Mulayam and Laloooo gave clean chit to SIMI. When Ahmedabad police arrested SIMI chief in UP, Mulayam paraded at simi office and muslim area and pressured center to release the arrested SIMI Chief, later he was released by center pressure upon gujrat police. AP Minister and MLA Shabbier ali is involved in supporting terrorists and intelligence reported to center that he was indirectly involved in HYD bomblasts. BUT center did not take any action against congress minister since he gets lots of minority votes.
Re: Minority Appeasement
by siddharth on Oct 03, 2008 02:11 AM
The SIMI chief in UP again arrested after the Delhi bomb blast and he was found guilty in terrorist activity, They arrested this time because the pressure was immense after the Delhi blast all the opposition and Delhi local people criticized the govt and also main reason was election is around the corner in delhi
Re: Minority Appeasement
by Ratnesh Sahay on Oct 03, 2008 03:36 AM
This means for practical purposes SIMI and the present govt. are working hand in hand.
Re: wasn't Mohamad Smart ?
by Abd on Oct 03, 2008 02:09 AM
85% of Muslims in India were SC, Backward Hindus: Report Hyderabad: "Forefathers of a majority of Muslims in the country were scheduled castes and backward Hindus who embraced Islam over a period of time", according to a report. These people embraced Islam at different points of time, "whenever the opportunity came to escape from class structure," the report on 'Identification of Socially and Educationally Classes in Muslim community of Andhra Pradesh' said. The report prepared by Advisor to Ministry of HRD, P. S Krishnan, for the Andhra Pradesh Government, presents a complete picture of Muslims and their socio-economic conditions in the country. "The conversion of Hindus to Islam happened over a period of time, especially in the medieval period. The people who embraced Islam were not happy with Hinduism which has a rigid system," he said. Krishnan said the caste system in Hinduism is very rigid and puts each community at certain place in the hierarchy. And it does not allow communities to go up. "This system made many people to escape from it when opportunity arose. Across the country, people considered as untouchables and other castes, which faced discriminations, became Muslims. In fact Islam came as a big relief for them," Krishnan said.
Re: @ Indian's 30% myth
by Abd on Oct 03, 2008 02:11 AM
85% of Muslims in India were SC, Backward Hindus: Report Hyderabad: "Forefathers of a majority of Muslims in the country were scheduled castes and backward Hindus who embraced Islam over a period of time", according to a report. These people embraced Islam at different points of time, "whenever the opportunity came to escape from class structure," the report on 'Identification of Socially and Educationally Classes in Muslim community of Andhra Pradesh' said. The report prepared by Advisor to Ministry of HRD, P. S Krishnan, for the Andhra Pradesh Government, presents a complete picture of Muslims and their socio-economic conditions in the country. "The conversion of Hindus to Islam happened over a period of time, especially in the medieval period. The people who embraced Islam were not happy with Hinduism which has a rigid system," he said. Krishnan said the caste system in Hinduism is very rigid and puts each community at certain place in the hierarchy. And it does not allow communities to go up. "This system made many people to escape from it when opportunity arose. Across the country, people considered as untouchables and other castes, which faced discriminations, became Muslims. In fact Islam came as a big relief for them," Krishnan said.
Re: @ Indian's 30% myth
by Indian on Oct 03, 2008 02:26 AM
Dear sir Its Muslims who are waving these flags...u r right, its Sad but true..and that is not happening in kashmir and hyderabad only. It is also happening in KURLA, Byculla Masjid Bandar (all parts of mumbai which r muslim dominated) As true as those muslims who used to wave pakistani flags in UK whenever pakistan used to win a cricket match there. Yes those muslim use too earlier....But now...they dont. With anti terror law in place in UK any one uses that 'JIHAD' word is sent behind bars....anyone even remotely supporting yr so called J activities lands in prison for 45 days. What is the result in UK? Much wanted peace. Non muslims now can breeeaaath ... I wish such a law soon comes up india....HOW we wish Pota is restored.. But we have hopes, today most of the major states r ruled by BJP and soon they will be comming to power at the center....very soon, very very soon
Re: Re: @ Indian's 30% myth
by Gugga on Oct 03, 2008 10:00 AM
it shows ur mistreatment of muslims so that they dont fly the flags of region where they live. terror law on flying pakistan flags? lol are u kiddin me?
