Sunil Mittal & Wal Mart, the biggest organisation in world by revenue of US$ 378 Billion, are tying together for organised retail initiative under Bharti's leadership. This joint venture is going to produce 2 million jobs in organised retail compared to job loss of 40 million across India. So best of luck to Mr. Mittal & govts. who are obeying to large businessmen for creating more & more poor people. Why Indian Govt. is not publishing jobs data each month/ each quarter, like USA? Indian Govt. should have to publish, so that Indian people will understand what is better for them. In USA, there was recession in 1985. Walton, the CMD of Wal-Mart had launched the campaign of MADE IN USA. Both the Wal Mart & suppliers of WALMART are agreeing about the cost & price cutting. But, afterwards Walton bought goods from outside USA & labelled them as MADE IN USA for cheaper input costs. How much margin organised retailers get? 3%-Wall Mart & 1.5%-Pantaloon Retail. What are the impacts of organised retail chains on cities other than metros? Dr. MMS had implemented organised retail under the pressure of powerful economies. Decision of organised retail is not Manmohaneconomics, but the keen desire of western countries to support their companies. WalMart is total failure in USA regarding social issues. Unorganised retailers had shut shops long ago. In small towns only malls are there. India has 125 Crs population. Unemployment will icrease heavily due to ORGANISED RETAILERS & their cartels.
Allowing organised retail in India is the biggest mistake ever done by Dr.MMS. Large corporations like reliance group & International retail chain like WalMart are now spearheading their heads in the country. What is the benefits of organised retail in INDIA is ,it gives larger corporations & multinationals an opportunity to harass ‘aam admi’ & make him more poor & poor & generate themselves a lot of money at the cost of ‘aam admi’ & only @ 0.6% to 1.8% net profit on total sales, when there are other businesses in existance which can generate them more revenues. The disadvantage is that the persons employed in retail approximately 4 crores of shopowners & 17-19 crores of their employees will register in employment exchanges in future as nonvacant candidates. The another disadvantage is about farmers. They now get better prices from multinationals than current retailers, but when the current retailers will disappear from screen, these multinationals unite themselves & form cartels & suppress for cost reduction. In detail, salary in the case of employees of organised retail ;farmers in the case of their produce & same is with the other amenities like day-to-day living instruments like appliances & other products for Small & Medium scale Enterprises. What is the benefit of customer, most of them after approx. 2-5 years later have no earnings more than now by loosing their businesses & vacancies & due to inflation & monopolistic policies of large corporations.
Re: ECONOMIC POLICY OF ORGANISED RETAIL & IT'S DEEP IMPACTS
by LaX Ray on Mar 25, 2009 10:47 AM
Organized retail allows the farmers and producers to get rid of the middlemen, who are now generally the rich and wealthy party cadres. The chain of Kirana store is so deep in India that it is not possible for these organized retail to overthrow them. What would have resulted is a competition which would result in good prices for the so called aam aadmi. But the middlemen would have suffered, no doubt about it, and we very well know who these middle men are, and why this agitation.
Re: Re: ECONOMIC POLICY OF ORGANISED RETAIL & IT'S DEEP IMPA
by udayraj on Mar 25, 2009 11:08 AM
These middlemen are in number of 4 Crores & dependent persons on them are 20 Crores. So there should not be ignorance. Also, these organised retailers are going to give franchisees; that mean agains the same system will operate. Then what is bad in the current system ? Why these large organisations are interferring in small retailers business ?
Re: Tata did the right thing
by LaX Ray on Mar 25, 2009 10:36 AM
yeah, but problem is in WB you cant do the right thing, you always need to do the left thing
Re: Re: Tata did the right thing
by Indian on Mar 25, 2009 10:39 AM
LaXRay: let them keep doing the left thing, who cares??? but this state is responsible for so many illegal muzzie immigrants in other parts of the country. As far as ur comment on the right thing, I would say it is better to opt for right wing politics than left wing.
