BJP lacks both competencies and conviction to govern a culturally and socio-economically DIVERSE and distinct society like India.
* Advani and Modi injected VENOM in certain sections of Indian society. * Voting for them is equal to voting for dis-integration of India.
Or, * You must vote for your CASTE till 85% of all registered marriages in India are INTER-CASTE or INTER-FAITH. * Only he can UNDERSTAND your culture and IMPROVE your socio-economic status.
This is the only way to STOP dis-integration of India.
Re: Vote for Congress OR for your Caste.
by firefly on Apr 27, 2009 10:36 AM
Advani and Modi?
what about Abdul Geelani, Tytler, Sajjan Kumar, Abu Azmi, Ullema Council, Mulayam Singh, Sanjay Dutt, MMS...all of them have given communal statements
Was there a reason for Manmohan SIngh to have spoken about Babri Masjid now after 15 years?
What if all Hindus start speaking about their Mecca-Ayodhya being broken by a Barbaric Sultan called Babar?
But Hindus are tolerant. They will not do things like that. I dont think even Islaam allows naming a Masjid after a Sultan(Sultanism itself is not allowed).
Re: Vote for Congress OR for your Caste.
by firefly on Apr 27, 2009 10:39 AM
Advani and Modi?
what about Abdul Geelani, Tytler, Sajjan Kumar, Abu Azmi, Ullema Council, Mulayam Singh, Sanjay Dutt, MMS...all of them have given communal statements
Was there a reason for MMS to have spoken about Baaabreeee Masjeeeed now after 15 years?
What if all Hinduz start speaking about their own pilgrimage, which is Ayodhya being broken by a Aghori Sultan called Baabar?
But Hindus are tolerant. They will not do things like that. I dont think even Eslaaam allows naming a Shrine after a Sultan(Sultanism itself is not allowed).
Re: Vote for Congress OR for your Caste.
by firefly on Apr 27, 2009 10:32 AM
Staying in New York and bad mouthing doesnt help. Do u know the achievements of BJP in past 5 years?
Tally those of BJP and Congress.
BJP did 55% more than what a COngress couldnt do even in a 55 years!
Your Congress understands Socialism well?
What abt conversions based on free education? Isnt it forced conversion for people below poverty line. Definitely they will be forced to convert for financial gains! What about triggering talks of Communalism and Divide? Congress has a lot of Mafia base for rioting...what abt that?
HAHAHAHAHHA----- go read news, see facts, roam India and then speak!
Re: Vote for Congress OR for your Caste.
by firefly on Apr 27, 2009 10:38 AM
Advani and Modi?
what about Abdul Geelani, Tytler, Sajjan Kumar, Abu Azmi, Ullema Council, Mulayam Singh, Sanjay Dutt, MMS...all of them have given communal statements
Was there a reason for Manmohan SIngh to have spoken about Baaabreeee Masjeeeed now after 15 years?
What if all Hinduz start speaking about their own Makkkaaa, which is Ayodhya being broken by a Aghori Sultan called Babar?
But Hindus are tolerant. They will not do things like that. I dont think even Eslaaam allows naming a Moskue after a Sultan(Sultanism itself is not allowed).
Re: Grow up Indians
by gautam maitra on Apr 27, 2009 10:24 AM
The long the NRGs continue praising Modi and try invite Modi and fail to get his VISA, more frustrated Modi becomes and more his Indian fans try to throw show on Indians. Modi is the true Gujrati or else Gandhigiri is forgotten in the land of Gandhi under his sinsiter plan to create a hatred-raj similer to Hitler-raj in Germany.People of Gujarat may have to give a huge price in future for such blind faith in a fasist ruler who loves and imitate Hitler and never ever speak and ask people to imitate Gandhi- the father of nation.
Re: Re: Grow up Indians
by aurora borealis on Apr 27, 2009 10:46 AM
When exactly did Modi apply for a Visa? Its just a weapon when you dont have anything else to say. Lolz. And does anyone need Visa to a country that has a track record of bombing others, to prove his or her worth? Shame on you for holding yourselves so cheap.
Come on all Indians Hindu population wake up and make up your mind show the world what you can do what you wants, you are not useless one. Get united and vote BJP even if some of them are not so good but somethings is better than nothing as all other parties are basically terror supporting party so come out and stap on LOTUS Signs as Lotus is our Nationa flower. Sreekrishna also stands on Lotus feet. Hare Krishna to all
Re: Re: Appesement, votebank politics is root cause behind presen
by Tulika Chatterjee on Apr 27, 2009 10:38 AM
What are you talking about? Nepal has been taken over by Maoists. Its unstable and insecure. People are fleeing the country every day. Its long ceased to be a Heendo nation.
Please answer these questions for yourself also There are nearly 52 mu slim countries. Show one mu slim country which provides Haj subsidy. Show one mu slim country where hind us are extended the special rights that mu slims are accorded in India? Show one country where the 85% majority craves for the indulgence of the 15% minority. Show one mu slim country, which has a Non-mu slim as its President or Prime Minister. Show one Mullah or Maulvi who has declared a 'fatwa' against terrorists. hind u-majority Maharashtra, Bihar, Kerala, Pondicherry , etc. have in the past elected mu slims as CM's, Can you ever imagine a hind u becoming the CM of mu slim - majority J&K? Today hind us are 85%. If hind us are intolerant, how come Masjids and madrasas are thriving? How come mu slims are offering Namaz on the road? How come mu slims are proclaiming 5 times a day on loud speakers that there is no God except Allah? When hind us gave to mu slims 30% of Bharat for a song, why should hind us now beg for their sacred places at Ayodhya, Mathura And Kashi? Why Temple funds are spent for the welfare of mu slims and Christians, when they are free to spend their money in any way they like? When uniform is made compulsory for school children, why there is no Uniform Civil Code for citizens? In what way, J&K is different from Maharashtra, TamilNadu or UttarPradesh, to have Article 370?
