Re: stop beliveing in eyes
by rakesh on Jun 17, 2009 03:34 PM
means he did but due to all the things abt his eyes dont belive him and all.please we indians are like this.....we fight with each other... please.reply from Rakesh
Re: This is fishy
by Indian on Jun 19, 2009 12:10 PM
please name women (with address) ho do this and inform police about it, if u are so sure. Please come to police station and give all information u have.
Re: Punishment
by Meet on Jun 17, 2009 01:13 PM
He should be thrown to the hardcore criminals in jail to satisfy their desires. Criminals will declare that it was done with mutual consent. Tit for TAT.
Re: Re: Punishment
by kishore patnaik on Jun 17, 2009 01:25 PM
u mean attracting section 377 of IPC but in that case the matter of consent of other wise will not serve the purpose- courtsey for sake of legal awareness to discourage the persons who repose confidence in rule of jungle
Re: Re: Re: Punishment
by Meet on Jun 17, 2009 03:31 PM
Criminals will declare that it was done with mutual consent before Taliban court and not Indian Court.
Re: Re: Re: Punishment
by Meet on Jun 17, 2009 12:54 PM
Sorry not u, this filthy actor should be sent to afghanistan for trial and punishment in the hands of Taliban
Re: Re: Re: Re: Punishment
by kishore patnaik on Jun 17, 2009 01:16 PM
also we indian have no extradition treaty with talibans to surrender our subjects to the domain of rule of jungle
Re: Re: Re: Re: Punishment
by kishore patnaik on Jun 17, 2009 01:04 PM
thanking you for not sending me to afghanisthan for trial before the rule of Jungle
Re: Re: Punishment
by kishore patnaik on Jun 17, 2009 12:51 PM
I am a true Indian subject to domain of Indian laws not of rule of jungle at elsewhere in India
Re: Re: Re: Punishment
by kishore patnaik on Jun 17, 2009 12:54 PM
I am a true Indian subject to domain of Indian laws not of rule of jungle at elsewhere than in India
Re: Punishment
by Akram on Jun 17, 2009 11:37 AM
The perpetrators of henious crime like ahuja escape from clutches of law with ease. he should be subjected to public bashing so that no one dare to repeat the act.
this routine is common in bollywood. the indusdtry actor and actress never get satisfaction from single marriage. most of the time the affairs will be on consensus. but in some case like this girl when they want to make money they alleage of rape... All actors and actress are like this. not only shiney ahuja
last night when I wrote a message in following lines which attracted lots of criticisms so the mesage speaks- The incidence speaks the maid help is of consented party to the incident becoz what made the maid help to reach the home of actor though she was molested in the previous day- certainly actor was made scapegoat for the unholy desires of vested persons to make undue enrichment and sensetisation of news for news sake or for what?
To the critics My answers are as in the following lines which speaks- Re: Re: CONCOCTIONS FOR SAKE OF SENSATISATION by kishore patnaik on Jun 17, 2009 08:20 AM i know your reaction a obvious one but law is like that I spoke on law lines as being a practising lawyer I solicit your reactions with positive respect but be on single mindedness but not of double standards ask your self r u not an animal at first instance then other things Thankq for u r reactions
Re: Re: CONCOCTIONS FOR SAKE OF SENSATISATION by kishore patnaik on Jun 17, 2009 08:39 AM as a matter of fact more than 90% of cases of rape ultimate result is of acquittal of accused for want of sufficient evidence and often the act proves positive then the consent is the reasons for acquittal often .So try to understand and understand the basic instincts of man and dwelling circumstances and law of jungle where man has no option than the might n law of land with stipulated laws to protect the victims and to make orderly society
Re: Re: Re: CONCOCTIONS FOR SAKE OF SENSATISATION
by kishore patnaik on Jun 17, 2009 09:08 AM
Re: Re: CONCOCTIONS FOR SAKE OF SENSATISATION by kishore patnaik on Jun 17, 2009 08:55 AM I know more than 50% of our minor girls are being subjected to some kind of sexual molestation at one stage or other in one form or other in their lifetime even by their own ppl they trust as protectors. I m also father to a minor girl child can understand feel the tragedy when our own ppl r subjected to. but basics r basics even I find minor girls blame their own protectors stumbling blocks for their advancements of sexual desires in the name of true love [often proves farce for sake of satisfaction of sexual desires] Try to be realistice and understand the instictive charecters of a man n women who are basically having animal tendicies n so hipocrity please
Re: the fact
by YoBro on Jun 17, 2009 07:58 AM
LOL, wear and tear! Nicely put, bro. Also, people tend to forget that if the male has long finger-mails that haven't been manicured in a while, then consensual sex can lead to cuts and bruises on the opposite party's hands and legs or elsewhere. All of these things will come in handy in the defense's arguments. The best she can hope for is a money settlement. I do believe he is guilty of adultery, tho'...
Re: Re: the fact
by Andy Louis on Jun 17, 2009 08:15 AM
YoBro and Indian Patriot..Please send you sisies or some 16-17 year girl relatives from your family to Shiny to find out if the reasons you guys metioned are for real..
Re: Re: Re: the fact
by YoBro on Jun 17, 2009 08:18 AM
ah, the good ol' "when you can't counter an attack with wit, throw in a personal punch or hit below the belt" tactic. Loser, get a life! What we stated are simple facts of life - but too hard to enter your thick head. I guess you've never had sex in your life. Please leave this forum. It is for grown-ups.
Re: Re: To all the moral police and right wing nuts in this forum
by YoBro on Jun 17, 2009 08:23 AM
no...the word you're lookin' for is "honest" and "independent thinker".
Re: Who wouldn't want to do a maid..
by vicky singh on Jun 17, 2009 07:09 AM
yur sucha an idiot..so yur advocating the view that garl shud not come out as rape victim??? just cuz retards like yu sittin here judging that she wants to get rich.. wot if she didnt demand any money? wot if the only thing she wants is teach him a lession??
Re: Re: Who wouldn't want to do a maid..
by prabhakar timothy on Jun 17, 2009 07:50 AM
stupid.. yobro is right. the girl wants to make a fast buck. The rape charge is only a concocted story. It is sex with consent.
Re: Who wouldn't want to do a maid..
by J Chandrasekhar on Jun 17, 2009 07:02 AM
The fact that she is a minor and this loser is twice the age of the victim show not have corrupted your honesty except regular watching of x rated films. Also, a girl who is molested need not commit suicide, she has complained. Better check up your sick mind
