This talk of "branding" and "ideology" lost for the leftists leading to their loss in Bengal is all rubbish. True they lost that many years ago but the real reason of defeat was the fear they had installed in the daily life of rural and semi-urban population who were made to understand in clear cut language that is you are either RED or you are against it, there can be no neutral. A number of these rural and semi-urban voters did not get the chance to exercise their voting rights for the past many elections. But this time around, thanks to "DIDI" and the Election Commission they could not be stopped in expressing their anger against the Leftists.
So called CPI(M) has illegally running in and around 100 unauthorised taxi stand by taking Rs. 5- Rs.10 for every passenger from the taxi drivers they take to any destination. Almost running a parallel government and polished extortion. This is a simple single example. And this happens in colleges and universities in one way or the other. UNCIVILIZED PARTY.
Re: Cheap money extrotion from poor people
by Prem Mohan on May 14, 2011 08:57 AM
This happens in many parts of India. In fact, people who run these rackets are known to rise in politics and even become ministers.
Communists and particularly core commitee with full of dependency parasites, not capable of winning a zptc seat, who lost their principles and ism through extortionism and who are trapped successfully in consultancy "catbury chocolates" thrown by capitalism Gods. Time to Introspect and get back to your books with mind rather than mugging up to get or hang onto power through any means including mean and vile on innocent and ignorants.
Introspect the network seeded by hypocrite Jyoti Basu during two decades who got his english education to sudue Bengalis with no primary education in english itself.
Why the network partially dimantled by Prakash Karat and Buddadev Bhattacharya worked against their party itself including Somnath Chatterjee?.
Introspect why people are deprived in getting awareness through education to generate wealth though baits of distributing lands to poor brought name and fame?.
Why Indian Communism who copied Marxism from western countries could not entertain internal democracy which Stalin too did and went into history for good?. That too , inspite of Indian Communists openly proclaiming they support parliamentary form of democracy?.
Re: Though very late, Time to Instrospect- Ignorant Indian Commun
by Volga Volga on May 14, 2011 12:13 AM
Lenin and Stalin , stalwarts and mavericks of Marxcism and Communism glory too respected rationalism and importance of education to understand high five communism principles couldn't inspire slavery stricken desi communists inspite of adequate forewarnings to communism roots in India from last couple of years?.
Entire world knows Stalin bit the dust just because of dread and terror tactics he used to implement his principles rather than raising awareness among citizens through education which backfired communism in Russia couldn't inspire the slavery stricken core commitee of indian communism?.
Wake up before Tripura too kicks you slaves and donkeys...
Congrats to people of Bengal. Atlast they have solved the problem of life by commiting suicide. That's right. From frying pan to fire. They won'nt have to survive difficulties of life. They don't have any idea of Agenda of Diddi. Just voted for her to escape from 34 years of fying pan and fallen into fire. That's the end of the story.
As discarded the domicile status of each people on 78.janta-bjp-cpm/govt.! Which people were acquired by freedom movement, as India adopts the Democratic-Republic constituency on 1956. In true sense India runback the era before 1947! As India now produce terrorism like British-colonial era in each state as all political party confined by fund of multi-national-company to conduct election! Moreover now electronic /print media all are control by corporate house, as well as all political party come to be company sponsor party in exchange of public sponsor party, as people seen. Naturally Marxists party of west Bengal become farmer killer as seen Nandigram to Netai and Bengal submerge in state sponsor terrorism by last three decades? As people ultimately reject the left govt. if Trinomul-govt. not follow the co-opt base agro-economy in rural area, in exchange of IRON-SEZ like Jindal at forest zone people will reject like CPM shortly, as base label worker move to cast the vote to Trinomul by giving commitment to people that Jindal-iron-SEZ reject by Trinomul like Nandigram though senior leadership may innocent about the same. In fact people like to remain in Democratic-Republic setup by any means which is the main rhythm of Indian people as he reject the company sponsor CPM-party by 2011 assembly election of west Bengal?
