symbol of love because the sweat and blood of the workers for 22 long years had gone unrewarded for them. But I will not argue in favour that an ancient Shiv temple was present or that a foreigner built it. What I will argue is it NEED NOT BE DEMOLISHED BECAUSE OF HINDU FANATICS. It in fact being a tourist spot will give jobs to a lot of people. People should see that. But I ALSO WILL NOT JOIN THE SECULAR BRIGADE, because they don't have the guts to criticise the wrongs plaguing the minority communities.
Now who built Taj Mahal is not a question, those who are built architectural marvel using our many and using our labourm si it is Govt Property Now solution is change the name as Tejo Mahal.
Re: Re: Taj Mahal to Tejo Mahal
by Karthik Sarath S on Oct 27, 2017 05:13 PM
It has to be ascertained if it is Tejo mahal and why everyone is scared of scared of the search ? Let truth prevail.
Re: Re: Taj Mahal to Tejo Mahal
by saurabh mukherjee on Oct 27, 2017 11:24 PM
Some are fanatic if the protect their identity but others are not if they do the same.. sad to see a lack of unity in the name of freedom and liberty.
Re: Re: Taj Mahal to Tejo Mahal
by saurabh mukherjee on Oct 27, 2017 11:36 PM
Some are fanatic if the protect their identity but others are not if they do the same.. sad to see a lack of unity in the name of freedom and liberty.
This is just another good building which can be seen once . I donât agree that is this us symbol of love as know the history of Shahjahan as well as mumtaj begum . Having said that I also insist that there better buildings and monuments all over country which are better in architecture and also reflects true cultural heritage of India
Re: Rename the building as it is now our property
by abhinav sharma on Oct 26, 2017 07:26 PM
And just why should that be done when there is absolutely no proof of this false notion.
Re: Re: Rename the building as it is now our property
by Srinivas R on Oct 26, 2017 07:34 PM
There is every proof for it. Its the Indira Gandhi govt. which stopped the ASI to reveal it and do further excavation. How do I know this ? - I have read article written by ex-ASI chief about it.
Re: Re: Re: Rename the building as it is now our property
by vidwan soni on Oct 27, 2017 10:29 AM
Fools, it was not Hindu temple-FANATICS changing history? You cant. World knows your mean games.
consider it a piece of marvel.Stunning building.Issue has been raised due to political reasons as it was Moughul,who deserves ,nothing but Hate from Hindues due to their crulity.
It is the failure of UP people in the first place who allow Taj Mahal to be built by Invaders and looters in their land. Now what is the use of crying.
Re: Taj Mahal
by palanki narayana on Oct 26, 2017 06:15 PM
There was no UP when Taj Mahal was built. It was Avadh. Let us not cry, let us enjoy the tourist revenue it brings.