Re: @ Indian's 30% myth
by siddharth on Oct 03, 2008 01:54 AM
Where did you read about babri masjid in history book, It was Ram temple before babar attacked, havent you read about it in history books.
Re: @ Indian's 30% myth
by Gugga on Oct 03, 2008 09:57 AM
so ater 300-400 u realised just before the elections? Advani in the city and igniting the rioters? was he sleeping in 1980? 1970? then he goes to pak and praises Jinnah? i mean what is he!Babri was made by Babar on Ram temple and Taj mahal was a temple too! Kaaba in Mecca has a shiva linga on it,but Akbar never changed it or hindus never protested with him he was a good guy?they didnt ask this to brits,nehru or atleast Patel lol he can do police action after junagadh goes to pakistan and then hold plebescite just coz he knew its 95% hindu but when pak did the same in kashmir u started cryin like babies? and no plebescite which Nehru promised? coz u knew ull loose? so y put it on religion just say we grab it,no one answered my questions where r muslims of ferozpur? 2000 sikhs and 2000 muslims vanished? if nizams, nawabs accessions are final then hyderabad and junagadh is pakistan part if apply the kashmir accession code of hari singh? prove me wrong!
Re: @ Indian's 30% myth
by Jas Sand on Oct 03, 2008 01:57 AM
There is no history in his land of terrorism before 1947. Dont blame him for that - Stupidity is in their jeans and blood
Re: Mohamad was Very Smart and ...
by Big Moe on Oct 03, 2008 12:57 AM
It is so amazing that anybody can start a website claiming that their story is the true one. And then you have another set of people following these websites and even refer them to put forward their points of view.
Re: Re: Mohamad was Very Smart and ...
by trustworthy delhite on Oct 03, 2008 01:44 AM
baap re baap, itna gyan? let me give you somemore gyan on this.
Do you know Michael Hart published a book on 100 most influential peosons in history? and guess what -who's on top - Muhammad. and mr. fake almighty it does not have ur name nor your Ram or laxman name.
but best of lucks - keep researching on Islam, one day either you or one of ur descendents will convert and this is going to happen.
Re: Mohamad was Very Smart and ...
by Abd on Oct 03, 2008 12:59 AM
when i want went for prayers today for EID,the Mullah gave a hard hitting sermon about how we have to get the terrorsits arrested and we need to show our good attitude so that people understand what Islam is I came a changed man but after reading the blog I feel its no use explaining to these di-ck worshipping morons,Quran says not to make fun of other gods i feel we need to make fun of other deities forgive me god if iam a transgressor for making fun of other gods,communication is a imp tool to deal with these Sanghi Morons,with no offence to secular hindu brethern
Re: Re: Mohamad was Very Smart and ...
by aproudmuslim on Oct 03, 2008 01:35 AM
Abd, you should refrain. Some of the comments here are plain offensive and mean, but that does not mean you have to stoop to their levels. Unfortunately tehre are too many hate-Islam websites with too much of mis information (the fact that Aiesha was between 6 & 9 at the age of marriage is one such lie) and people read it and want to believe it and repeat it too. Just ignore them and behave like a good muslim. They will learn in time, Inshallah.
Re: What is Jihad: The Arabic word Jihad is derived from the root word Jahada (struggle).
by Abd on Oct 03, 2008 12:38 AM
when i want went for prayers today for EID,the Mullah gave a hard hitting sermon about how we have to get the terrorsits arrested and we need to show our good attitude so that people understand what Islam is I came a changed man but after reading the blog I feel its no use explaining to these di-ck worshipping morons,Quran says not to make fun of other gods i feel we need to make fun of other deities forgive me god if iam a transgressor for making fun of other gods,communication is a imp tool to deal with these Sanghi Morons,with no offence to secular hindu brethern
To hell with the Taliban. First of all they are not in India and secondly thank god the US / NATO armies are dealing with them. If this were left to the corrupt indian government nothing would happen unless a VIP was affected. Secondly the UP / Bihar / Jharkhand Bhaiji's along with their corrupt politico's and their delhi punjabi patrons are more dangerous IMHO. Deal with these freaks first and then worry about the talib dolts..
