Discussion Board

Rahman: Islam has been hijacked


Total 335 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
srinivasan krishnamurthy
One World and all of are the children of the God!
by srinivasan krishnamurthy on Apr 05, 2010 12:01 PM  | Hide replies

All living creatures are equal to the god! Let's spread the language of Love.Let's not identify us only in terms of the belief. On the same hand let's try to communicate directly to the God in therms of the prayers.Love your neighbors!!!. Hate None!!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
venkat narayanan
Re: One World and all of are the children of the God!
by venkat narayanan on Apr 06, 2010 07:38 PM
yes. thats right.. you tell this to your Mullah neighbour and you can rest assured that there will be a bloodshed in your locality. Mullahs can never be trusted and should not be allowed to thrive. After all, they have been around for only a thousand years or so when learned men still wonder about the age of the eternal faith called Hinduism.. Whats not there in this faith.. Its amore a way of life than a religion.. It teaches righteousness and what not.. May be all other relions do the same but in Hinduidm nothing is enforced.. unlike in Mullahism where you are asked to pray 5 times and there are certain things like haram and sunnath.. etc etc.. Hinduism offers freedom of right to practise however you wanna do it.. Can anyone challenge this?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
D S
Re: brahma
by D S on Apr 05, 2010 05:01 AM  | Hide replies

did you read about cCreationismm from Saint aAbraham?

I dont want to write counters against your religion today, which can be a lot.

THAT SHOULD NOT BE OUR APPROACH, leave that approach to middle-east religions.

India has given us right to praise All Faith and we cannot forgo it via Conversion or by aligning only to one particular faith due to the radicals.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sarvesh dev
Re: Re: brahma
by sarvesh dev on Apr 05, 2010 11:09 PM
Why should we praise Faith that is intolerant and disrespects other faiths, spreads hatered and violence?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
aeges
brahma
by aeges on Apr 04, 2010 10:24 PM  | Hide replies

Supreme Brahma had an incestuous relationship with his daughter Satarupa...reading wny brahma has 4 heads.. he had five infact

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Salim KHAN
Re: brahma
by Salim KHAN on Apr 05, 2010 08:42 AM
aeges.... dont spread hate over here. Neither the Hindu, Muslim or christians are good enough. Everybody are hypocrates....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
abhi r
Re: brahma
by abhi r on Apr 05, 2010 12:33 AM
u fool .. he was fanatised by his own creation ... she was his creation ... not daughter born out of a union !

   Forward   |   Report abuse
D S
Re: Re: brahma
by D S on Apr 05, 2010 04:55 AM
did you read about cCreationismm from aAbraham?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
venkat narayanan
Re: Re: brahma
by venkat narayanan on Apr 06, 2010 07:41 PM
well said.. if that was the case, Brahma could never copulate as he is the one who creates all beings according to the Hindu faith.. Moreso, talk about incest and sexual stuff, Christinaity is full of such filth.. the recent scandal involving the Pope including..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
D S
Re: brahma
by D S on Apr 05, 2010 04:58 AM
did you read about cCreationismm from aAbraham?

I dont want to write counters against your religion today, which is a lot.

India has given us right to praise All faith and we cannot forgo it via conversion or aligning only to one particular faith due to radicals.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
D S
Re: on sati
by D S on Apr 04, 2010 08:22 PM  | Hide replies

In middle-east (of all current religions)
The slavery, burnt and killed both men and women at will... They could do anything to slave.
That was prevelant all over islamic nations.

In India, correction against Sati and many social evils mainly came from Indian saints using the British power..


    Forward  |  Report abuse
aeges
Re: Re: on sati
by aeges on Apr 04, 2010 10:26 PM
Indian saints like Nithyananda.... you human sacrificers

   Forward   |   Report abuse
D S
Re: Re: Re: on sati
by D S on Apr 05, 2010 04:54 AM
frauds are no saint....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
aeges
on sati
by aeges on Apr 04, 2010 07:56 PM  | Hide replies

I must admit that Indian womenfolk must be grateful to the Mughal kings who tried to ban sati and to the English General Napier who said :"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours"

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
abhimanyu
Re: on sati
by abhimanyu on Apr 05, 2010 03:17 PM
Sati was banned by the efforts of Rajaram Mohan Roy, not by Britishers or others.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
D S
Re: on sati
by D S on Apr 04, 2010 08:13 PM
slavery, burnt and killed both men and women at will...

that was prevelant all over islamic nations.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
saira
Re: Re: on sati
by saira on Apr 05, 2010 12:32 AM
Yes it was it was actually WORSE in arab nations, who were barbaric, and hence, God sent Muhammad (Pbuh)

He eliminated a LOT of those barbarism.

What you see as Islamic barbarism, they have been like that in the middle east BEFORE Islam.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
sarvesh dev
Re: Re: Re: on sati
by sarvesh dev on Apr 05, 2010 11:16 PM
Read life of Muhammad he spread more barbarism, just instead of fighting among themselves they started fighting every other. Read hadiths, Muhammad and his men used rape women after wars. He married Safiya on the same day he killed his father and husband. Is this not barbarism?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
D S
Re: Re: Re: on sati
by D S on Apr 05, 2010 04:53 AM
islamist practiced slavery...all the way until they were whipped by British....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
commie basher
Re: on sati
by commie basher on Apr 04, 2010 09:54 PM
sati started happening because mughal sultans will never allow any captured hindu girls. So, they started committing suicide over their husband's dead bodies. Islam brought dark ages in India. Allah rakha rahman has his version. But the reality is far from it. He may live in his dreams and nobody would object.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
D S
Re: on sati
by D S on Apr 04, 2010 08:18 PM
correction mainly came from Indian saints using British power..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Deepak MA
Re: on sati
by Deepak MA on Apr 04, 2010 09:20 PM
You are talking nonsense.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
abc efg
ARR u are not great enuf to..
by abc efg on Apr 04, 2010 07:28 PM  | Hide replies

to change the larger truth, what bloodshed and massacre your religion has historically represented. May be you are a good muslim just like many others who see things peacefully.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
abc efg
Re: ARR u are not great enuf to..
by abc efg on Apr 04, 2010 07:29 PM
(i-slam...violence in the name itself!)

an excerpt from this article..

". Will Durant argued in his 1935 book "The Story of Civilization: Our
Oriental Heritage" ....The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the
bloodiest story in history. The Islamic historians and scholars have
recorded with great glee and pride the slaughters of Hindus, forced
conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and
the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during
800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword
during this period. ....."

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
abc efg
Re: Re: ARR u are not great enuf to..
by abc efg on Apr 04, 2010 07:30 PM
read this :
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Hindus

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Total 335 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message