Re: Re: Re: Congress is totaly mu slim bias
by VASUDEVAN VM on Apr 27, 2009 10:16 AM
Of course it is a joke. The amswer is the questionitself as our country is ountry - India - and we are not ruling here by hindus or muslims or christians, we are being ruled by Indians elected by Indians. If any person- MP/MLA/Minister happened to be a muslim or christian he ahas been voted by the people of that particular constituency not by any particular caste or religion. People like Vinod is breaking such a good thinking and dividing on communal.
Re: Congress is totaly mu slim bias
by gautam maitra on Apr 27, 2009 10:12 AM
Who ruled the earth first? Hindu or Muslim or Christians? None , my brother. Man came first, religion came much later to be part of mankind. So, religion can have their natural death - apareent if you read the world ancient histroy. New religions are born too. Existing religion get new clothing to suit the changes as well. So respect all religion if you respect man and life. Please don't poison webs with religious hate speeches...Jai Ho ...the Communists.
Re: Congress is totaly mu slim bias
by Imran on Apr 27, 2009 10:11 AM
THE IDEA of "appeasement" is strongly embedded in public debates about the privileges that India's religious minorities are supposed to be enjoying. It has become such a powerful political idea that it has percolated into popular discourse as well. To a lesser extent, this notion is used also in discussions on caste — appeasement is an accusatory description of the constitutional system of reservation for the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and the Other Backward Castes. The political jousting about appeasement on a caste basis is still a delicate issue. But as Indian society has become increasingly divided on communal lines, such delicacy does not visit discussions about the so-called privileges enjoyed by India's Muslim citizens. No political party, not even the Congress, has tried to propagate or practice the secular ethos. The Muslims are included in different electoral strategies, not in developmental targets.
Re: Re: Congress is totaly mu slim bias
by Imran on Apr 27, 2009 10:11 AM
But does the idea of appeasement have any basis in fact? Like all powerful but divisive ideas this too belongs to the realm of imagination. Ever since the Rajiv Gandhi Government cynically modified Muslim personal law after the Shah Bano judgment in the mid-1980s (which was equally cynically balanced by the opening of the locks on the Babri Masjid), the accusations of `reverse' discrimination have been legion. Article 370 on Jammu and Kashmir, the absence of a common civil code and the special rights of minority educational institutions are some of the examples dredged up to fan the communal debate. No mention here, of course, of the privileges enjoyed by the majority community, the best example being the tax advantages conferred on Hindu Undivided Families.
Re: Re: Re: Congress is totaly mu slim bias
by Imran on Apr 27, 2009 10:12 AM
One way to subject this notion of appeasement to critical examination is to list the special rights enjoyed by each religious group and assess the rationale of, or its absence for, each privilege. Another is to ask if the members of the religious minorities — especially Muslims — now enjoy a superior social and economic position, as they must be if the state has been "appeasing" them while discriminating against members of the religious majority. It only takes a naked eye to observe that Muslims on the average are not by any standard at an economically higher level than the Hindus. No reference to the retail outlets and restaurants that are owned by the Muslims or the remittances that they receive from relatives working in West Asia or even to refurbished mosques can distort the picture of a community that as a whole is disadvantageously placed in comparison to Indians who belong to all other religions. Of course, prejudices cannot countenance honest observation.
Re: Re: Re: Congress is totaly mu slim bias
by Imran on Apr 27, 2009 10:15 AM
The socio-economic profile that the NSSO estimates paint of the M*slim Indian is a depressing one. In all major socio-economic indicators, the members of India's biggest r*ligious minority are, on the average, worse off than members of the majority community. First, they spend less on items of daily consumption because they apparently earn less. The incidence of poverty is therefore likely to be higher among M*slims than H*ndus. Second, literacy rates are substantially higher among the Hindus. And a H*ndu boy or girl who goes to school is more likely to go on to college than a M8slim. Third, working M8slims are to be found more in casual labour and seasonal occupations than H8ndus. Fourth, among those with access to land a H*ndu household is more likely to be cultivating larger plots. Fifth, unemployment rates are higher among M*slims than H*ndus. This overall profile is true of both men and women, in rural and urban India and in all States. Moreover, the disparity between the majority and minority religious groups in most cases widened during the 1990s.
Re: Re: Re: Congress is totaly mu slim bias
by Imran on Apr 27, 2009 10:15 AM
The socio-economic profile that the NSSO estimates paint of the M*slim Indian is a depressing one. In all major socio-economic indicators, the members of India's biggest religious minority are, on the average, worse off than members of the majority community. First, they spend less on items of daily consumption because they apparently earn less. The incidence of poverty is therefore likely to be higher among M*slims than Hindus. Second, literacy rates are substantially higher among the Hindus. And a Hindu boy or girl who goes to school is more likely to go on to college than a M8slim. Third, working M8slims are to be found more in casual labour and seasonal occupations than H8ndus. Fourth, among those with access to land a H*ndu household is more likely to be cultivating larger plots. Fifth, unemployment rates are higher among M*slims than H*ndus. This overall profile is true of both men and women, in rural and urban India and in all States. Moreover, the disparity between the majority and minority religious groups in most cases widened during the 1990s.
Re: Congress is totaly mu slim bias
by vinay bunty on Apr 27, 2009 10:10 AM
Our MODI is an OBC ..he will do to upper castes what he did to Porkis .. MODI 4 PM ..
of soniya gandhi, the same soniya who was a bar-attendor (or girl) in Itly. Same soniya who took 14 yrs. of duration to accept indian nationality even thoudh she was wife of a Indian PM.