Re: Tata did the right thing
by kavuri shastry on Mar 25, 2009 10:54 AM
Indian you are right, Modi is the right person, leaders from other states should learn,
Re: Bihar, Assam, Uttar Pradesh, Rajashtan, MP, Nagaland, Arunach
by LaX Ray on Mar 25, 2009 10:31 AM
Simple reason, WB was the most advanced state of this country, while other states are struggling to come up, WB went down and down, thanks to the 30 years of rule
It is time that political overhauling is done like any other "machinery" for the proper functioning of the country. In our country, pseudomonarchy exists.....When will this Gandhi concept end? When there will be a truly secular political party? When there will be an end to corruption? When when when? The answer is "VERY SOON". Just google "Perfect democracy bombax" and know when. Jai Hind.
One Demon Cursing the Other...! Communist are nothing but Hoodlums and Chinese Bootlickers. It is good that Nano went out of Bengal...Red Brigrade nor the people who vote them deserve it. It iis a shame that Communist are asking for it.
Re: Laughing stock
by sudip duttagupta on Mar 25, 2009 10:50 AM
it was the commies who made the plant roll out of bengal.If the anciliery units were shifted from the main plant then the plant could have been started there.(just as it is there in their pune plant).But those anciliery units have paid Tata huge amount for that land that was the mian hinderence for not shifting.Tata actually wanted to busines of land by selling land to anciliery units at a huge price.
Re: Laughing stock
by Nilesh Kulkarni on Mar 25, 2009 10:14 AM
I hope TATA should also pull out other TATA group companies from WB like TCS. Atleast on the basis of this Mamta will win elections to destroy states Investment
Re: Re: Laughing stock
by sudip duttagupta on Mar 25, 2009 01:01 PM
Mamata will win elections because she saved the money of the state from being gifted to Tatas.
Re: Re: Laughing stock
by Edward Bosco on Mar 25, 2009 10:23 AM
Blessing in Disguise to TATA, for moving the nano plant out of WB, well in time........ ( for so many painful reasons ), if not, the roll out of this Nano... or the ordersof booking could never be completed if they could have continued their operation in WB under the CPM's rule. They would have engaged and encouraged the workers to go on strike before the roll out to meet their ends.... see who is talking about develpments.. they have been destroying the nation... look at Kerala ..... even normal working gets hit by thier presence leave alone running an Industry...
Re: Mamata is traitor.
by pravat sharma on Mar 25, 2009 10:13 AM
Dear Dinesh, you do have any way out. You are an Indian. As a citizen yr duty is to vote in election. Knowing people bad or good, you have to exercise your franchise. We all feel a CHANGE but how and when.
Re: Mamata is traitor.
by LaX Ray on Mar 25, 2009 10:40 AM
better shooting our foot than being shot right at chest or head as we saw our great govt did in Nandigram
On the contrary,Bengal is now giving blessings to Mamata for restricting tatas doing land business at Singur.The recent Panchayet results at Singur and entire Hoogly proves that.Tatas planned to the land alloted for anciliery units at a heavy rate and do land selling business.Mamata hit at the right point and people now have started understanding it.Till today no one knows how many anciliery units were supposed to come there and what would be their products.People are no longer fool in bengal and singur.They have started blessing Mamata and she is reaping the fruits now.
People like Mamta are like a mill stone around one's neck. They put their party's & personal agenda before the country's. The country should go for a 2 party system. Opposition does not mean opposing everything the ruling party does. They should provide the checks and balances in an administration. Wake up citizens!
Re: West Bengal & Mamta
by sudip duttagupta on Mar 25, 2009 01:04 PM
Mr Ier. Its was not her personal or party's agenda.Had it been so,she could not have won the panchayet elections at singur itself.The people of singur didnot want this plant there as Tata was mianly into selling land at a huge price and making land business.The people of WB have now understood what Tatas plan was and that is the reason Mamata is winning at Hoogly,Nandigram,Singur and Bishnupur.
Re: West Bengal & Mamta
by kaushik on Mar 25, 2009 10:09 AM
Two party system with the BJP wouldnt work. They are a party which is completely oblivious to the nature of the major part of India. They appeal to the cow belt sensibilities of UP Bihar people whose primary agenda seems to be the construction of Ram mandir. Would it solve the poverty, illiteracy, health problems or unemployment in this country ? India needs an alternative to BJP for a two party system to work.
