to our country to pay homage to a great mahatma but what do our so called patriots do? Trash his name and humilate him even after his death. When he was alive they did not let him live in peace ,after death let them atleast let his soul"RIP"!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
A KB
Re: Re: No invader divided india but Gandhi did
by A KB on Feb 12, 2009 07:23 AM
Apparently, the brown man is the last to recognize gandhi! It's idiots and ignorance that are the scourge of this great nation and the earth. If indians have any value, it's the value of good sense, common sense, love, simplicity and steadfastness. Don't trash the ancient values just because they are ancient! Values never grow old! Even the west has started to notice!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 176 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
Write a message