This Ratan Tata once in West Bengal was praising Left Front Government and even wrote several open letters to the then gov. stating that for Ms Mamata Banerjee is not allowing the state to get developed. Now yesterday he send a letter to the new chief minister stating that she only can lead the state to the improvement. This is Ratan Tata. Once CPM was his most favourite party. Today he has changed the side. Did he not think about the poor people when he snached the cultivating land of the farmers of Singur? Atlast Mukesh Ambani has not built his palace by snatching poor farmers'land.
Re: About Ratan Tata
by CrystalClear on May 23, 2011 04:20 PM
You havc a point on farmer's land acquisition, however land acquisition there was done by WB state govt. not the company.
Re: Re: About Ratan Tata
by Krishnendu Biswas on May 23, 2011 04:43 PM
Ratan Tata knew very well that he was going to setup the project in the lands of poor farmers which were acquired forcefully. Where was his humanitarian face that time?
Capitalist society has cons too. Mr. M.Ambani is an example of that. He ha monoply in petrochemical based polymers and control the market & govt. on its demand-supply & pricing. Govt. could have installed polymer crakers, but was influenced by RIL not to do so. Plastic manufacturers depends on RIL to run their factory, the day they import granules, their inland supply is affected forever in India. RIL buys cheaper oils & fuels from govt. oil companies and sells back to them at market prices... however RIL has done no wrong as govt. is responsible for this. However one can wonder govt. can follow this policy by having political elections etc. in mind.
All said and done, power yields influence & monoploy but should be used in constructive way, RIL is smart company to utilise path to success by hook or ..., but there should be healty competition in market. Political influence (e.g. Sterlite industries case on purchase of Crain Energy required RIL's informal permison etc. are bad for economy).
Tata is company with humanity at heart. They follow sound principles of business in cut-throat competition but with social responsibility.
Our business leaders should ponder about philathropic & social dvelopment of country as well. Inequality is not at all good for society as it leads to huge social/ anti-social revolutions, history has witnessed that.
he bribed DMK for his 2G licesnsces and cheated farmers not only in WB, he also made sure that noone sets up steel plant in somestates where tata steel factory located. he is unknown criminal minded person
How come a Khandani Gangu Teli will ever know what is the duty towards mankind or society. Their only motive in life is to make hand2mouth from dirt2gold.
Re: Re: Who would TATA choose?.
by Curiosity on May 23, 2011 04:05 PM
Not me, why?. If i trap Ratan Tata in Recommendation letter magic like Amitab using Indira Gandhi recommendation letter, and now if i use recommendation letter from notable people like Hillary Clinton, will TATA says no?.
Re: Re: Who would TATA choose?.
by peacelover on May 23, 2011 04:05 PM
Tata passenger cars lack the refinement and quality. They do a crude job in car making and pass it on to the gullible consumers. Going by all the facts now coming out, all that they profess to be honest in all their dealings is far from true.
I had great respect for this gentleman once .. now i damn care about the selfish guy .. he speaks good things on media but on personal front i think the company has lost ethics because of him .. 2G scam - He is the front runner in bribibg raja and also wrote letter to karuna on good work by raja (now people know what good work he has done ) He speaks of high ethics for himself - if you listen to radia tapes of his conversation - this womaniser have a fox heart inside .. HE HAS DONE NOTHING BIG TO THE SOCIETY AND CRITICISING ANOTHER FIT FOR NOTHING MUKESH AMBANI - BOTH SHOULD BE TAKEN CARE BY CBI / ED / IT ..THESE ARE THE 2 BIGGEST FRAUDSTERS WHICH INDIA HAS ASHAMED OF PRODUCING
Re: Ratan Tata - not a wise man
by GRINDIAN on May 23, 2011 04:04 PM
dear Chandru , you are a novice and ignorent totally that you do not know Tata philothropies and Tata Institutions serving this very poor nation for decades. Get educated . Tatas are Ambanis who earn 18 % interest from their own employees . Ask Reliance guys , they would tell stories of greed by Shthaji Mukesh . Tatas are god like !
Re: Re: Ratan Tata - not a wise man
by priyabrata Pattanaik on May 23, 2011 04:16 PM
Well said Grinian. I wish people should educate themselves a bit more before commenting. TATAs have given this country a number of institutions. TISS, TIFR, TMH to name a few. How can anyone even compare TATAs with a company like Reliance.
Re: Re: Ratan Tata - not a wise man
by chandar reddy on May 23, 2011 04:12 PM
dear grindian
i respect tata philothropies ,but the man who is heading is taking them to the bottom .. pls read the stories of GRD tata ..also i hate reliance guys also they damn care about society
Well said Tataji. Instead of building such an odd looking structure, he should have started a money transfer scheme for the poor. Half of poverty in India would be eliminated. Govt would save a lot on maintaining the statistics of BPL(below poverty line) people. Although this would create more lazy people in India would be a different matter atleast, India can boast of developed nation, thanks to Mukesh's intelligence and Dhirubhai's legacy.
He earned and he spent. He deserves it he can hold business meetings and call the investors and command his terms. Cmon ya he is a King and he has every right to build his palace.
Re: equal
by paul theo on May 23, 2011 03:59 PM
THE AMBANIS ARE SUCKERS. MADE MONEY BY DUBIOUS MEANS. WHAT TATA SAID IS RIGHT. AMBANIS HAVE NO MORALS , THEY NEVER DO CHARITY. THEY MAKE MERRY WITH PUBLIC MONEY.
Re: equal
by GRINDIAN on May 23, 2011 04:13 PM
really ? How do you know . Ask Ambani employyes , thay give Gali to him for bllod sucker attitude . Ask Tata employees ,ther are all praise for them ! .
