in this daynage.... its pathetic to see rediff using a cheap camera for reporting.... the photographs look like a chap b grade bollywood film poster.... ever heard of DLSR's????
Re: cheap photography
by EmKay on Nov 14, 2010 11:34 AM
First of all, it is DSLR. Then again no one can tell if the pictures were taken with a cheap camera because all those pictures appear to be taen under low light conditions. To take pictures under low light one would generally need a tripod to use longer exposure times. Just so you know, using "DLSR" does not automatically produce great pictures if one does not know how to take pitcures.
Re: Re: cheap photography
by Yak Suri on Nov 14, 2010 12:52 PM
u r a wank ..... it was a typo... secondly u can increase the aperture size to capture more light and donot need a tripod.... finally you urselves typed it as DLSR in the end
Re: Oh Falak
by Cutlet Gravy on Nov 14, 2010 06:42 AM
Your right. Oh Falak!
For an article such as this The pictures don't do it any justice.
Oh Falak!!
To sign off with :
Well, if Hyderabad had been on the itinerary of Barack Obama, he would have been awestruck!
These words seem so inappropriate.
You could have shown us the toilets in the servant quarters and said:
Barak Obama son of Kenyan, Hussein Obama (step son of Indonesian,Barry Sotero) would have been most at home squatting on his haunches in the Nizam's servants' Kuckoose.
Re: Falaknuma Palace hotel
by sanjay lotlekar on Nov 13, 2010 11:39 PM
Dear have you ever seen at least a 3 star hotel....dnt write stupid things & show people that you are an idiot
Hello Readers. I paid many visits to Falaknuma Palace between 2005-2009 as I was having a my old friend working in Taj Group. He spent about 25-30 years of his life in the Palace and he had a thorough levels of association (family friendship too) with the Nizams 3 generations who settled in Switzerland and Australia. What was revealed by Nizams descendents to him was that Palace on top of the hill in Hyderabad was very old dating back to 11th Century A.D. Prior to Nizams, it was under Kutubshahis of Golkonda (Bahamani Rulers). It was also told by Nizam grand daughters that Srikrishnadevaraya of Vijaynagar Kingdom spent about 12 days in the palace in 1529 A.D. and some of the gifts by Krishnadevaraya to Golkonda sultans were later taken away by Aurangazeb on his march to Golkonda from Aurangabad/Daulatabad. Aurangazeb annexed Golkonda fort under Moghul dominions and kept Nizam as the Ruler with jurisdiction of Telangana-North Kannada-Marathwada. During Nizams rule, the palace got renovated to this modern style. This Palace is of highly Historical Significance which was hidden by the ages. Particularly Bahamani sultans spent a lot of their time here after hunting in the surrounding forests in those days. Tata's should preserve this Palace properly.
Re: Re: Falaknuma was part of Kakatiya Dynasty during 11th Centur
by Tere Baap on Nov 14, 2010 10:29 AM
even the mullahs occupied ur home & fam guess what happen
Re: loot ka maal
by umar farooq on Nov 13, 2010 12:05 PM
dhondu..it was a separate country at that time and merged with INDIA later on.take some tution on history before making a fool out of yourself by posting such comments
Re: Re: loot ka maal
by Ray on Nov 13, 2010 06:51 PM
umar farooq and sameen khan unfortunately are by products of what Nizams and others did to Indian women and people in general.... here comes the funny/sad part....instead of having their anger on these rulers ...people like umar are the ones who have become lawyers for their own tormentors...
