Discussion Board

Singur Act 'unconstitutional', says Kolkata High Court


Total 212 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
puliyadi rajamurthy
Arrogant Politics!!
by puliyadi rajamurthy on Jun 22, 2012 07:35 PM  | Hide replies

It is shameful to Mamta's Arrogant and Cheap Politics.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Jhingala Paplis
Re: Arrogant Politics!!
by Jhingala Paplis on Jun 22, 2012 08:12 PM
she is cheap slum dweller.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
tls mani
No consequence
by tls mani on Jun 22, 2012 06:44 PM  | Hide replies

Court orders don't count on this Pagli didi.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Jhingala Paplis
Re: No consequence
by Jhingala Paplis on Jun 22, 2012 07:58 PM
Court order get her Poo-wet!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
CleverCongGame
Re: Re: No consequence
by CleverCongGame on Jun 23, 2012 12:10 AM

THESE tongueLICKERS ARE MAKING DOSAandIDLI,

FOR THEIR G0DcalledS0NIA.

ANYWAY forHAMID, WHY HE LICKINGher,

AS femaleG0D NOT ALLOWED,

AND ALSO NOT ALLOWED toW0RSHIP ANY otherG0D.

SO THEN WHY HAMIDiz W0RSHIPPINGher?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
raman govindan
Tatas win Singur case, setback for Mamata
by raman govindan on Jun 22, 2012 06:28 PM  | Hide replies

it is an open and shut case!

Mamtaji misread the legal angle or had wrong advice!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Jhingala Paplis
Re: Tatas win Singur case, setback for Mamata
by Jhingala Paplis on Jun 22, 2012 08:00 PM
She is an uneducated slum dweller how can she know the legal angle of the case?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
raman govindan
Re: Re: Tatas win Singur case, setback for Mamata
by raman govindan on Jun 22, 2012 09:55 PM
the insunuation is wrong. one can take a wrong decision. we should not call names on account of it!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sumit mukherjee
Re: Re: Re: Tatas win Singur case, setback for Mamata
by sumit mukherjee on Jun 23, 2012 02:32 PM
ok trinafool. let us know one smart decision she has taken so far?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jayakiran MR
Congrats!!
by Jayakiran MR on Jun 22, 2012 06:03 PM

Congrats!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
paper india
Unconstitutional !
by paper india on Jun 22, 2012 02:56 PM

Now even the court says that one of the first legislation passed by Mamata after assuming power was.........UNCONSTITUTIONAL ! But then, when has the lady ever bothered about anything apart from her bloated ego !

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Debanjan
First CPM then this TMC all ruined Bengal
by Debanjan on Jun 22, 2012 02:51 PM  | Hide replies

There were monkeys before we now have bunch of goats..


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Biplab
Re: First CPM then this TMC all ruined Bengal
by Biplab on Jun 22, 2012 02:53 PM
Both are bad tasted!!!!!!! But people have to eat one of them, no way.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Kunjal Joshi
Re: Re: First CPM then this TMC all ruined Bengal
by Kunjal Joshi on Jun 22, 2012 07:37 PM
Need some interospection here. Leaders merely represent people.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jhingala Paplis
Re: Re: First CPM then this TMC all ruined Bengal
by Jhingala Paplis on Jun 22, 2012 08:04 PM
Try to haveCow&Pig!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
vandanagoyal
Drama is over
by vandanagoyal on Jun 22, 2012 02:45 PM  | Hide replies

Mamta got what she wanted and now their neice and nephews will enjoy life for next 10 years.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
vandanagoyal
Re: Drama is over
by vandanagoyal on Jun 22, 2012 03:30 PM
She got enough to make a script of this drama.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
M
TATAs served much greater
by M on Jun 22, 2012 02:23 PM

TATAs served much greater than any politician of the land

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sabyasachi kar
Compromise with Tata
by sabyasachi kar on Jun 22, 2012 02:17 PM  | Hide replies

This is a serious turning point for the local government.I think there is nothing wrong to discuss the issue with the TATAs. TATAs are serving the state for decades and very friendly to the cause of the society. The interest for the farmers can be restored indirectly so that their living could be improved. The industrial climate needs to restored but amicably keeping the interest of land owners in mind. A good dialogue is necessary. Nobody should feel looser or winner. It is the interest of the State and the people at large that should get the priority. No fighting or mud slanging please.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
aparna bhardwaj
Re: Compromise with Tata
by aparna bhardwaj on Jun 22, 2012 06:17 PM
So simplistic that its daft - for someone who lost 1200 crore.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 212 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
Write a message