The eternal battle in human civilization is not about cong vs bjp, or left vas cong or democrats vs republicans or india vs pak or us vs china. Fo ages 'we' humen have thrived to decide on one fundamental query " Do we want to be totally selfish, think about our own good w/o bothering about others around us or do we want to share, try to make everyone grow?" Those who justifies selfish ideology are the capitalist who enjoys the 80% resources inspite of being 20% of the population. Those who follows the other ideology are the socialist/communist block.From the onset of civilization, many kings & rulers tried to exploit common men for their own luxury, own growth. They used media, religion, false propoganda etc to justify their deeds, at the end they were beaten. So communism always wins over capitalism at the end but human beings are by nature selfish mostly n thats why capitalism survives, manipulates & thrives. In mahabharat Kauravas were the capitalists, Pandavas the socialist, in the era of gupta Chankya & chndragupta were the communist and they trhew out the capitalist ruler, during independence struggle british were the capitalist, cong was more like a socialist force, Jyoti babu's left was a communist bt S.S.Roy's cong was a capitalist, Buddh's left turned out to be a pro-capitalisat, mamta metamorphed into a socilist. Bengal has remained where it was, it has selected a communist ideology apparently. Bu
Re: Eternal battle between Left and Right
by Niharika Sharma on May 13, 2011 11:05 PM
Bengal has remained where it was, it has selected a communist ideology apparently. But Mamta is a fake socialist that people will relise very soon. Just like selfish human will not evaporate overnight, so will the good hearted, kind humen. Capitalism will survive and so will socilism. As long as 20% people keep exploiting the rest 80%, as long as 80% will have to fight for 20% remaning resources communism will remain relevent. It may just re-invent itself but no one can deny the good roles played by the Left forces in india. Thanks to them, we are still financially not totally looted or sold. Now the real capitalist loot will start as the left voice is killed for the time being. Be ready to pay bigger price for everything for some time.
Re: Re: Eternal battle between Left and Right
by Joy Gupta on May 14, 2011 09:08 AM
Whether Mamata is a fake socialist or street smart performer, time will only prove.
However, CPM is an incorrigible party. Left ideology is not bad but their is no capability among the current brass of leaders and the ideology is also based on too idealistic situations which is difficult to practise in modern era. History has manifested this in various nations like Russia, Yugoslavia, Czeck etc. where communist leaders were corrupt by the absolute power which they enjoyed. Their disintegrations are true depiction of people's frustration and loss of trust on the communists.
History is testimony to the fact that socialism could never be practiced properly and the leaders have actually exploited common people in the name of socialism. Even China is not an exception. Same story goes in WB where the party-ism prevailed over everything else and the greed for power blinded one and all in the Left thinktank.
Case in point is late Prof. Santosh Bhattacharya who, despite being a communist himself, took on single-handedly on Alimuddin street's might in 1980s by resisting CPM's concerted bid to politicise education in general & CU in particular. Bhattacharya's tenure as VC from 1984-1987 made regular headlines for his valiant refusal to buckle under political pressure even as Left-backed CU teachers, non-teaching staff and the SFI tried every trick dharnas, blockades and gheraos to make it impossible for Bhattacharya to function.
Re: Re: Re: Eternal battle between Left and Right
by Joy Gupta on May 14, 2011 09:16 AM
This followed the Left Front government's refusal to accept his very appointment in 1984 by then state governor A P Sharma. The Governor exercised his discretion as the university's chancellor and selected Bhattacharya from a panel of three names put up to him by the CU Senate, disregarding the state government's advice to appoint its preferred panelist. The Left could do little as the chancellor's decision was binding under the CU statute. Bhattacharya's name made it to the panel with the backing of non-CPM(RSP-supported) as well as anti-Left members in the university's policy-making body. Incidentally, Bhattacharya was a card-carrying member of the undivided CPI from his student days but parted ways with the party when he turned a believer in market economics after China began liberalising its economy.