Re: Raman is way off mark....
by Gugga on Oct 03, 2008 01:13 AM
he is just here to boil some indian blood and to be communal! he has no insight writes on topics beyond his imagination to get some money! he knows all about it but the secret meeting was "held somewhere in south waziristan" lol Classic example of "by way of deception"
Re: Is there a thing called Education in Pakistan?
by Indian on Oct 03, 2008 12:10 AM
Yeah Right...U r absolutely right. Knowing English does not mean that one is educated. There r many educated in India who dont speak english well. But to gain more "proper" knowledge reading in english does helps. Atleast Laloo was not "educated" in a Madrasa. And yr Cricketers represent your country (Ambassador) Apart from few like Imran Khan, No one else has been able to speak decent english. It only reflects their background And I guess u must be pakistani or a Muslim living in India.
Re: Re: Is there a thing called Education in Pakistan?
by Abd on Oct 03, 2008 12:49 AM
Hey Mr Indian,whts your credentials you shit piece of a moron,what do you mean by Indian muslim not speaking english,Just visit any call center and see for urself,the muslims who are educated,how they speak english with out any MTI,they speak like native speakers i invite you to a debate with me,Trust me I will win Hands down,
Re: While all forms of religious fanaticism are negative, only Islam raises slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims) to a holy creed
by Yaqoot Mir on Oct 02, 2008 11:41 PM
Purely in terms of numbers killed in the name of religion, Chirstianity has been the most voilent religion and still is. Media reports against islam are simply unjustified.
Re: While all forms of religious fanaticism are negative, only Islam raises slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims) to a holy creed
by vignesh on Oct 02, 2008 11:56 PM
SIMI and Indian Mujahideen in India , Taliban in Pakistan and Afghanistan , Al Qaeda globally . What is the common link to all this ? Use your brains not your balls ..all these are Islamic terrorist organizations . How many christian and hindu terrorist organizations can you name in the currernt world ?
Re: While all forms of religious fanaticism are negative, only Islam raises slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims) to a holy creed
by Indian on Oct 03, 2008 12:33 AM
You have read in a book?, Book written by ??? ...everyones guess is same as mine. But do u know some facts. Stan chart and many such banks refuse to issue credit card to muslims and people in muslims dominated areas such as mahim in mumbai. Even Pooja bedi (married to a Muslim) was asked to change her surname (furniturewala) on the form by a credit card representative as it would have helped her in getting the credit card issued. THESE ARE FACTS reported in Times of India and yes...protested by muslim. Choro ko sare nazar aate hain chor
Re: While all forms of religious fanaticism are negative, only Islam raises slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims) to a holy creed
by Anshul on Oct 03, 2008 12:31 AM
no it is not correct....your ancestors were not thives?
Re: Re: While all forms of religious fanaticism are negative, only Islam raises slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims) to a holy creed
by Abd on Oct 03, 2008 01:18 AM
Bhatkar Ahamed,
Dont paint all the people with the same brush,Remember you will have to answer Allah,for giving false information,Lets not wash Urine with Urine,but with water,whtever these morons might say ,The truth is Islam is Great,but the followers are not great,lets pray 4 the misguided muslims who are away from Islam and indulging in terrorism,According to scholars from the world,We have to disown the terrorists who are killing innocents in the name of Jihad,get them arrested give their information to the Authorites and dont feel the pain when they are killed
Re: While all forms of religious fanaticism are negative, only Islam raises slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims) to a holy creed
by dingdong on Oct 03, 2008 02:34 AM
bhatkar ahamed,
Was that book written by your stupid "Arab" prophet ?
