One thing I know for sure is Mr. Arvind Lavakare is a Hardcore RSS man, like most RSS people spend all their time in interpreting history as per their conviction and logic and are under a false impression that GOd has bestowed sense and rational only in their heads and rest of the country is fool. Also Mr. Arvind Lavakare must be a bramhin.
I totally agree with the writer. Why is it that its always the Hindu's who are criticised for the riots! Who talks of the injustice, the murder and the rapes that take place daily to hinus in kashmir. Why was there a bandh for the killing of a girl killed with terrorists. just because she was a muslim? Was that a good reason for all political parties to gather at her funeral and declare a onelakh compensation. I think more than being toleratnt we are a cowards. Afraid of fighting for our rights and afraid of being called 'fundamentalist' and ashamed of being called 'hindus'.
Quite a biased report, but true in certain aspects.
Let's get to the bias first. This sentence says it all: "... the first reported Hindu-Muslim riot took place in 1713 AD -- 212 years before the RSS was formed, 251 years before the VHP was founded, and 289 years before the Gujarat riots broke out after 59 Hindus were burnt to death in a train." Why wouldn't you say, "... and 289 years before XXX Muslims were killed in the Gujarat riots, after 59 Hindus were burnt to death in a train."
We can ignore this report; it is lopsided. But hold on... it says more. Though it's all-Muslims-are-trouble-makers stance is absurd, I should, and will, accept that a population of Muslims is bent on establishing the Islamic community as bent on thuggery, bullyism and terrorism. They constitute only a tiny fraction, but, to spot dirt on a clear, white sheet, all you need is a speck of black.
Can't we, the Islamic community, wipe these idiots off? They are tarnishing our religion. Can't we outcast them? Can't we launch jihad against them?
About 8% of Brahmins occuppy more than 68% of group A jobs. More than 90% of university teachers are Brahmins. About 76% of the Journalists and almost all of those who control news are Brahmins. is that the great Indian tolerance. Where goes the dalit. If the above stated facts are taken for normal and 'Hindu'. there is no one more tolerant than the 'Hindu'. but if This tolerance is a result of the unchallenged supremacy of the Brahmin population, then there is something stinking right below, like the cow urine that they drink. Where are the millions of dalits, the SCs, STs and OBCs? A huge population is oppressed in the grossest ways, for more than 3000 years, or as long as RSS claims the great Indian culture existed. No other religion than Judaism and Brahminism can take credit for such discrimination and exploitaion. and the US Genocide is more tolerant than generations of such servitude and inhuman (Brhamin) exploitaion. If some of you who llive in the insulated cities cannot understand this, take a look at the slums and the pavements. A recent study by one of my friends in Chennai foudn that 99% of the people living on the pavements were dalits. THAT'S BRAHMINICISM.
RE:Who is the Tolerant Hindu?
by sahana joshi on Aug 07, 2004 04:22 PM
First. Let me tell you that Brahminism was a learning community.Thats why you find so many professors in University. After a long gap, the government has come up with reservation for SC,ST and other backward classes. Let these so called low caste people take advantage of this facility & prove themselves. Caste cant be blamed all the time. Let these dalits rise up and prove themselves,given so much government facilities and reservation!