This shows how CPM thinktank was blinded and intoxicated by the power and resultantly turned unreasonable and dictatorian during their rule.
We hope the people of WB are able to exercise their rights in free and fair manner in the coming years too. Then only will they be able to crack the whips on the non-performing and anti-people politicians.
The examples for the failure of CPM are plenty, but the sad part is that the party thinktank and its supporters are turning a blind eye to all this and instead are busy in Mamata bashing.
I hope they haven't forgotten the golden rule that when one finger is pointed at others, four fingers point back at themselves.
Re: Re: Eternal battle between Left and Right
by Sandeep Mitra on May 14, 2011 12:08 AM
I totally agree with u nikarika ..Let LIC, SBI & other govt institution get sold to private parties & then common man will start realising the pain for not having the left forces in picture.
Re: Re: Eternal battle between Left and Right
by Prabodh Saha on May 14, 2011 01:58 AM
Very nice viewpoint. The balance is gone, now. Stock Market celebrated the winning of the Fake Socialist: Mamata.
Re: Re: Eternal battle between Left and Right
by sujit sengupta on May 14, 2011 10:57 AM
People have alerday ralised that how Budhdhu babu can fake his face with a mask and then keep on saying lies.
The eternal battle in human civilization is not about cong vs bjp, or left vas cong or democrats vs republicans or india vs pak or us vs china. Fo ages 'we' humen have thrived to decide on one fundamental query " Do we want to be totally selfish, think about our own good w/o bothering about others around us or do we want to share, try to make everyone grow?" Those who justifies selfish ideology are the capitalist who enjoys the 80% resources inspite of being 20% of the population. Those who follows the other ideology are the socialist/communist block.From the onset of civilization, many kings & rulers tried to exploit common men for their own luxury, own growth. They used media, religion, false propoganda etc to justify their deeds, at the end they were beaten. So communism always wins over capitalism at the end but human beings are by nature selfish mostly n thats why capitalism survives, manipulates & thrives. In mahabharat Kauravas were the capitalists, Pandavas the socialist, in the era of gupta Chankya & chndragupta were the communist and they trhew out the capitalist ruler, during independence struggle british were the capitalist, cong was more like a socialist force, Jyoti babu's left was a communist bt S.S.Roy's cong was a capitalist, Buddh's left turned out to be a pro-capitalisat, mamta metamorphed into a socilist. Bengal has remained where it was, it has selected a communist ideology apparently. Bu
The eternal battle in human civilization is not about cong vs bjp, or left vas cong or democrats vs republicans or india vs pak or us vs china. Fo ages 'we' humen have thrived to decide on one fundamental query " Do we want to be totally selfish, think about our own good w/o bothering about others around us or do we want to share, try to make everyone grow?" Those who justifies selfish ideology are the capitalist who enjoys the 80% resources inspite of being 20% of the population. Those who follows the other ideology are the socialist/communist block.From the onset of civilization, many kings & rulers tried to exploit common men for their own luxury, own growth. They used media, religion, false propoganda etc to justify their deeds, at the end they were beaten. So communism always wins over capitalism at the end but human beings are by nature selfish mostly n thats why capitalism survives, manipulates & thrives. In mahabharat Kauravas were the capitalists, Pandavas the socialist, in the era of gupta Chankya & chndragupta were the communist and they trhew out the capitalist ruler, during independence struggle british were the capitalist, cong was more like a socialist force, Jyoti babu's left was a communist bt S.S.Roy's cong was a capitalist, Buddh's left turned out to be a pro-capitalisat, mamta metamorphed into a socilist. Bengal has remained where it was, it has selected a communist ideology apparently. Bu
Mamtha has won a big battle of removing communisim. Very few in the world has done that. It was said its only a batlle won if cuba and bengal out wits it....a lady has done it. Hats off. Let peace and DEMOCRACY prevail.