Re: While all forms of religious fanaticism are negative, only Islam raises slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims) to a holy creed
by dot on Oct 03, 2008 12:20 PM
well vignesh ,, it seems u have balls in ur head ...if u strap explosives to urself then u are a terrorist ... but if u bomb people with million dollar warplanes and missles then u are not RT? even if u nuke them ??? the fact is us army and the european armies are the biggest terrorists of this century and tens of centuries in the past
Re: While all forms of religious fanaticism are negative, only Islam raises slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims) to a holy creed
by Jayadevan prabhakaran on Oct 03, 2008 11:17 AM
No Vikas, Xtianity is the most violent religion on the face of earth...Then only Islam,..But I guess, the latter are catching up fast
Re: While all forms of religious fanaticism are negative, only Islam raises slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims) to a holy creed
by Kemal on Oct 03, 2008 12:09 AM
Christians killed not in the name of religion but to save their religion from Islamic barbarians. Yes, the fight is still ON.
Re: Re: While all forms of religious fanaticism are negative, only Islam raises slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims) to a holy creed
by Jayadevan prabhakaran on Oct 03, 2008 11:19 AM
No Kemal, Xtians hae wiped out entire races, & mostly with the sanction of the church..In Latin america, africa, australia, New Zealand...
Re: Re: While all forms of religious fanaticism are negative, only Islam raises slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims) to a holy creed
by dot on Oct 03, 2008 12:23 PM
ya sure ,, after all it was afghans and iraqs who have invaded usa & europe with there primitive weapons .. and dont forget the palastine ..they are also invading with there stones and petrol bombs RT ? U SHAMLESS MORON
Re: Re: While all forms of religious fanaticism are negative, only Islam raises slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims) to a holy creed
by Anshul on Oct 03, 2008 12:33 AM
Just introspect for few minutes and ask one question yourself. Were your ancestors terrorist?
Re: While all forms of religious fanaticism are negative, only Islam raises slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims) to a holy creed
by Kemal on Oct 03, 2008 12:37 AM
Bhatkar has gone insane or he must be smoking weed while writing these bunch of jokes. LOL!
Re: While all forms of religious fanaticism are negative, only Islam raises slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims) to a holy creed
by Indian on Oct 03, 2008 12:50 AM
Talk with Facts to support your claim What was the percentage of population Of Hindus in Pakistan during partition. Answer is 30%. What is percentage of Population of Hindus today in Pakistan....1-2%. What was the percentage of population Of Hindus in Kashmir before your ISI sponsered JIHAd activities .i.e pre 1989??. Answer is 15%. What is percentage of Population of Hindus today in Kashmir ....0%. What was the population of muslims in gujrat before the godhra riots 25%... and what is the population of muslims in gujrat today....BINGO its same 25%. DO you also want me to educate u about the percentage in bangladesh too? AND Why do Bangladeshi muslims want migrate that to illegally (shows their desperation) in INdia.....why dont youll FO
Re: Re: While all forms of religious fanaticism are negative, only Islam raises slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims) to a holy creed
by Indian on Oct 03, 2008 01:38 AM
Dear Sir...U very well know that no sane person wants to visit Pakistan example cricket team across the globe had refused to take part in Champions Trophy. Yes I 'may' agree with u on yr 2 nation theory and give away claim on Kashmir...But before that r u ready to accept all the muslims living in india (as said by yr father of yr nation) and transfer them to yr country....Trust me your country cannot afford to more than double up yr population. Youll did not accept the bihari muslim leave alone the others! .
Re: While all forms of religious fanaticism are negative, only Islam raises slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims) to a holy creed
by Indian on Oct 03, 2008 01:24 AM
The Muslim tyranny in India was as blood-thirsty and insidious as it was in all parts of the world that were unfortunate to be trampled by the Jihadis. The Hindus fought the Muslims on the battlefield, but did not go to the extent of slaughtering Muslim civilians and giving them the choice of Hinduism or death, Hindus did not molest Muslim women en masse, neither did they destroy, en masse, all Mosques, nor did they build Hindus temples over them (the Babri Masjid-Ramjanabhomi struggle being a one off and very belated case). Never did the Hindus, after a victory, impose a penal tax like the jaziya on all Muslims. There is no record of the defeated Muslims saving their skins by either jumping in to the common fire (as the Hindus Rajput womenfolk did in Jauhar) to avoid converting to Hinduism.
