Discussion Board

Total 165 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9   Older >
aniketsoam999@rediffmail.com
It shouldn't be sent to OSCAR
by aniketsoam999@rediffmail.com on Jan 20, 2011 02:44 PM  | Hide replies

PL was cheap commercial film around TV news. And moreover it made FUN of suside of poor farmers in India.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
saarvesh tari
Re: It shouldn't be sent to OSCAR
by saarvesh tari on Jan 20, 2011 02:47 PM
lolz the movie show the reality of farmers in india ..n the truth abt media

   Forward   |   Report abuse
aniketsoam999@rediffmail.com
Re: It shouldn't be sent to OSCAR
by aniketsoam999@rediffmail.com on Jan 20, 2011 02:47 PM
It is like Rakhi Sawant Live. Issue less Cheap movie.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
vijay M
Re: It shouldn't be sent to OSCAR
by vijay M on Jan 20, 2011 02:48 PM
I didnt like the idea of using farmer suicides and trying to present it in an entertaining way. They were using an important issue for making money and also to get awards as the West likes to see India mired in poverty and suicides.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
aniketsoam999@rediffmail.com
Re: Re: It shouldn't be sent to OSCAR
by aniketsoam999@rediffmail.com on Jan 20, 2011 02:52 PM
Completely Agree... If poor would have seen this movie, they must have cried to see such cheap fun of suicides because of poverty.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Avinash Patalay
no chance
by Avinash Patalay on Jan 20, 2011 02:40 PM

==================================

peepli live a good movie but, IMHO didnt stand an iota of chance.

it was only aamir khan's marketing / promotional skills that made everyone lookup to it and seep it thru the india's official entry into oscars.

=======================================

    Forward  |  Report abuse
bellarynaga
Midget
by bellarynaga on Jan 20, 2011 02:40 PM

tried to fleece money off the singers of this movie and also sidelined the director..paid for his sins..third rate gooon..if he cares two hoots about awards, why send his movies to the Oscars...hypocrite...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
om shanti
All in a name
by om shanti on Jan 20, 2011 02:37 PM


If the name was "Shht-Dog Story" it could have got Oscars...

I donot think any recent director made great movies like the ones made by great Indian directors Satyajit Rai or Adoor Gopalakrishnan,but even their movies could not get oscar !

Slum Dog Millionaire got an Oscar because Indians were called Slum Dogs and it was profoundly told by a british..

If one shht-dog makes a movie on the shht-dog system of the country,then that movie cannot be considered suitable to win Oscar...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
deepak pandey
Slum Dog was for OSACAR??
by deepak pandey on Jan 20, 2011 02:36 PM

We indian have seen better movies...than this.. We indian have better music By A.R. Rehman earlier to this.

actually it was Slummy look of indian..which provided oscar

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 165 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9   Older >
Write a message