Re: Re: Re: If MMS takes all decisions,
by Manoj Gaur on May 19, 2009 02:58 PM
abe bhikari tu yaha kya ker raha hai? go outside sonia house and ask for something..i hope you will get something from her
Re: Re: Re: Re: If MMS takes all decisions,
by AtalBhikari Vajpayee on May 19, 2009 03:03 PM
Sonia gave me some food in the morning. Then i exercised with my boy friend LK Advani in the gym.
Re: Re: Re: Re: If MMS takes all decisions,
by AtalBhikari Vajpayee on May 19, 2009 03:03 PM
Iam a bachelor and no sisters. I used my hand. I was the best bachelor PM
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: If MMS takes all decisions,
by RG on May 19, 2009 03:34 PM
y must b having @mma though y surely seems to b a convert porki chased by taliban,hidin behind most holy name of india, not ate anything for days itlain mistress found cheap and hired to spread itlain sh1t
Hey dear comrades.... At the end, all of your talks end at religion or terror. Ofcourse its the major issues we're facing. But why, none of us are trying to think about something fruitful?; about yourself?. Our politions get the benefit from these thoughts and division. As a common citizen, what do u get out of this. Could u be able to give a better life for your dear 'n' near. I think somebody should start debate in such a manner.
Re: All About religion ....!! Nothing more 'n' less
by Amar Singh on May 19, 2009 06:34 PM
Rashed, your comment is well meaning.This is just a way to vent your frustration, anger, to focus on an "enemy", or to those who are supporters of the "enemy". Unfortunately, Rashed, religions, or rather religious groups, without exception find a desparate need to focus on others outside the faith as posing danger to the faith, to the community. "Is lam khatray me hai, Dharam ki raksha karo, we must defend our faith" So, at the end of the day, we follow this well-worn, rutted path without really gaining anything.
Long Live Dr. Singh. It is really lucky to have 2 great PMs in a row (AB Vajpayee and 2 terms for Dr. Singh). Lead India to the greatness she deserves. Jai Hind!!
Well, we must admit that your write-up is well timed. You civil servants of Indira Gandhi regime has learnt one trick perfectly, that is sycophancy. So why this sudden praise for a most average economist, poor beurocrat and good-for-nothing politician? At this age also you want some 'gaddi'? Of course, your genre neither retire nor retreat, they only have to be retrenched.
Re: What do you want now, Mr Subrahmanyam??
by Philip Philip on May 19, 2009 02:43 PM
Or boss LK Advani is exercising in the gym. Because he wants to beat Manmohan Singh in arm wrestling.
If MMS doesnt agree for the wrestling, it means that he is a weak PM.
Re: MMS
by Philip Philip on May 19, 2009 02:44 PM
Or boss LK Advani is exercising in the gym. Because he wants to beat Manmohan Singh in arm wrestling.
If MMS doesnt agree for the wrestling, it means that he is a weak PM.
Re: MMS
by Raul David on May 19, 2009 02:26 PM
Because they are running their business on Saudi Riyals. Try to understand the global scenarion boss. Prannoy Roy is the greatest hypocrit of this country.
UPA won not because it is the best party or a secular party. I personally feel any party, which is either pro Hindu or pro Muslim cannot or should not be called secular. I am secular because I judge people based on their characters and integrity not on the basis of their religion, cast, or countries of origin--I do not like Sonia because I do not get the feeling that she loves India.
UPA won because of large population of illiterate in India who can easily be manipulated by cast, religion or dynasty factor. Another reason was that they attacked Dr. Manmohan Singh who is a sincere and hard working. Although I also feel that he was and will be weak PM--a puppet should I say.
Re: Why UPA won
by Paramvir Sawhney on May 19, 2009 02:24 PM
NDTV and CNN-IBM have been shamelessly biased against BJP. They are cheerleaders of Congress
Re: Why UPA won
by Tadaham on May 19, 2009 02:26 PM
Perhaps your Grandpa or your Great-Grandpa was illiterate as well. I am sure they must have been very wise.
Re: Why UPA won
by Water on May 19, 2009 02:34 PM
LG - Advani is a puppet of RSS , so why you people nominated a puppet Advani to PM position ??? Now the people of India knows what is better for them, so you can see your own that most of the Secular parties join hands to debar BJP from communalizing India.
Re: Re: Why UPA won
by LG on May 19, 2009 04:17 PM
Water, I do not belong any party BJP or Congress. What I said was Congress itself is not secular party but a pro-Muslim party. I do not understand why people call BJP as communal.
People keep repeating of Ram mandir but I do not think BJP wanna win election to build Ram mandir.
Only those people-especially indulged in terror activities fear BJP call it communal.
Re: Re: Re: Why UPA won
by Anilkumar patel on May 19, 2009 08:12 PM
India being more hindu populated country BJP always tries to get votes on hindutya.So if you tell that BJP is not communal is absolutely wrong. About congress they have supported muslims because the party believes in all people are equal. The party is formed on equality.The party has big base of all religions. Why God did not stand by BJP? Because their ideology is MUKH ME RAM OR BUGAL ME CHHURI.
Re: Why UPA won
by Purushotham on May 19, 2009 02:27 PM
Wrong perseption to tell UPA won becaus it manipulated the illiterate people... The great thing about this election is.. People of India have givena mandate for the work of the govt. and we all know that congress itself increased its tally in 70 more seats... i don't think Indians need ram mandir... they need food,shelter,jobs,education for there children, reforms in agriculture etc...
Re: Re: Why UPA won
by Prishla Varghese on May 19, 2009 02:36 PM
Very well said purushotham, we give mandate on the progress we saw on the previous govt. Ram Mandir or any other religious issues don't help a human to survive, he needs the basic amenities.
