Re: Re: This Govt is goin to fall in 18 months
by madnessinpolitics on May 19, 2009 11:11 AM
and you keep your dirty mouth open! all you RSS flies have nothing better than to do than grind your teeth at CONGRESS victory! burn in hell rotten sky eyes
Jo Jeeta woh sikandar, stop all the nonsense discussions. If all of us try to follow the Gandhian principle of "be the change you want" and start with contributing what ever minimum possibe by each individual the country will become better day by day.
The first sentence of the second para above is wrong. In a 294-seat Assembly, anything above 147 constitutes an absolute majority. Since the Congress won 157, it is wrong to say they did not get and absolute majority.
Re: Rediff - the second para is wrong
by Raja Krsnan on May 19, 2009 10:47 AM
the authors' and community always had problem with calculations. believe it or not read his holy book for more proof.
Re: Rediff - the second para is wrong
by oldruff on May 19, 2009 10:48 AM
crossing the halfway mark by 1 seat is simple majority. Absolute majortiy is securing 2/3 seats.
Re: Rediff - the second para is wrong
by oldruff on May 19, 2009 10:48 AM
crossing the halfway mark by 1 seat is simple majority. Absolute majortiy is securing 2/3 seats.
Re: Rediff - the second para is wrong
by Marathi Indian on May 19, 2009 10:44 AM
Absolute majority is 2/3 of total seats. What congress got in AP is simple majority.
Re: Rediff - the second para is wrong
by Raja Krsnan on May 19, 2009 10:49 AM
the authors' and community always had problem with calculations. believe it or not read his holy book for more proof.
Re: Rediff - the second para is wrong
by Marathi Indian on May 19, 2009 10:43 AM
Absolute majority is 2/3 of total seats. What congress got in AP is simple majority.
Re: Rediff - the second para is wrong
by oldruff on May 19, 2009 10:47 AM
crossing the halfway mark by 1 seat is simple majority. Absolute majortiy is securing 2/3 seats.
All his rhetoric cannot point to his being a good administrator. His credibility is at stake after fielding in people like vignan's Rattiah (architect for EAMCET paper leaks!)
Re: JP: sheep in wolves' clothing?
by kasak on May 19, 2009 10:37 AM
I second you. Not only his credibility but his party ideals will be questioned. As many political analysts pointing loksatta as one of parties responsible for TDP failure to usurp power, JP have to face the tune of Congress, TDP and PRP
he didnot do any thing for the state,simply he looted the state,but naidu developed the state and generated 80 thousand crores of revenue,even then our brainless voters have defeated him,i hope some thing is wrong with evm's.any how now the real recession in india starts.any how you have to appreciate mr chiranjeevi for his cunning fox acting ,useless fellows ,these fellows spoiled the state and the younger geneeration dirty rouges.
Re: ysr
by sathya thamatam on May 19, 2009 10:29 AM
All you software guys, donot know what development is. U think it is Hitech city, Go to rural areas and learn. u think people of a whole state & nation are wrong in their selection. I pity ur ignorance.
Re: Re: ysr
by chakravarty devulapalli on May 19, 2009 10:33 AM
Excellent, very well said! People tend to think development is Hitec city, booming real estate, congested roads and unplanned mushrooming of Malls and pubs!
Re: ysr
by lavan gundeti on May 19, 2009 11:00 AM
What development you did see in your village in YSR regime? I haven't seen anything in my village. I hails from karim nagar. YSR throws biscuits at poor people and he enjoys golden biscuits from public fund. he don't know how to generate revenues. that's why selling public property of lands. he don't know employment creation. somany companies show bank face to put their industry in AP
last 5 years sufficient rains in AP. otherwise we might have seen worstest governament in AP ever.
Re: ysr
by sathya thamatam on May 19, 2009 10:30 AM
All you software guys, donot know what development is. U think it is Hitech city, Go to rural areas and learn. u think people of a whole state & nation are wrong in their selection. I pity ur ignorance.
Re: ysr
by Bommireddy surendra on May 19, 2009 10:32 AM
because the result didn't go as per ur wish the people cannot be useless. They know who has done a better job for them. Developing hyderabad doesn't mean developing state. CBN hardly had any concern for poor. YSR did so many good things for poor arogyasri, free power, loan waiver all these were the need of the hour. CBN lost hyderabad too because of his dilly dallying on Telangana issue. Corruption was high but was no better in CBN regime. Listen to JP who said both were corrupt and hence corruption ceased ot be an issue.
Re: Re: ysr
by chakravarty devulapalli on May 19, 2009 11:33 AM
are bhai, JP himself is corrupt and mad! its like choosing who is more corrupt. If CBN raked in 10-100 crores, YSR in 1000-50000crores, JP took in tens, hundreds and lakhs! So nobody is a saint! And of course Chiru himself sold seats in a big marketing venture!
chiranjeevi was a real fool to think the he would be winning the assembly elections with a huge margin of votes and would be ruling andhra pradesha! now he has humiliated himself and his prajarajyam party and its workers and his bhaktas! he has spoiled his image! he could have learnt from kannada matinee idol Dr. rajkumar and tamil superstart Rajnikanth that politics is not their cup of tea! stupid ra noovu! vaddu raa paapu!
