who is this Jim Rogers, where was he for all these years? Should a Govt. make policies to suit a single person? If he sold his stake in India, why should one bother? Better he should look after his country's economy and advice his president. We withstood all the recent global recessions. U.S economy had crumbled for its wrong policies and Jim's advice suits such wrong policies.
Re: Waste of time to read the article
by Useless Comments on Sep 21, 2015 08:40 AM
he is the person to whom our PM promised that invest in india.. india has changed... and he is telling us nothing or only little has changed... it is only hawabazi.. with paid news channels and media house
Re: Re: Waste of time to read the article
by siva siva siva on Sep 23, 2015 08:40 AM
It is high time for rediff to come out of it's anti modi,anti hindu stance,otherwise people will reject you,for you salman khan's sister getting pregnet is a news,how low you guys have stooped
Why this rediff is going on producing some old rags again and again . it might be due to support of some diggi or raga or talica or some thugs who are Anti- india . if it is a mature media one should be more mature and no need to explore immeturity again and again
Indians have done bad karma,we believe these politicians to make our life better, but each guy comes enjoys and screws us. Modi is no better. He only bak baks and we foolish Indians believe. High time we come into real India,poverty,garbage,high price,corruption,taxes vip culture,diseases and adjusting Indians. Jai ho.
Re: Indiza
by haya vada na on Sep 19, 2015 07:10 AM
Mrs or Ms anita jadhav why you ver keeping quiet when some inexperienced women was ruling country from behind the screen ? why didnt you express and now you are expressing ?
rediff is the most anti modi website that is there. They don't let a change go when they can publish an article that criticise modi and his governance, and they also choose the time when to bring out such articles. They have published this article to conincide with the bihar election. You think people can't look through your game, give your readers some credit atleast.
This article has been running for over a week now. How long is rediff going to post this? OR is this article going to be permanently on rediff? And what is the purpose of running this article for so long?
Rogers has flourished as a parasite on other's enterprise, he is not a visionary but a profit taker with a parasites vision, no matter how legendary. Rediff has resorted to presenting Roger as a person who's views span the grand spectrum of the aspirations of the people of India at every level that matters- this attempt is laughable.
