what is the problem in calling mumbai as mumbai .. if they had problem with then they shud hav voted against changing the name .. now once its done,, everyone shud obey and respect it .. no need to make any noise ..
Re: mumbai should be called mumbai ..
by dhak dhakgo on Oct 02, 2009 03:04 PM
i agree karan johar did do a mistake by telling mumbai as bombay..but whats a great fuss in that..wasnt this so called "mumbai" has a great history as "bombay"..this "bombay" has seen everything from war to independence..so now some publicity maniac politician takes up the issue..whr were his roots 20 yrs ago..wasnt he born in bombay"..whn the world goes hitech the name mite b changed to "mumbs"..thn what will this MNS do?..they have these petty issues n have nothing else to do..
i agree MNS fight over reservations for mumbaikar..even i support it...but its so called gundaraj is pathetic...can the maha govt pass a bill to restrict students of mumbai to go outside or have ajob outside..?..this thakrey is just a "bow bow" always in search of a occassion to showcase his 3rd grade crude dirty polotics
Re: Re: mumbai should be called mumbai ..
by Prabhas Ghosh on Oct 02, 2009 04:11 PM
instead of working towards the welfare of the society, MNS has been and is focused in just comparative politics, making stupid remarks on others, and inciting some kind of hatred on city names, dead people, languages, and creating regionalistic separation among the people, and past incidents. in fact they have no ideology to be proud of. Such devilish attitude of MNS leaders reminds me of the British attitude of "divide and rule". The only difference is is that we curse the British for inciting hatred amongst us during the period of slavery, but clap on similar remarks made by these opportunistic leaders..Jai ho!!
Re: mumbai should be called mumbai ..
by chandramouli sankaraseshan on Oct 02, 2009 02:24 PM
yes if by mistake people tell Bombay, then you should stop screening of movies
